You just convinced me not to buy Vista if, indeed, that's true. Thanks.
Fair enough. It's not going to be for everyone. However, this usually
makes people wonder about your (not you specifically but people that think
like this) intentions. I don't care if MS downloaded the entire WMI library
of your computer. Who cares? Nothing about that data is personal. They
can find out the same info by looking up your model. There is nothing
secret about your hardware.
It always comes down to the same two things:
1. WGA only affects thieves.
2. Unfortunately a small percentage of people are inconvenienced with a
PHONE CALL.
I believe SP2 contains WGA?
No, it doesn't. I have just installed an XP Pro SP2b and no WGA. You gotta
go to WU for that.
Ok, fair enough. I couldn't remember one way or another.
How special, MS fluffing off the failings of its programs on the OEMs.
No dude. The OEM version is pennies on the dollar. What do you expect? To
pay LESS and receive the same amount of service? Like I said, it's cheaper
for a reason. If OEMs want to pass back SERVICE to MS then they need to put
full retail versions on their machines. Which is an option. But gee, there
prices will sky rocket.
They don't report all the hardware on your computer or have the power to
shut your computer down.
MS can not shut your computer down. Your computer tells you that you MIGHT
NOT be genuine. I've had to get a few companies "legal" with XP. It was no
big deal. They got screwed either knowingly or not. I didn't care. Now
they're legal.
Calling it a High Priority update is what, then?
Not covert. "concealed; secret; disguised." If you KNOW about it then how
is it covert?
Seems sneaky to me when it is NOT a High Priority update.
Yes it is. Since when is theft a good thing? High priority to MS, no one
said they were high priority to the user.
No, just everything about the user's hardware.
Again, so? You could list the same data right here for the WORLD to know.
Who would care? What would it mater?
No, it only uses it to inconvenience paying customers. So, I guess it
would be better called "malware".
At least that would be the correct term. However, do you SERIOUSLY believe
that MS's intent is to "inconvenience paying customers?" Come on....
Again, that % is so low it's moot. Obviously not moot to those users
however I don't care where you live, odds are, TRAFFIC inconvenience you
more then having to pick up your phone.
Fine, I'll call it malware from now on. Happy?
Sure. That's your opinion. However, expect this:
1. The majority to disagree. (it goes both ways)
2. People will expect you to not purposely use malware. So they're going to
question your use of XP.
Personally, I LOVE WGA. Why?
1. It's never affected any of my machines. All my peers concur and that
totals thousands of machines.
2. When a small mom and pop shop calls because of the WGA message I get to
CHARGE people to BUY XP from me legally.