SNIP
Even if calibration can be sorted, or solved through work-
around of pre-calibrate through Minolta Scan Utility, I would
like to see him do SOMETHING about the current state of
Vuescan cleaning. Not sure if it's specific to my Elite 5400,
or a problem with other scanners as well:
Part of it *is* specific to the DSE-5400 in general, or more specific
the much higher resolution. 'Filling in the blanks' is much easier if
the area to be filled is a few pixels. That could e.g. be done with a
median blur of surrounding pixels. With the DSE-5400 the defects are
82% larger than with a good 4000 ppi scanner, which calls for a better
(slower) algorithm than for almost all other scanners.
Of course it is Ed's choice to either do it right or not. There may be
a couple of group contributers that could help with suggestions (I'm
thinking about an enhanced type of Gaussian Pyramid interpolation),
but without him paticipating in this group it would take a lot of
effort to get the info (and associated sense of urgency, and award)
across.
Working with 64 bit Vuescan raw file, setting the cleaning
filter to light, medium, or heavy, I see progressively cleaner
image in preview.
However, when I save at ANY of these levels, the result is
roughly the same, cleaning at a level about half way
between light and none.
I never use anything stronger than light cleaning, but what you
describe seems easy to reproduce for Ed, so if he can he could change
some of the threshold settings.
Have you reported it to him? It won't change without him knowing it.
Bart