Requiring the stats I asked for isn't asking too much to prove a point.
If he can't, then yes, I would say he would be wrong.
Terry, we are a privately held, closed corporation. Most all of our work
is done under NDA as it involves trade secrets and intellectual property
which is proprietary in nature. As such we only release statistical data
as required under agreements with clients or governments.
In all probability, our stats would have nothing to do with yours or
anyone’s else situation and would therefore be meaningless.
Anyway, real world testing is the only real test of how newly deployed
systems will function and those conditions and testing parameters are
exclusive in each case.
That's why we did side-by-side (with XP) evaluations.
Frank[/QUOTE]
Frank,
Governments? The one's I've read about aren't planning to "move
forward" any time soon. The "stats" I was asking for was how the
company came to the logical decision that "moving forward" to Vista was;
1. Beneficial
2. Cost effective
3. Productivity increase
4. ANY ROI
It doesn't matter what your company does. It's just that someone
boasting they've moved to Vista is only that, a boast. Nothing has been
gained by it. By the time XP is on it's way out, it will be a
completely different story. But making a corporate jump now isn't a
wise move IMO, and that opinion appears to be inline with the largest
corporations around the globe.
But if you're happy, that's all that matters I guess, isn't it.
--
Terry R.
***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.