Acronis True Image or Symantec's Norton Ghost ?

G

Guest

I have XP Home on my computer and am useing XP's backup program and system
restore to keep out of trouble but after reading alot of post on this
newsgroup I have decided I need a better way to back up my OS.
I would like to know which is the best and easiest to use Acronis True Image
or Symantec's Norton Ghost ?
Any useful comments would be welcome.
Foxhole
 
G

Guest

I prefer Acronis, but I haven't used Ghost for many, many years. I've heard
of recent improvements in Ghost tho'
 
B

Blair

Foxhole said:
I have XP Home on my computer and am useing XP's backup program and system
restore to keep out of trouble but after reading alot of post on this
newsgroup I have decided I need a better way to back up my OS.
I would like to know which is the best and easiest to use Acronis True Image
or Symantec's Norton Ghost ?
Any useful comments would be welcome.
Foxhole

Without a doubt it is Acronis True Image. It is easy to understand and easy
to use
Blair
 
R

Richard Urban [MVP]

My vote is for Ghost 9.0 and the subsequent updates to the same.

--
Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User

Quote from: George Ankner
"If you knew as much as you thought you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!"
 
G

Guest

Ghost was unusable with my system. Received a refund from Norton. Purchased
Acronis and have been very happy with the software. No problems with USB hard
drive or local network use. Easy to use-no manual necessary.
 
J

Janus

I use Norton Ghost. I do not have Norton installed on my PC though - I just
use the boot Ghost floppy I made on another machine to boot up the PC - then
create the image file on either optical media or on a secondary drive.

I find it extremely easy to use and very fast. It can do my system drive
back up in under 10 minutes - with a hard drive write.

The floppy utility can do a restore too. The one time I had to do a restore,
it took just over eight minutes. My system is around 6 GB in size
uncompressed. All my documents and work files are on dedicated secondary
drives.

Janus
 
T

Timothy Daniels

Cymbal Man Freq. said:
The Perfect Backup Approach by Gene Barlow: He used
to sell PQ's Drive Image products until Symantec bought
it out and incorporated it into Norton Ghost 9.
Now he extolls the virtues of Acronis.

http://www.rcsi.org/Newsletter/2004/Oct04Monitor.pdf


Other newsletters from the same organization:

http://www.rcsi.org/newsletr.htm


I use Casper XP for cloning my entire system partition.
to another HD - either a "secondary" internal HD or a HD on a
removable tray. If you have to switch systems, all you have to
do is reboot, reset the BIOS's HD boot order so that it sends
control to the secondary HD, then let it start up the clone system.
Casper XP is downloadable in free trial form from FSS Dev's
website at http://www.fssdev.com/products/casperxp/ . I put
archive versions of my primary system onto a large capacity HD
(which True Image cannot do) which is housed in a removable
HD tray that is made by Kingwin. I've found that their model
with the fan in bottom of the removable tray keeps the HD nice
and cool. It's all aluminum, and you can currently find the rack
and tray set on the Web going for $24. See Kingwin's website
for details:
http://www.kingwin.com/pdut_detail.asp?LineID=&CateID=25&ID=136

You can use several trays, each with a different HD, and use them
with the same rack. I've seen just the tray going for around $14.

When you make a clone, though, be sure to start up the new clone
for the 1st time with its "parent" system not visible to it. You can do
this by unplugging the "parent" HD. If you don't, the clone will
permanently depend on the presence of its "parent", and it will
never become an independent "adult" system. After its first bootup,
the new clone can be booted with the "parent" present, and it will
see the "parent" as just another partition having an accessible file
structure.

*TimDaniels*
 
J

jonah

I have XP Home on my computer and am useing XP's backup program and system
restore to keep out of trouble but after reading alot of post on this
newsgroup I have decided I need a better way to back up my OS.
I would like to know which is the best and easiest to use Acronis True Image
or Symantec's Norton Ghost ?
Any useful comments would be welcome.
Foxhole

Ghost works fine but uses .NET framework which I feel is very
undesirable and will avoid to the bitter end.

Acronis is superb software, no problems, simple, does exactly what it
says on the tin, used if for months and restored several times.

No problems, no cryptic error messages - just works.

Jonah
 
S

shaka

Foxhole said:
I have XP Home on my computer and am useing XP's backup program and system
restore to keep out of trouble but after reading alot of post on this
newsgroup I have decided I need a better way to back up my OS.
I would like to know which is the best and easiest to use Acronis True Image
or Symantec's Norton Ghost ?
Any useful comments would be welcome.
Foxhole

I have used Acronis, Ghost 2003, Ghost 9, but they all had issues with
my RAID 0 setup. I discovered Paragon Drive Backup 7.0 and I have had
no problems since.

shaka
 
B

bearman

Foxhole said:
I have XP Home on my computer and am useing XP's backup program and system
restore to keep out of trouble but after reading alot of post on this
newsgroup I have decided I need a better way to back up my OS.
I would like to know which is the best and easiest to use Acronis True
Image
or Symantec's Norton Ghost ?
Any useful comments would be welcome.
Foxhole

I pretty much don't like anything Norton since Symantec bought it out.
Pity. Norton Utilities was a great program. I was a beta tester (one of
thousands, I'm sure) for V3.2 (I think).

I use True Image V8.0 (forgot which build) and couldn't be happier. I make
a clone once a month to a removable hard drive. I also make a full disk
image once a month to a drive in a USB enclosure (with weekly incremental
images). I've used the clone drive a couple of times when my main drive got
spyware laden. I've never tried to restore the image.
 
G

Guest

bearman said:
I pretty much don't like anything Norton since Symantec bought it out.
Pity. Norton Utilities was a great program. I was a beta tester (one of
thousands, I'm sure) for V3.2 (I think).

I use True Image V8.0 (forgot which build) and couldn't be happier. I make
a clone once a month to a removable hard drive. I also make a full disk
image once a month to a drive in a USB enclosure (with weekly incremental
images). I've used the clone drive a couple of times when my main drive got
spyware laden. I've never tried to restore the image.
Thank you everyone for taking your time to offer your comments and
suggestions.

Foxhole
 
L

Lil' Dave

Both have an Achilles heel, they are different, that most users will never
see.
Therefore, its your money, your choice.

Just bear in mind you need something to save the resulting image to. Cannot
be the partition XP is installed on, if restoring to same location.
 
G

Guest

I use TrueImage. An image file of my "C" drive (20 GB used) takes 8 minutes to create and 7 minutes to restore.

--
Just my 2¢ worth,
Jeff
__________in response to__________

|I have XP Home on my computer and am useing XP's backup program and system
| restore to keep out of trouble but after reading alot of post on this
| newsgroup I have decided I need a better way to back up my OS.
| I would like to know which is the best and easiest to use Acronis True Image
| or Symantec's Norton Ghost ?
| Any useful comments would be welcome.
| Foxhole
 
T

The Cuddly Curmudgeon

I used Norton's Ghost for years, but switched to True Image about a
year ago.

I heartily recommend True Image.
 
G

Guest

The Cuddly Curmudgeon said:
I used Norton's Ghost for years, but switched to True Image about a
year ago.

I heartily recommend True Image.


Again I thank everyone for taking time to post your comments and suggestions.
Foxhole
 
G

Guest

Lil' Dave said:
Both have an Achilles heel, they are different, that most users will never
see.
Therefore, its your money, your choice.

Just bear in mind you need something to save the resulting image to. Cannot
be the partition XP is installed on, if restoring to same location.

I will be backing up to external hard drive and dvd as I do now using XP's
backup utility. Thanks to all.
Foxhole
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top