At last!!!>> I am announcing THE NEW ERA OF OS's.

T

Tiberius

I decided to announce the future so I can end this fussing about windows
ubuntu etc.

One thing is for sure... Vista is the doomsday machine for Microsoft whether
you like it or understand it or not. It is true.

The future is different than you all think. But I know it. Now you all
listen for a change....

Who will win? Windows, MacOSX, or Ubuntu.

The answer is NONE OF THEM!

So who will win and how?

Simple.

There will be no desktop "OS".. everything will be web based... your whole
OS will be online.

This will be possible because of the new extremely fast internet connection
speeds.

-You wont have to download anything because it will already be "there"
-You will have unlimited space because the data will not be stored
locally...
-All apps will install with one click and never have a configuration problem
because they will not even be installed on your own computer,
rather they will be like modules only being activated on the server.
-Updates will be automatic, you will only be asked if you want the update...
-Sending a 1 gb file to a friend will be almost instant since it will never
even pass through "your" computer rather it will be relayed from the
network.

What will be the underlying OS on your PC running this web based OS? It will
probably be a thin and lite opensource version of Linux.
However existing computers will also be able to log onto this web OS.

Who will win the web based OS war is another thing.... but one thing is for
sure... it wont be Microsoft! Vista is killing Microsoft and its going down.

The fact is that the best man will win since switching to a new "OS" will be
like surfing to a new web site.
There will be an OS war like never before... and all this competition will
benefit the consumer who will get everything for free!

Wars for giving something out for free? YES.. because whoever controls this
Web OS will be able to make money like Google does.

All this is not new.... this is what they thought computing would be when
computers started to exist!
They thought there would be several super duper mainframes that would do all
the work and then millions of stupid cheap "terminals" that people would
use.

In fact someone at IBM said that 5 supercomputers in all the world are
enough to serve the world.

He said it because he was thinking of central computing. And I believe that
this is a solution now that the internet is getting faster.

As you see things are going full circle... but it would not be that way IF
VISTA WAS GOOD.

If vista was good then there would be no need for other solutions for many
years to come.

Do you all now understand the significant historical implications of Vista's
horrendous FLOP?

Vista, because its crap, will change computing forever! HA!

Perhaps an engineer is reading this message now, and he will get the idea im
talking about that will change the computing world.

Under this perspective it will be I that will have changed the world :)

-K
 
T

Tiberius

I want to add that because this will be all web based,
the hardware will be CHEAP AS DIRT to run this thing.
There will even be machines with no hard drive at all...
just a flash drive to boot up the machine..

THERE ARE ALREADY SUCH MACHINES AVAILABLE..

I am talking about under $100 for a computer...

this will enable the whole world to be online, and this will indeed have an
impact on humanity like nothing ever seen before in history.
 
A

ArameFarpado

Em Quinta, 27 de Setembro de 2007 19:51, Tiberius escreveu:
There will be no desktop "OS".. everything will be web based... your whole
OS will be online.
This will be possible because of the new extremely fast internet
connection speeds.
Hey dumbass, how the hell will you get online without an local OS? Hum?

Do you know what an Os is at all?
 
T

Tiberius

This also means that your "computer" will be available in any place YOU are.

For example, you go to an internet cafe, you log onto YOUR account and
instantly your own desktop is there for you,
you log onto the office account and you have your office desktop at home..

this is simple its possible and convienent and IT WILL HAPPEN.

THIS will be the death of Microsoft, No Linux, not MACOS, since microsoft
will not be able to follow this course of web based OS, simply because MS
doesnt think like that, they want to sell their desktop OS, and they are not
flexible fast enough.
 
T

Tiberius

Hey dumbass, how the hell will you get online without an local OS? Hum?

Hey dumbass cant you READ?

I explain that in my post.. I am copy pasting it here since you are so lazy
to read

"What will be the underlying OS on your PC running this web based OS? It
will
probably be a thin and lite opensource version of Linux.
However existing computers will also be able to log onto this web OS."
 
A

ArameFarpado

Em Quinta, 27 de Setembro de 2007 20:05, Tiberius escreveu:
Hey dumbass cant you READ?

I explain that in my post.. I am copy pasting it here since you are so
lazy to read

"What will be the underlying OS on your PC running this web based OS? It
will
probably be a thin and lite opensource version of Linux.
However existing computers will also be able to log onto this web OS."

