All Computers suing Intel...Bogus

[ByteEnable]

In my opinion, the suit is without merit. The patents cover a logical
method to start and stop a clock signal going to a CPU with phase. Its
primary invention was to OVERCLOCK a cpu. Intel's clocking methods use
advance circuitry such as high frequency PLL's and other forms of more
sophisticated clocking control to cross clock domains.

http://www.linuxelectrons.com/article.php/20040521120908833

 

[Jan Panteltje]

In my opinion, the suit is without merit. The patents cover a logical
method to start and stop a clock signal going to a CPU with phase. Its
primary invention was to OVERCLOCK a cpu. Intel's clocking methods use
advance circuitry such as high frequency PLL's and other forms of more
sophisticated clocking control to cross clock domains.

http://www.linuxelectrons.com/article.php/20040521120908833

It seems #5,506,981 is not completely 'of target'.
Bad, these kinds of claims, perhaps prior art can be proven.
PLL is a normal electronics method, synthesizer, same,
start-stop method was already in use in the sixties.
Maybe I should patent the .... for later.
JP

 

[KR Williams]

It seems #5,506,981 is not completely 'of target'.
Bad, these kinds of claims, perhaps prior art can be proven.
PLL is a normal electronics method, synthesizer, same,
start-stop method was already in use in the sixties.
Maybe I should patent the .... for later.

As usual, Jan is drunk.