D
Dan Dascalescu
What is the RAM configuration? How many slots?
2 slots, 1 2GB, 1 1GB.
That's... interesting. Why would XP cache more files in RAM when
there's less RAM available? I'm not saying it wouldn't be the case,
just that it would be odd.
I asked for 4G of RAM and the IT guy here said that XP would only
handle 3G. Not sure if that's true, but anyway, see below.
We're talking about one Firefox instance with 11 tabs and 3 gigs of
RAM. There is no conceivable way a sane operating system would need to
swap Firefox out to disk.
With Firefox having *100* tabs open, and Outlook loaded and a bunch of
other smaller apps, there's still a ton of RAM available. Process
Explorer shows in that case:
Physical Memory (K):
Total 3,136,876
Available 1,855,544
System Cache 429,244
So why doesn't XP use 2 gigabytes of RAM and instead grinds the hard
drive every time I run the same app again?
2 slots, 1 2GB, 1 1GB.
Try lowering to two sticks of the same size, say,
two 1GB sticks.. just as a test..
That's... interesting. Why would XP cache more files in RAM when
there's less RAM available? I'm not saying it wouldn't be the case,
just that it would be odd.
You might be able to mitigate the wait time by increasing RAM to the max
(about 4GB).
I asked for 4G of RAM and the IT guy here said that XP would only
handle 3G. Not sure if that's true, but anyway, see below.
In the second case, most of RAM is taken up by another program. When you
start Excel, the other program is rolled out to make room, a fresh copy of
Excel is loaded. Upon exiting Excel, the original program is rolled back in.
A subsequent invocation of Excel generates the same sequence (roll out
active program, start Excel).
We're talking about one Firefox instance with 11 tabs and 3 gigs of
RAM. There is no conceivable way a sane operating system would need to
swap Firefox out to disk.
With Firefox having *100* tabs open, and Outlook loaded and a bunch of
other smaller apps, there's still a ton of RAM available. Process
Explorer shows in that case:
Physical Memory (K):
Total 3,136,876
Available 1,855,544
System Cache 429,244
So why doesn't XP use 2 gigabytes of RAM and instead grinds the hard
drive every time I run the same app again?