Mike Hall (MS-MVP) said:
David
FYI.. Temporary Internet Files are stored here..
C:\Documents and Settings\username\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files
Thanks again,
So navigating to the directory tree and going to C: | Windows | Temp | TIF
will show nothing?
It's no wonder I'm having a bit of a problem. It seems that the "username"
approach to things is going to be a learning curve for me. I just posted a
new question regarding that after reading this. His OEM system did not
include an XP manual.
To make them visible, go to FOLDER OPTIONS in Control Panel.. click on the
VIEW tab, and check the box 'show hidden files and folders'
That of course, was one of the first things I did after the client called me out
earlier in the week.... can't examine what you can't see.
By the way, he trusts me implicitly and knows full well that I am essentially
learning on his machine. He *wants* me to know the OS... and although I
am personally a little resistant, I understand that it's the best thing for me
to do. There will be times that I need help, and I'd like to come here for that.
I don't mean to be gruff or brusk, but I _am_ going to address your reply.
After doing whatever you have planned, reset back to hidden unless you want
your customer to screw even more stuff up..
I'll see it again on Sunday, but at 62, he's really pretty harmless. He just
wants his mail, his news, his personal music recordings (he's a musician,
not a downloader), and the ability to pay some bills on and surf the net.
The way to get experience of XP is NOT to try things out on somebody else's
computer, especially a computer that is only two weeks old.. your experience
of XP and general attitude towards it will preclude you from advancing a
great deal.. computer users who come in here postulating about how bad XP is
generally end up making fools of themselves simply on the basis that there
are many more out there that have a great time with XP..
Please consider me an exception to the rule. I don't like change, but I
obviously don't resist learning. I resist those who tell me that I shouldn't.
My friend, my client, has asked me to do this... it is not your place to
tell me that (we) he is wrong in doing that as a response to my original
inquiry.
The one thing that you have to realise is that XP is not a minor advancement
on the old Win 9x family.. it is a very different animal.. that said, many
of the functions remain similar as far as the user is concerned..
I noted how much was similar, which is why I assumed that I could quickly
find his TIFs and save the files he wanted before cleaning the cache. The
multiple-user and security advances appear to be my immediate stumbling
blocks.
You make points about it being bloated and running far more than it should
behind the scenes.. but the services don't run unless the user installs
software that utilises them.. they are part of the XP's support, nothing
more..
I've been a little put off because my main gig is audio, and XP users in
my field report of reverting to 2K or 98SE in order to guarantee glitch-free
work until better streamlining tactics are discovered. Their main problem
is the running background tasks, and multiple critical pieces of hardware
resting on single IRQs without the ease of ability to change that. I'm sure
it will work out and people will find ways to optimize the system for audio.
A fellow in my regular audio group, complained just today that he had *60*
running processes at bootup. I dare not ask him how many he had after
a day's work.
There, in a nutshell, is my reason for not having already upgraded myself.
Please, don't condemn me for wanting to dig beyond the surface of the
machine and into the heart of the OS. My friend trusts me and I need
to learn the system... it's a mutual arrangement. This shouldn't even
be a an issue, let alone a problem for you.
The system tray works the way it does to save room for other things.. it
takes less than a minute to get used to it.. that is what I would have told
the guy.. and over the course of a week, he would realise that it is a
better way too..
All he said was, "I hate this thing hiding what's in my system tray, can you
fix it?" So, I did. Not to sadden you, but we also eliminated about 35%
of what was residing there. This whole process is being made more
difficult for us both because of the huge amount of superfluous OEM
software that came pre-loaded into the machine.
Re Nero and Sony Sound Forge.. if the user can't handle the system tray
(notification area) as XP presents it, he doesn't have a hope in hell of
working Sony Soundforge..
I tought him these pieces years ago. He's bought newer versions than
even I have... (and I wouldn't like having my systray partly invisible either ;-)
So... I suppose hell is upon us, because he can use this software well.
In my opinion, removing Nero was a mistake..
We haven't removed it yet, but I'm pretty certain that it's going away, along
with another piece of audio software that was thrown in by Fry's... all it
seems to want to do is access the internet and it's truly a simpleton's
toy for music downloading (facilitating theft & piracy). He doesn't need it.
What he needed was an XP manual.
Examining TIF files?.. why?
I've already explained that in the previous post. I'm not a believer in the
"ignorance is bliss" approach. You knpw full well what can be garnered
from those files... or Steve Gibson would still be a pauper.
