Vista Minimum System Requirements are Wishful Thinking

G

Guest

I don't know if that last comment was directed or me or not. There were a
few posts about Macs from various people, but just in case it was directed at
me:

I was joking.

I guess you didn't get that part, the humor one. It was admittedly subtle.
"Nuance" being the operative here. I mean one can honestly get behind a
special police force just to investigate Mac users. Yeah. Okay. Did you
know that "gullible" isn't in the dictionary? Really, it isn't. Go ahead,
look it up, use any dictionary you like. It won't be in there.
 
G

Guest

Good point. Indeed I did just what you describe. Having run the indexer in
RC1 I was even more clever than that.

I started by unchecking all the various file types I didn't want to index,
knowing that with every type I removed it would want to reindex every folder
set to be indexed. So with just the personal folders set I removed all kinds
file categories. Then I told it what folders I wanted indexed. There were
probably in the neighborhood of 1.3M files spread over 2.5TB.

Maybe Vista can't handle that volume of data. If so, its a shame, because
Vista's "little brother" XP Pro x64 has no problem with the same set of data.
 
G

Guest

I know you weren't gloating. It was late. I was joking. See, that was the
joke, the fact that you weren't gloating, and yet I accused you of gloating!
Oh, sure, those blessed with gifts in other areas than pure intelligence may
not have seen that, but trust me, I did!

I here you about the Macintosh interface. Heavy users swear by it, but when
you go from Windows to Mac, intuitive the Mac isn't.

DOS 3.nn was a great O.S. I still have several copies on 1.2MB floppies.
Good stuff. 5 was better still, and of course 6, 6.22 was THE DOS version.
That was right around when Windows started getting going, I guess must have
been around 1989 plus or minus.

You been around like me! And dBase! Did you know Wayne Ratliff? I don't
know if you know the story of the start of dBase, or the name Ashton Tate,
but here you go: the genesis of dBase was Wayne needed a simple little
database program to run the football pool at JPL (Jet Propulsion
Laboratories) in Pasadena. The rudiments of dBase was the result of that
need. Wayne, being one of these lofty scientist types figured he could quit
the cushy science gig at JPL and start his own software company. Why not.
That was the start of Ashton Tate. Except, of course, there was no Ashton.
Some marketing firm told them the name "Ashton" sounded more official, and so
Ashton was grafted on. Eventually the company bought a parrot, named it
Ashton, and said it was THE Ashton. I never worked there, but I know several
people who did, including one of my very best buddies who wrote their
compiler. He intially wrote it for himself, 'cause he was a dBase fanatic,
Ashton Tate got wind of it, and so they had to go and hire the guy that wrote
a compiler for their product. It's a good thing they lived in the same town.
Them were the days! Back then computers were hard and mean and no
compromise affairs. O.S. were difficult because they were supposed to be.
Computers weren't easy, video games were easy. Computers were difficult and
only the best and brightest could understand them. I've always contended
that making these things difficult doesn't secure you a loyal following of
engineers, it just opens the door to competition from someone who is willing
to make something both technologically innovative, and easy to use.
Microsoft has made billions following Randy's 3rd law of computing. Cisco is
learning about the law now. For years there has been that elite core of CLI
snobs. Cisco successfully beat Bay in the early 90's to dominate routing
(with a little help from Boeing, who of course instructed Cisco on what they
really needed to develop and essentially made Cisco who they eventually
became), but we see now competitors like Juniper successfully challenging
that dominance by making both technologically innovative products and
products that are easy to use.

I'm glad you appreciate the humor! While my comments about performance were
factual, you picked up some of the editorializing was to bring some levity to
the situation. It takes a sharp mind, a good eye, and a keen wit to pick up
on that, and you, my friend, obviously possess all three. It is truly a
rarified breed that is able to walk among the seething throng, yet
simultaneously be somewhere above it.

All my verbage and hasn't been lost, as at least one soul "get's it."

Cheers.
 
G

Guest

I'm thinking we're on to something here, except I neglected to download the
x86 version when I downloaded the x64 version. I'll continue to look for a
link to the x86 RC2.

I mean, if there is an x64 issue it should be addressed before release
rather than after.
 
L

Lang Murphy

One would hope... regarding before/after. In the meantime, look for x86.
If'n you can't find it, reply to me, not the NG, and we'll see what can be
done...

Lang
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top