S
Steve N.
chrispsg said:I think this portion comes down to profit. Customer takes PC to System
Builder for component upgrade. If the upgrade meets the Microsoft criteria
of new computer. System Builder aquires new OEM License from MS...System
Builder sells new license because of Microsoft's defintion of a new
computer. $$$$
Think of it this way. If everyone upgraded their computer forever w/o
buying a new one...the only static part being the case.. and MS defined the
case as a new computer...They would not make any money. How will a case ever
be defective? Unless you drop a refrigerator on it. The oem license would be
pretty much like a per seat license. Tied to a person not specific
equipment.
So.. They define something that people will have to either change or replace
probably once in the lifetime of the computer. If they never have to replace
the mobo.. so MS doesnt lose any money because the person will just buy
another PC.. Probably with an OEM version of Windows.....
Anyone agree/disagree????
psg
Well, I agree basically, but I am the kind who upgrades hardware first
and OS last and I only upgrade if my actual computing needs/wants
warrant it, and never for the sake of keeping up with the tehnological
Joneses. The exception is when trying out new Linux distros but I don't
consider that upgrading, just switching and experimenting.
I'm certainly not against MS making their fair share of money, I don't
agree with a lot of their tactics, strategies and obvious push to
dominate computer users, though. It's not their right to tell me or
anyone else what constitutes MY computer, which is my point.
Steve