Aquamark 03

S

Shawk

Hiya,

Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but
Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for
access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they
fared?

GFX - 3420
CPU - 4165
Score - 24,243

Asus A7V8X
XP2100+ (palomino)
Sapphire 9600 pro
512meg PC2700

Cheers, Shawk.
 
E

Evgenii

not that it's a relevant reply,

i'm running a geforce 2 Ti on a system which is pretty much top o' the
range, and get a score of about 8300.

think it's time for an upgrade...
 
A

Archduke

Hi NG

my results of Aquamark:

pts: 37860
Gfx: 5280
CPU: 6693

My system:
P4 1.6a @ 2.4 150Mhz FSB RAM 200Mhz (ratio 3:4), stock Intel cooling,
ASUS P4B533-e, 768 MB Samsung PC 2700, 2,5-3-3-7,
Hercules 3DProphet9800pro non oced, Catalyst 3.7,
Win XP home, System is rock-stable :)

Gx Archduke
 
T

Thomas

My results;

32191 points
10232 CPU
3819 Graphics

System:
P4 2.6c @ 3.25 GHz
Intel 875P board (DFI)
512 MB ram, dual channel, at 400 mHz
Radeon 9500 np 128 MB, softmodded to 9700, 330/304 MHz
 
M

MikeE

GFX 5793
CPU 7430
Score 41,695
FPS 41.70

XP2100+ (TBred) @2100 on Abit NF7-S 2.0
9800pro (no oc) catalyst 3.7
1 Ghz 3200 ddr

MikeE
 
M

methylenedioxy

MikeE said:
GFX 5793
CPU 7430
Score 41,695
FPS 41.70

XP2100+ (TBred) @2100 on Abit NF7-S 2.0
9800pro (no oc) catalyst 3.7
1 Ghz 3200 ddr

MikeE
Click to expand...
Bullshit
No way did you get that score......
 
A

Amsterdamage

MikeE said:
GFX 5793
CPU 7430
Score 41,695
FPS 41.70

XP2100+ (TBred) @2100 on Abit NF7-S 2.0
9800pro (no oc) catalyst 3.7
1 Ghz 3200 ddr

MikeE
Click to expand...
Bullshit
No way you have 1ghz ddr
 
T

TMack

Shawk said:
Hiya,

Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but
Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for
access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they
fared?

GFX - 3420
CPU - 4165
Score - 24,243

Asus A7V8X
XP2100+ (palomino)
Sapphire 9600 pro
512meg PC2700

Cheers, Shawk.
Click to expand...

For comparison - overclocked but not softmodded 9500 non-pro

AquaMark Score: 25089

CPU: 5151,
GFX: 3315
FPS: 25.09
TPS: 7552 K
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ CR: 2152 MHz (overclocked Barton 2500+)
SRAM: 1024 MB
OS: Microsoft Windows 2000
GFX: RADEON 9500 SERIES CM: 371 / 297 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER:
6.14.1.6292

Tony
 
S

Shawk

TMack said:
For comparison - overclocked but not softmodded 9500 non-pro

AquaMark Score: 25089

CPU: 5151,
GFX: 3315
FPS: 25.09
TPS: 7552 K
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ CR: 2152 MHz (overclocked Barton 2500+)
SRAM: 1024 MB
OS: Microsoft Windows 2000
GFX: RADEON 9500 SERIES CM: 371 / 297 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER:
6.14.1.6292

Tony
Click to expand...

Thanks all.

Looking to upgrade to a Barton XP2800 soon with another stick of 512meg
PC2700 memory. Should see an improvement in the real world and, judging by
some of the scores here, in the benchmark world too.

Cheers, Shawk.

(Support at Aquamark didnt get back to me so it looks like I'll have to
re-register to do any more comparisons)
 
M

MikeE

methylenedioxy said:
So how do you explain that one then?
I am running the same driver set, an XP2600 overclocked to 400fsb and 400fsb
memory and 2.2ghz and with a radeon 9700 pro overclocked to 9800 pro speeds
on an abit nf7s and I still dont get near yours. Hows that then?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=118717048
Click to expand...

I honestly can't explain it, maybe running the 9700pro at 9800pro speeds
isn't enough to give same results?

MikeE
 
M

methylenedioxy

MikeE said:
I honestly can't explain it, maybe running the 9700pro at 9800pro speeds
isn't enough to give same results?

MikeE
Click to expand...
Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results,
something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max running at
333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt running at
266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody
scoring mechanism is all wrong....
 
M

MikeE

methylenedioxy said:
Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results,
something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max running at
333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt running at
266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody
scoring mechanism is all wrong....
Click to expand...

I'm running the memory 200fsb (2 sticks in slots 2&3) and cpu 10.5x200
I only downloaded aquamark this evening, I didn't know that you can cheat
it.

MikeE
 
J

John David Carter

methylenedioxy said:
So how do you explain that one then?
I am running the same driver set, an XP2600 overclocked to 400fsb and 400fsb
memory and 2.2ghz and with a radeon 9700 pro overclocked to 9800 pro speeds
on an abit nf7s and I still dont get near yours. Hows that then?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=118717048
Click to expand...

Hmmm...

Can't figure it, but my score: 45525

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=138422817

GFX: 6312
CPU: 8158
FPS: 45.53

XP2500+ ( Barton ) @ 2405mhz on Abit NF7-S 2.0
9800pro @ 410/360 dx9b - cat. 3.7 ( Omegas 2.4.78 )
1Gb Corsair XMS3200
 
R

RamFan

My system- Gigabyte 7VT600-L, Barton 2500+ (not oc'd), 2x 512 mb Samsung
PC3200 running at 400, Radeon 9600 pro (oc'd core at 450, memory at 330) I
got GFX 3777, CPU 4778, Score 27069.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Best bang for buck CPU? 9
Pointer on memory please 1

Top