P
PTravel
mhonzell said:Of course it's not universal.
A quick search of the Adobe forums produced:
116 problems with InDesign and Vista compatibility.
~50% were pre-RTM release.
47 problems with Dreamweaver and Vista compatibility.
390 problems with Photoshop and Vista compatability.
If you attribute half to pre-RTM release and half of the remainder to
unfamiliar with Vista/Adobe installation, then it's a very minor problem
and
as a company, I probably wouldn't worry about a patch at this time either.
That was my point. The article makes it sound like the only way to use
Adobe products under Vista is to buy future releases that are
Vista-compatible. That is clearly not the case. However, as with this ng,
a lot of the problems reported on the Adobe forums are from users who are,
to put it charitably, "unsophisticated" with respect to software and
computers. I suspect that is the case with a considerable number of
Vista-related issues that are reported there.
(The same could be said about most of the Vista release problems/bugs.)
I just get riled when people's help is: "It works on my machine...
therefore, it's not a problem."
I wasn't offering help, but commenting on the article, as well as the
subject line of this thread. However, I get riled when someone says, "it
doesn't work on my machine, therefore Vista is garbage" which,
unfortunately, is the tone of a lot of posts to this ng. There's plenty
that I don't like about Vista (e.g. UAC), but plenty that I do. However, I
think the biggest problem is the complete and utter lack of documentation
and mid-level help from Microsoft. Most people's problems that I see here
are from a lack of familiarity with the OS, specifically, and computers,
generally. For example, it took me a while to realize that there was a
"compatability mode" that can resolve many software installation issues; I
stumbled on it quite by accident.
I remember the days when Microsoft provided a nice manual with the OS that
explained everything. Those days are long gone.