Those things allready exist for years now, and they are not OS's, you can
call it limited Web Desktop Suites but not OS's...

How the hell will you burn a DVD, capture an analog sound, capture video
from a handycam, listen to your cd-audio, and so on, if you don't have a
full operative OS localy in your PC?

The stuff you point are limited desktop suites suitable for little jobs, or
for people that doesn't have any ideia of what computers can do at all.

bye
 
T

Tiberius

Do you want to be a dumbass or are you really asking questions that you want
a serious reply to?

Do you want a serious answer so you can see that what I am talking about is
totally
feasable, and even more practical that the current way we use comptuers?

If not, I wont waste my time explaining...
 
A

ArameFarpado

Em Quinta, 27 de Setembro de 2007 20:29, Tiberius escreveu:
feasable, and even more practical that the current way we use comptuers?
Right, an extreme limitation will be more practical...
now i can see what as been refered as "toy os" around here...

bye dumbass
 
D

dennis@home

Vista User said:
Scotty is looking for you in the transporter room.

You shouldn't laugh too soon.
A few years ago I worked with a company in Oxford who were working on
compilers that produced hardware.

The hardware was in the form of programmable gate arrays.
It could do some interesting things:-

like a game that had moving "sprites" and land masses to navigate.. all done
without any CPU and done in a parallel way.. so parallel there wasn't even a
screen buffer, the display was generated on the fly.

another one that was done for us was a voip phone.. everything was compiled
onto the silicon including the IP stack.

Only one thing I saw used a "processor" and that was a java engine and even
that was complied from a "C" like source. It ran a web browser and was used
to select and load which bit of hardware you were going to use.
It took about a second to change the hardware from one task to another.

I haven't keep track of the technology since, but I might have a look if I
can remember who it was.

http://www.xilinx.com/publications/xcellonline/xcell_58/xc_pdf/p046-048_58-cebatech.pdf
gives details of a similar system but I don't think it was the one I played
with.

Its only a matter of time before computers are replaced by reconfigurable
hardware and then the Mac/PC and OS wars will be over (maybe).
 
V

Vista User

Never heard of Citrix or Terminal Services?


dennis@home said:
You shouldn't laugh too soon.
A few years ago I worked with a company in Oxford who were working on
compilers that produced hardware.

The hardware was in the form of programmable gate arrays.
It could do some interesting things:-

like a game that had moving "sprites" and land masses to navigate.. all
done without any CPU and done in a parallel way.. so parallel there wasn't
even a screen buffer, the display was generated on the fly.

another one that was done for us was a voip phone.. everything was
compiled onto the silicon including the IP stack.

Only one thing I saw used a "processor" and that was a java engine and
even that was complied from a "C" like source. It ran a web browser and
was used to select and load which bit of hardware you were going to use.
It took about a second to change the hardware from one task to another.

I haven't keep track of the technology since, but I might have a look if I
can remember who it was.

http://www.xilinx.com/publications/xcellonline/xcell_58/xc_pdf/p046-048_58-cebatech.pdf
gives details of a similar system but I don't think it was the one I
played with.

Its only a matter of time before computers are replaced by reconfigurable
hardware and then the Mac/PC and OS wars will be over (maybe).
 
T

Tiberius

yes.. well what is different from normal pc's

1) no hard drive, no moving parts, only a 4 gig flash drive
2) online storage and one click installations done by the zonbu web service
3) totally silent, and needs only 20 watts to work
4) hundreds of usb drivers install with no problem, automatically without
you doing anything.
5) No viruses because its Linux
6) when you press the power its instantly on.

This is part web based.. you can pay *if you want*, a 12 dollar per month
fee to have the web based service.

However my prediction states that all this will be free soon from other
companies of course....
 
V

Vista User

dennis@home said:
You don't understand.
Try reading the pdf.

I do understand. I would still consider running "Code" to attach to a
service with a dedicated hardware device close enough to be considered by
the masses as a computer with a dedicated "OS".
 
P

Pentium

Ah... I believe Microsoft has been working on "external services" and the
future (sic) for years with others such as HP ....
 
D

dennis@home

Vista User said:
I do understand. I would still consider running "Code" to attach to a
service with a dedicated hardware device close enough to be considered by
the masses as a computer with a dedicated "OS".

Reprogrammable gate arrays.. i.e. not dedicated.
The hardware changes on the fly when you switch application.
Like I said I have seen a device with no processor at all running video
games and VoIP and other stuff.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top