T
TheNetAvenger
People think MVP is actually based on 'real' knowledge, understanding, or
even technical achievement. It is not, and can be something as simple as
being a forum nerd that responds to 1000s of posts repeating other people's
answers, with no understanding themselves.
I would trust a first year computer engineer student over 99% of people with
MVP tags.
I have taught classes for everything from A+ to most Microsoft Certification
Exams and people would be shocked at the people that are able to pass these
tests based on luck and mediocre understanding of the topic. A good test
taker or someone that can regurgitate information does not mean they
'understand' the material. So beyond MVP, even an MSCE or A+ certified tag
for someone can be quite misleading.
even technical achievement. It is not, and can be something as simple as
being a forum nerd that responds to 1000s of posts repeating other people's
answers, with no understanding themselves.
I would trust a first year computer engineer student over 99% of people with
MVP tags.
I have taught classes for everything from A+ to most Microsoft Certification
Exams and people would be shocked at the people that are able to pass these
tests based on luck and mediocre understanding of the topic. A good test
taker or someone that can regurgitate information does not mean they
'understand' the material. So beyond MVP, even an MSCE or A+ certified tag
for someone can be quite misleading.