3D Test results seem low

[Rev Marc]

Any opinions?
====================
3DMark Score 4895 3DMarks

CPU Score 523.0 CPUMarks

Feature Tests

Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 1469.4 MTexels/s

Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2279.3 MTexels/s

Vertex Shader 15.7 fps

Pixel Shader 2.0 44.5 fps

Ragtroll 21.0 fps

--------------------------------------

System Configuration

Operating System Microsoft Windows XP

DirectX Version 9.0b

Mobo Manufacturer MICRO-STAR INC.

Mobo Model MS-6742

AGP Rates (Current/Available) 8x / 4x, 8x

CPU Intel Pentium 4 2400 MHz

FSB 200 MHz

Memory 512 MB

Display Information

Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON 9800 PRO

Driver Name RADEON 9800 PRO

Driver Version 6.14.10.6387

Driver WHQL Certified Yes

Video Memory 128 MB

Core Clock 324 MHz

Memory Clock 290 MHz

Sound Information

Sound Adapter Driver Name C-Media Wave Device

Sound Adapter Driver Version 5.12.1.29

Benchmark Settings

Program Version 3DMark03 Revision 2 Build 0

Resolution 1024x768@32 bit

Texture Filtering Optimal

Pixel Processing / Antialiasing None

Post Processing false

Vertex Shaders Optimal

 

[Guest]

Any opinions?

You should use the online result browser.

 

[Rev Marc]

Isnt there a fee for that?

thx

You should use the online result browser.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble (e-mail address removed) & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

 

[Rev Marc]

*For some unkown reasons, windows and various utilities identify the VC Card
as a 9800 Pro when it is only the 9800 model (not Pro). See asterisks for
corrections!

 

[Skid]

No fee, but understand when you compare that most of the really high scores
for systems like yours will have the video card overclocked close to
meltdown levels. At 324/290, yours is a 9800 non-pro.

Your scores are exactly where I would expect them to be.