K
kurttrail
Donald said:John, you should know better!
Actually, it seems he does.
The watch word here is NOT "should", it is "MUST", since it is REQUIRED
if he wants his second instance to be a LEGAL one.
According to MS. However, the last time I checked Microsoft is not the
prevailing legal authority in this or any other country.
So anyone that does know and understand this doesn't speak in absolute
terms when it comes to the conflicting rights of the individual in their
own home, as opposed to the rights of a copyright owner in that
individual's home.
Absolutes are for the faithful, not for those who are reasonable.
Hell, I don't even agree with John's "should" but I do respect him for
being reasonable enough to acknowledge the legal gray area.
To transfer a license for ANY Windows OS onto a SECOND machine while it
is still on the first one, the EULA REQUIRES that the FIRST instance
MUST be COMPLETELY REMOVED (i.e., "deleted").
Yep. And MS's EULA is worth about as much as the paper it's not written
on, when it comes to private non-commercial use.
No copyright owner has any right to know what I do with my copy of
legally & anonymously purchased copyrighted content in the privacy of my
own home. There is no law that says some corporation that sold me a
copy of a copyrighted work is the king of my castle.
You have every right to subject yourself to Microsoft Rule in your home,
but that ain't happening in mine.
Give me FREEDOM, or give me death! I shall never compromise MY rights
in MY home for ANY corporation EVER!
I can see why you call yourself an "associate expert". You simply
aren't "expert" enough to be a REAL one, apparently.
Since you are only expert in being a conformist, who gives a flying f*ck
what you believe to be apparent?
--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"