vexira antivirus program

[Stephen Larivee]

I have been asked to look into an antivirus program to use for a public
school system. It is at www.centralcommand.com and it is called Vexira. I
had never heard of it. Has anyone used it? Does anyone have any feedback
on the plusses or minusses with this program?

Currently we are using Symantec Enterprise, but someone told me that this
Vexira program was able to detect viruses more thoroughly than Symantec. I
am skeptical!!

Thanks in advance

 

[Carey Frisch [MVP]]

Better Choice:
http://www.ca.com/

--
Carey Frisch
Microsoft MVP
Windows - Shell/User
Microsoft Community Newsgroups
news://msnews.microsoft.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------­----------------

:

| I have been asked to look into an antivirus program to use for a public
| school system. It is at www.centralcommand.com and it is called Vexira. I
| had never heard of it. Has anyone used it? Does anyone have any feedback
| on the plusses or minusses with this program?
|
| Currently we are using Symantec Enterprise, but someone told me that this
| Vexira program was able to detect viruses more thoroughly than Symantec. I
| am skeptical!!
|
| Thanks in advance

 

[Stephen Larivee]

Better working?? Or is the cost better??

 

[Guest]

This Vexira seems suspicious and is probably malicious so don't use it.

Of course Symantec is better than that.

Panda_man

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

I have been asked to look into an antivirus program to use for a
public school system. It is at www.centralcommand.com and it is
called Vexira. I had never heard of it. Has anyone used it? Does
anyone have any feedback on the plusses or minusses with this program?

Currently we are using Symantec Enterprise, but someone told me that
this Vexira program was able to detect viruses more thoroughly than
Symantec. I am skeptical!!

Never heard of it. It sounds like something for erectile dysfunction.

On their web site, under :"Latest Vexira Updates," it says 02/03/2006. If it
hasn't been updated in a month, it has to be among the worst products
available. The key to successful anti-virus protection is frequent updates.
Any decent program will have at least daily updates. I use Avast, and it's
already had two updates today.

 

[mastertek17]

A little insite.
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

A little insite.
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/

Insite [sic]? Insight into what? Vexira isn't even listed on that page.

 

[Stephen Larivee]

I agree about Vexira not being included, but maybe that says something about
the product??? I don't think anyone on this board, including myself, has
ever heard of this product before my posting. That in itself makes me wary
of it.

I thank everyone for taking some time to offer their input.

A little insite.
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/

Insite [sic]? Insight into what? Vexira isn't even listed on that page.

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

I agree about Vexira not being included, but maybe that says
something about the product??? I don't think anyone on this board,
including myself, has ever heard of this product before my posting. That
in itself makes me wary of it.

To me even more important than who has or hasn't heard of it is the lack of
frequency of their updates. That completely rules it out of consideration,
as far as I'm concerned.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup

I thank everyone for taking some time to offer their input.

A little insite.
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/

Insite [sic]? Insight into what? Vexira isn't even listed on that
page. --
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User

 

[HillBillyBuddhist]

Never heard of it. It sounds like something for erectile dysfunction.

lol

For infections lasting more than four hours...

--

 

[Stephen Larivee]

I took a closer look at the date. It is shown as 02/03/2006 but under that
it says dd/mm/yyyy so it apparently is March 2, not February 3

I agree about Vexira not being included, but maybe that says
something about the product??? I don't think anyone on this board,
including myself, has ever heard of this product before my posting. That
in itself makes me wary of it.

To me even more important than who has or hasn't heard of it is the lack
of frequency of their updates. That completely rules it out of
consideration, as far as I'm concerned.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup

I thank everyone for taking some time to offer their input.

mastertek17 wrote:

A little insite.
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/




Insite [sic]? Insight into what? Vexira isn't even listed on that
page. --
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

I took a closer look at the date. It is shown as 02/03/2006 but
under that it says dd/mm/yyyy so it apparently is March 2, not
February 3

Thanks, that sounds much better. But if I were them, I'd say either March 2,
2006 or 2 March, 2006, not 02/03/2006. That's just an invitation for people
to get confused.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup

I agree about Vexira not being included, but maybe that says
something about the product??? I don't think anyone on this board,
including myself, has ever heard of this product before my posting.
That in itself makes me wary of it.

To me even more important than who has or hasn't heard of it is the
lack of frequency of their updates. That completely rules it out of
consideration, as far as I'm concerned.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup

I thank everyone for taking some time to offer their input.



mastertek17 wrote:

A little insite.
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/




Insite [sic]? Insight into what? Vexira isn't even listed on that
page. --
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User

 

[Stephen Larivee]

I agree. Very misleading.

I took a closer look at the date. It is shown as 02/03/2006 but
under that it says dd/mm/yyyy so it apparently is March 2, not
February 3

Thanks, that sounds much better. But if I were them, I'd say either March
2, 2006 or 2 March, 2006, not 02/03/2006. That's just an invitation for
people to get confused.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup

Stephen Larivee wrote:

I agree about Vexira not being included, but maybe that says
something about the product??? I don't think anyone on this board,
including myself, has ever heard of this product before my posting.
That in itself makes me wary of it.


To me even more important than who has or hasn't heard of it is the
lack of frequency of their updates. That completely rules it out of
consideration, as far as I'm concerned.

--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup


I thank everyone for taking some time to offer their input.



mastertek17 wrote:

A little insite.
http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/




Insite [sic]? Insight into what? Vexira isn't even listed on that
page. --
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User

 

[Martin Foster]

Never heard of it. It sounds like something for erectile dysfunction.

On their web site, under :"Latest Vexira Updates," it says 02/03/2006.
If it hasn't been updated in a month, it has to be among the worst
products
available.

Pay attention to the date format!