D
Dave
Hi;
To get the look I wanted for a list of links, I:
1. Created an unordered list.
2. Used the list properties dialogue to set the bullet
image to a blank image I had made (a white duplicate of my
theme's bullet) and the line height to 1.5 lines.
FP made the expected code of a <ul> tag with an image
source of my blank image and a style setting line-height:
150%. Ok fine.
Then I saved the page. When I opened it back up, FP had
completely rewritten the list as a two-column table!!!
And there are odd "msimagelist" notations in all the
tables's <tr>, <td> and <table> tags that don't reference
anything. At least it looks as intended when viewed.
What the heck????? Is there maybe some change in how HTML
handles styles that would possess FP to completely rewrite
a block of HTML into something completely and utterly
different? Even if the end result looks as intended, this
seems insane. The table code is 3 times as long as an
equivelent "styled" unordered list.
Thanks,
Dave
To get the look I wanted for a list of links, I:
1. Created an unordered list.
2. Used the list properties dialogue to set the bullet
image to a blank image I had made (a white duplicate of my
theme's bullet) and the line height to 1.5 lines.
FP made the expected code of a <ul> tag with an image
source of my blank image and a style setting line-height:
150%. Ok fine.
Then I saved the page. When I opened it back up, FP had
completely rewritten the list as a two-column table!!!
And there are odd "msimagelist" notations in all the
tables's <tr>, <td> and <table> tags that don't reference
anything. At least it looks as intended when viewed.
What the heck????? Is there maybe some change in how HTML
handles styles that would possess FP to completely rewrite
a block of HTML into something completely and utterly
different? Even if the end result looks as intended, this
seems insane. The table code is 3 times as long as an
equivelent "styled" unordered list.
Thanks,
Dave