L
Leythos
Able to elaborate, or are you restricted to 5 word comments by the
authorities?
I think it was clear to all of us in the group that have been ethical
and honest employees, managers, and business owners.
Able to elaborate, or are you restricted to 5 word comments by the
authorities?
Phillip Windell said:Just guessing,...but maybe Jon and Bob have been fired a time or two over
abusing their usage rights and just have a chip on their shoulder. This
whole theory X & Y thing is just psycho-babble to me. I live in the real
world, and in the real world, people will do whatever they think they can
get away with.
Just my opinion....
Leythos said:And it would appear, (sorry, I snipped the rest of your post since your
bent can be derived from the part I quoted) that you are an employee
level and not a business owner or manager.
Working for Wand-TV your vested interests are clear in perpetuating the myth
of the suspicious "could-be-a-crook" employee that you in the
corporate-controlled media are paid to exploit on a daily basis.
You deduce wrongly.
Leythos said:Your posts show that I'm right.
Actually that's less than completely true. The legal
principle involved is called "respondeat superior" and imposes
a certain amount of vicarious liability on an employer.
Jon said:Certainly right-wing. Beyond that, no
Ok, well (unllike some of other comments I could mention) this is both
interesting and informative. Not being a lawyer too, I subsequently found a
good article on Wikipedia that explains this legal term 'respondeat
superior'. Hopefully 'Wikipedia' will continue to remain on the list of
websites that are "approved" for the general masses ;-)
Respondeat superior
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respondeat_superior
You are very wrong, having done this for decades myself.
Jon, my job as a network engineer and security expert is to protect the
company (clients) from all manner of threats.
You appear to be a disgruntled employee that (like the kids today)
believes the Employer OWES you something other than a pay-check - they
don't.
Possible. I was going for "still in college" myself but you could be
correct...
+Bob+ said:No, you are wrong. But don't take my word for it. Go educate yourself
at Harvard, or Yale, or the Sloan school and see what they teach you.
If you want to work for a company that does everything the way you want
it, allows all the abuse of company resources, costs the company money
for your personal freedom, then start your own company and watch it
fail.
No, you are wrong. But don't take my word for it. Go educate yourself
at Harvard, or Yale, or the Sloan school and see what they teach you.
You appear to be an ignorant, home grown business person who doesn't
have a clue about proper management. Classic "theory x - employees
will are lazy and don't want to work unless closely supervised".
As for theory-x and theory-y being psycho-babble to you: It's not
surprising that you can't understand it as you're drowning in your own
ignorance.
I've a better idea: Try educating yourself by getting a job and seeing
how actual employees and managers actually behave, rather than relying
on academic theories.
The combined experience of the most successful companies in the world
directly contradicts your uneducated assumption about people and how
to get maximum productivity from them.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.