ferrymanr said:
When my old system (P III with Windows 2000 pro) failed after several
years of good service I was given a refurbished AMD Duron based
motherboard. This runs much faster and my old Windows 2000 installed OK.
I run mostly public domain software and Open Office to keep the costs
down. However I am now finding that I am getting applications that only
run on XP.
Have you tried looking for Linux equivalents of the softare you're looking
for on XP? Linux is Free Software, and Free Software is better than public
domain because unlike public domain software, Free Software can't be
reclaimed by another entity down the line and taken out of the public
domain. Most software available for Linux is Free Software, so you're
pretty well covered once you make the switch.
Because of the way I network to other machines I am advised that I should
upgrade to Windows XP professional.
If you expand on this, there may be more than one way to acheive the same
goal that doesn't involve chunking down money on more software or resorting
to piracy.
Now this is where Microsoft just prices me and many others out of the
market. As a pensioner I receive a pension which, after paying rent and
bills leaves just enough for minor essentials like food. To purchase a
standard copy of XP Professional would take about a year of saving by
which time the price will have increased anyway.
If you're on such a tight budget, it would definitely be prudent to consider
some of the zero-cost alternatives to Windows. Windows is for those who
have the time and money to blow on expensive software and keeping an OS
with no public review secure, which is neither cheap nor trivial (if even
possible).
Even the educational version costs as much as I spend on food in a month.
And you can't legally license it unless you're a student or teacher.
Now this is in England. So how do low income earners, particularly in 3rd
world countries, manage to use modern software.
Ubuntu is Africa's most popular operating system. It's a Linux distribution
based around Debian Linux (I primarily use Debian myself). Much of
Extremadura in Spain uses Debian. Public schools in Oregon and Microsoft's
Washington home commonly use K12LTSP, a Linux distribution tuned to run a
large cluster of older machines used as terminals to one really overpowered
Linux server. The common theme in all these situations is that Microsoft
does not want their business: Microsoft can't squeeze money from the
economic rock that is Extremadura and Africa, and K12LTSP wouldn't even
exist had Microsoft not sued the Multnomah County, Oregon Educational
Service District over a bungled license audit, causing the County to drop
Microsoft products like a bad habit almost overnight.
Although I realise that the cost of software development and support is
high it amazes me that, for example, corporate users who earn money by the
software, can get massive bulk discounts on multi user licences whereas
Joe Public, and particularly low income earners, should have to pay full
price for what is a hobby and a lifeline to the outside world.
My colleagues in France have a saying about software. Translated to
English, its "You can get a worse product, but you have to pay more." To a
very large degree in the desktop and SOHO software world, the more you
spend on software, the more that software will suck.