.. and playing MP3's from the TIF folder?..
why?.. one of the first things to do when suffering slow internet access is
to delete TIF's.. I have dialup here too, but I have never thought to run
anything from that folder.. items are never there long enough..
I think you misunderstood me. The files weren't to be run from there,
they were to be saved from there. He ran them for me by clicking on the
links (while off-line) in the e-mails from which he originally obtained the
stuff. The OS will always check the cache before it attempts to connect,
no? I merely wanted to save those items so that I *could* clear his cache.
You must understand how many service calls are finished in 10 minutes
by clearing the TIFs, the history and running AdAware, right? OK... I wasn't
I feel sorry for the guy that you are supporting..
You know nothing about the guy I am supporting... or me.
I'm sorry, but this is totally RUDE and uncalled for BULL on your part !
he has had his XP
computer for just two weeks, and it's a mess already.. I don't doubt he
played his part, but to then be helped by somebody who also doesn't have the
first clue re. XP?..
Why the devil do you suppose I'm here, Mr. Congeniality?
Thanks for the "SUPPORT".
why can't people just leave things alone and use a
computer productively instead of messing and tweaking on the advice of the
expert next door?..
Why can't respected MSMVPs be a bit less condescending and simply stick
to aswering the questions, no matter how dumb they may be ?
FWIW, I drive almost 60 miles one way to see this man.
Expert next door.... sheeesh....
Geez Mike, you sound like a man who's afraid of losing his gig or something!
They must pay you a lot more than I thought around here. ;-)
For the life of me I can't understand why you continue to call me (and my
friend) fools for wanting to understand why a clock goes tic-tok when you
wind it. If you yourself had not experimented exactly as I have in this case,
and in general with PCs for the past 15 years, you wouldn't be the one
giving the advice.... at least I certainly hope not.
there is nothing worse than a
person with negative preconceptions of an OS fixing or attempting to
customize a product that he/she doesn't understand..
From my viewpoint, there's nothing worse than a person who claims to
represent the best interests of Microsoft who has nothing better to respond
with than by essentially saying, "You're Stupid", "Your friend is stupid" and
that there's nothing we need to explain to you except, "Don't touch it, just
use it."
in all honesty, XP is
not difficult to understand once a user forgets that it is not a Win 9x type
OS.. as said, many, many single users exist out there who know nothing of
problems with XP because they don't get any..
I'm sure you're correct, so I won't let the number of posts in the XP groups
or their content sway me into believeing anything other than 'It Is Perfect'.
<Big Smiley Here for above and below>
At least I'm relatively certain that XP will not go the way of WinME, and the
help I got there was faaar more offensive... so I still like you for the moment.
Seriously, I appreciate you finally giving me the file path to the TIFs, regardless
of the chastizing in the interim; and I'd like to come back on ocassion, looking for
someone who's willing to understand that there are other people in the world
who care about the nuts and bolts (what an awful program that was) of things.
If you or anybody else out there thinks that I have been unfair, then so be
it,
Fine... The only problem is, you basically told me I should crash and burn
and that one of my best friends was an absolute fool for letting me, another
absolute fool (simply because like everyone else in the world, I am just now
starting to work with XP), get inside his OEM XP system... before you ever
offered me any constructive help. I appreciate the subsequent interaction. I
also understand how far-fetched my assumption was that a file association
could have caused a change in the action taken by the .dat file, but I simply
couldn't explain the TIF invisibility after having checked nearly all options and
preferences that would make them visible. FWIW, the file path you gave
me above is totally foreign to me (as is most of the OS), but I plan to learn
but this is how I see it.. computer users with no technical knowledge or
ability rely on those who claim they have both, and when the claims fall
short, it is time to say something..
First, your assumption that I have no technical knowledge is patently false.
To even insinuate that, while answering a question and serving under the
guise of "help and support" is the height of arrogance without basis.
Second, the only "claim" I make is that I need advice with XP.
Third, if coming to this group and posing a question is 'falling short', then
then I hope the attitude you've put forth here is just a wee bit embarrassing.
As I said, I'm not an XP whiz, but I will be... as will millions of others, and I
hope with your help and not your condescention.
Peace (and I mean it),
--
David Morgan (MAMS)
http://www.m-a-m-s DOT com
Morgan Audio Media Service
Dallas, Texas (214) 662-9901
_______________________________________
http://www.artisan-recordingstudio.com