A DEFINITION OF FREEWARE

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr. Jai Maharaj
  • Start date Start date
Man was able to go from Europe to the Americas via the ICE from
the ice age. It bridged vast areas of land.

No. Perhaps you are thinking of the theory that there was migration
from Siberia to North America via a land route exposed due to low sea
levels during that ice age?
 
No I mean what I say...


»Q« said:
No. Perhaps you are thinking of the theory that there was migration
from Siberia to North America via a land route exposed due to low sea
levels during that ice age?
 
Terry said:
Just in case anyone needs to know
OE
tools
message rules
news
news
where the from line contains www.mantra
delete it
Uhhhh...best to use wild cards for this chamelon dipstick! BTW not
using OE but the peepot overfloweth with this dipstick's trash.
 
By filling up your children with hippocrate lies and conflicting
bullshit and false promises from the bible, you create sex criminals.

--
Two ways to improve your life.
1. Turn off the TV.
2. Throw it out the window.

Vlad the Impaler
 
»Q« said:
No. Perhaps you are thinking of the theory that there was migration
from Siberia to North America via a land route exposed due to low sea
levels during that ice age?


Yes. The Indians in the south came from the icened parts near Indonesia
and New Zealand... Or they were always there, as an other human-ape
which parted away, together with the mother worlds Pangea. Because
scientists have found older bones in middle America than the Iceage
was!?



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
they were not always there... the dna shows they have direct relation to all
other men.
 
John said:
they were not always there... the dna shows they have direct relation
to all other men.


Are you sure? So far I know is any Human related to an other. The most
deviating homo, from Homo sapiens and Homo sapiens sapiens, was the
Neanderthalensis (Europe Asia-Spain), Antecessor (Spain) and Floriensis
(Java).

How can you take DNA from bones?



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
No dna from bones needed. All men alive today from every region of the world
carry the same Y chromosome mutation, that was passed on from a common
ancestor. This has been traced back to a man about 40-60.000 years ago.

This means that the human race then was at a point of extiction leaving
small numbers of humans alive, but this persons decendants survived and
populated the world.

These are very recent studies.

See these links for more information:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Genographic_Project
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Adam
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_Wells
http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail255.html
http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/chapters/i7442.html
http://www.pbs.org/aboutpbs/news/20010726_journeyeinstein.html
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0713996250/026-1400834-2852432
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/12/1212_021213_journeyofman.html
 
Science through genetics (study of Y chromosome mutations) has proved that
40.000 years ago, all man had the same forefather.
The scientists call him "scientific Adam". He probably originated somewhere
in Africa near Tasmania.

A small nit, but Tasmania isn't in Africa at all.
 
As a few of you may've noticed;

"Doc" Jay has been plastering my name and un-munged email address in
some Subject Headers (eg "Re: Another sympathizer of Muslim terrorists
revealed - (e-mail address removed) (Craig 'the stud' Olofson)."

If you wouldn't mind...pretty please, consider removing my name &
un-munged email address when replying to this crackpot's caca. In
particular, the email address is starting to attract flies. <g>

tia,
-Craig
 
John said:
No dna from bones needed. All men alive today from every region of
the world carry the same Y chromosome mutation, that was passed on
from a common ancestor. This has been traced back to a man about
40-60.000 years ago.

This means that the human race then was at a point of extiction
leaving small numbers of humans alive, but this persons decendants
survived and populated the world.

These are very recent studies.

Yeah. Studies also say that the Homo Neanderthalensis could be found in
his/her pure form, 20,000 years ago. They also found a new charge of
technology inventions, 20,000 years ago... Have you ever compared tools
from Neanderthalensis? The tools are almost perfect :-), nicely edged
and symmetric.

The most related pre-homo to Homo Sapiens is the Homo Ergaster, IMO,
who settled all four directions....



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
Yeah. Studies also say that the Homo Neanderthalensis could be found in
his/her pure form, 20,000 years ago. They also found a new charge of
technology inventions, 20,000 years ago... Have you ever compared tools
from Neanderthalensis? The tools are almost perfect :-), nicely edged
and symmetric.

Well ... the Soultrean "died out" around 19kya, but there are some who
maintain that Clovis technology is just Soultrean technology a little
later and a little more advanced.

And what of the almost hybrids they found years ago in Israel?
 
The Christian church is infested with priests who
commit sex crimes by raping both children and adults.

The Indian subcontinent is infested with men who rape their wives.
That's even worse.
 
I did not provide the links as "evidence" but as a means for daniel to read
about it,
and if he is interested he can go on from there.
 
Al said:
Soultrean


Not bad! Neanderthaler tools are even better. :-))
http://lithiccastinglab.com/gallery-pages/cloviswheredidcomefrompage1.ht
m


I think many Indians have Neanderthaler borrowings, too. Forget that
DNA stuff.... any kind of Human can be seen without technical helpo.

Especially the morone.... WHO GAVE THEM ALL THAT HIGH-TEC TOYS !!!!? :)




Your remind of clovis technology revealed some links for me, explaining
the settlement of America... 12-14,000 years. I thought about 8,000 y
b.C., but that was just the peak of settlement in that Time. Or was the
peak not much earlier :-) ?=





Kind Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
Not personally.... but I must say this is absolutely sh...


One single man in Africa, 60,000 y ago. :-)))

60.000 y ago, the homo in Europe already lived in tents and
block-houses!




Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
John said:
I did not provide the links as "evidence" but as a means for daniel
to read about it, and if he is interested he can go on from there.

Thanks, I watched a bit.

I have my most Infos from the latest GEO Magazine. I am a big
Neanderthaler enthusiast and like the Moron at most without technology
:). At least w/o tech he/she have not invented.


Internet standard-sites are tending to warp actualities.





Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
Back
Top