B
Brian
Is it necessary to keep Windows Defender running if you've already got a
third-party antivirus and firewall running? Does Defender do anything
extra?
third-party antivirus and firewall running? Does Defender do anything
extra?
Brian said:Is it necessary to keep Windows Defender running if you've already got a
third-party antivirus and firewall running? Does Defender do anything
extra?
Brian said:Is it necessary to keep Windows Defender running if you've already got a
third-party antivirus and firewall running? Does Defender do anything
extra?
Is it necessary to keep Windows Defender running if you've already got a
third-party antivirus and firewall running? Does Defender do anything
extra?
Jupiter Jones said:Not quite true.
Windows Defender is to help protect against spyware and neither anti virus
or firewall do that.
There are 4 things needed to help keep the computer secure.
1. Antivirus
2. Firewall
3. Anti spyware
4. Keep Windows up to date (Windows Update).
While there is some overlap, all 4 are intended to protect the computer in
different ways.
Since they protect for different problems, this is not "layered
protection"
Layered protection is more like a router adding another layer of
protection to the firewall.
I agree with those two.
I don't agree with that one, because all one has to do is not put his or
herself and the machine in that position to have it happen.
I agree with those two.
I don't agree with that one, because all one has to do is not put his or
herself and the machine in that position to have it happen. I haven't used
any of it in years. All the stuff ever did was find cookies and the machine
cannot be attacked by cookies.
I'll agree with that.
I look at as anything that can be put on the machine to protect it for what
it's wroth.
The 5th element you left out is below.
But if he user doesn't have any common sense to practice safe hex, then
every last bit of it equals no protection.
The only thing that really protects against anything is the one sitting at
the wheel and doing the driving and using the proper tools, looking around
from time to time to see what's happening on the machine, because malware
can go around every last bit of it.
cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user) said:I'm begining to agree with this less and less, as the line between
"nice" commercial malware and "nasty" traditional malware gets
blurred. Traditional av still often ignores commercial malware, which
is often no longer pretending to be "legit" (and thus easy to avoid or
remove), so the risk is increasing.
I still don't like to add an active "underfootware" scanner that does
what av does, but I would retain Defender, and to that I would add
Spyware Blaster. The latter does not run all the time, but confers
"static" protection by populating Restricted Zone, cookie kill-lists
etc. with entries for known "bad guys".
Note 1: There are 200+ fake "antispyware" apps out there, avoid them
all! Free "legit" ones include AdAware, Spybot, A-Squared and AVG
Antispyware (what used to be Ewido).
Most of the latter rely on exploitable code defects, hence the advice
to keep patched and use a firewall. But sometimes bad guys find and
use exploits before the good guys find and fix them, and sometimes a
yawning defect is left open because it "works as designed".
It can take YEARS to get a design defect fixed - just look at the age
of MS Office macro malware, starting before VBA and ending only quite
recently (well, becoming less common, at least).
Safe hex is like all these other tips; an essential part of defense,
but no substitute for a lack of any or all of the others.
"cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)" wrote in
But the machine has to be put at risk. If the machine is never put into a
risk position and one is aware of the risks, then running of those solutions
have no value, IMHO.
But of course, one has to know what he or she is doing
in this area and know what those risks are to avoid the risks.
I am very aware, as I could turn bad guy with ease, since I have been
programming professionally since 1980. But I am a nice guy.
I think if you posted this into a Security and Firewall NG you may get a lot
of opposition about solutions like Ad-Aware, Spybot, WD, etc, etc.
If one knows how to protect and not to put the machine at risk, then for
someone like that, the solutions are of no value.
On the 'net, *everyone* can hear you scream---------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
Brian said:Is it necessary to keep Windows Defender running if you've already got a
third-party antivirus and firewall running? Does Defender do anything
extra?
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.