Why does the FX-55 (130nm) cost about $400 more than the Athlon 64 4000+ SanDiego 90nm?

D

Derek Baker

Nobody said:
So far, the only difference I can see is the FX-55 is 0.2GHz faster.
Click to expand...

It also has an unlocked multiplier.

It costs so much more because some people will pay that for it.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Video Editing? AMD Athlon 64FX-55 2.6ghz or Athlon 64X2 400?? 10
Why does Athlon XP 3200 cost more than Athlon 64 3200? 3
"Downgraded" FX-55 to X2 4600+ 2
Athlon 64 4000+ Clawhammer or San Diego??? 5
another quad (on the way) 5
Intel's 90nm shrink BETTER than their 130nm shrink? 34
Athlon 64 - Max memory 4GB? 14
Installing Windows XP on AMD Athlon 64 FX system 2

Top