J
James
Hi,
I am working on a fairly simple 2003 AD design. There are 4 physical sites
and this design will have 2 DC's at the central site. There will be no DC's
at the remote sites, because the number of users versus the WAN bandwidth
and fault tolerance of the WAN does not warrant it.
Its possible that I would want to use software distribution with DFS.
Therefore I will create 4 AD sites, and associate them with the correct
subnets. Each physical site will have a DFS target server (member). In the
event that software distribution is not used and therefore DFS not being
required in this case, I was wondering what the justification would be for
creating four AD sites rather than one. The only reasons I can think of are:
1. site policies
2. DFS target selection
Thanks,
James
I am working on a fairly simple 2003 AD design. There are 4 physical sites
and this design will have 2 DC's at the central site. There will be no DC's
at the remote sites, because the number of users versus the WAN bandwidth
and fault tolerance of the WAN does not warrant it.
Its possible that I would want to use software distribution with DFS.
Therefore I will create 4 AD sites, and associate them with the correct
subnets. Each physical site will have a DFS target server (member). In the
event that software distribution is not used and therefore DFS not being
required in this case, I was wondering what the justification would be for
creating four AD sites rather than one. The only reasons I can think of are:
1. site policies
2. DFS target selection
Thanks,
James