Would any of you guys rate Helge’s Switchblade as "useful"

[Metspitzer]

Would any of you guys rate Helge’s Switchblade as "useful"
http://lifehacker.com/5977320/helge...ubleshooting-toolbox-that-fits-on-a-usb-drive

 

[Mike Easter]

Would any of you guys rate Helge’s Switchblade as "useful"
http://lifehacker.com/5977320/helge...ubleshooting-toolbox-that-fits-on-a-usb-drive

Yes.

That review must've been written about v.0.6 even tho' the article is
dated after the release of 0.7.

Here's a couple of forum entries which describe both .6 and .7 which are
significantly different.

http://malwaretips.com/Thread-Switchblade-a-portable-troubleshooting-toolkit


Comments at both lifehacker and malwaretips (also) mention Hiren's and
customizing Hiren's.

Readme for 0.7 at download site:

CHANGELOG 10.01.2013

Updates:
* Updated layout
* Removed all copyright infringing programs & replaced them with open
source or freeware alternatives
* Minor Bug Fixes
* Code Cleanup


The gradual evolution of Hiren's has also led to a lot of changes in the
philosophy of using copyright infringers (or not), altho' Hiren's has
moved much more slowly in that direction than Switchblade.

The newer switchblade dl has shrunk from 220 megs to 45, but still has a
lot of stuff.

 

[Flasherly]

Would any of you guys rate Helge’s Switchblade as "useful

Because remote potential, I guess, is a chance by way of alternatives
to being in debt to pockets of software obsolescence and malfeasance
intended to skirt laws in order to exercise hegemony and tyranny while
locked in practices of purely monopolistic gain. Being nothing is
actually invested if publicly sourced material is provided,
furthermore, associatively implicit is a sense of worthless effort
indulged over any benefit derived, as it were, if physical assets
conversely are stated within the goal provision and immediate
management strategies from an aforementioned scenario. As starkly as
might it sound for one withal by means from scratch to build a
functional computer, by contrast rather than what limited
conceptualization is to rent to own a corner computer Buddy-Buy-Rite
most certainly will provide.

 

[Geoff Pearson]

Because remote potential, I guess, is a chance by way of alternatives
to being in debt to pockets of software obsolescence and malfeasance
intended to skirt laws in order to exercise hegemony and tyranny while
locked in practices of purely monopolistic gain. Being nothing is
actually invested if publicly sourced material is provided,
furthermore, associatively implicit is a sense of worthless effort
indulged over any benefit derived, as it were, if physical assets
conversely are stated within the goal provision and immediate
management strategies from an aforementioned scenario. As starkly as
might it sound for one withal by means from scratch to build a
functional computer, by contrast rather than what limited
conceptualization is to rent to own a corner computer Buddy-Buy-Rite
most certainly will provide.

What is this thread about?

 

[Flasherly]

What is this thread about?

Less of a diminutive context given extant copyrights to utilities few
if any still use, but by peril and leeway from active pursuit of
exceptions to infringement to ensure that greater apparency is within
such insular closure without intent or principle apprehensible in what
narrower egalitarian strictures conceivably have then to suggest;- as
a polity altogether too preposterous to be anything but incredulous
quite rightly reflects a normative reasoning over ensured rights to do
so.