Help Your Mom with networking, please

G

Guest

When I ran the first code you sent me on Cmputer B, the last line on Notepad
was "End diagnosis Mullaly 2". But when I ran the revised code, I got the
Can't find Mullaly 1" as posted here
 
G

Guest

Hi Chuck - here'e the results from the new code on Computer B:

CDiagnosis V1.3
Start diagnosis for MULLALY2
Full Targets MULLALY1 192.168.1.103 192.168.0.1 MULLALY2 192.168.1.101

Target MULLALY1

"ping MULLALY1"

Ping request could not find host MULLALY1. Please check the name and try
again.


"net view MULLALY1"


Target 192.168.1.103

"ping 192.168.1.103"



Pinging 192.168.1.103 with 32 bytes of data:



Request timed out.



Ping statistics for 192.168.1.103:

Packets: Sent = 1, Received = 0, Lost = 1 (100% loss),

I'm going to try you new post now...
 
G

Guest

Here's the results of using the Second Code you sent on Computer A:

CDiagnosis V1.3
Start diagnosis for MULLALY1
Full Targets MULLALY1 192.168.1.103 192.168.0.1 MULLALY2 192.168.1.101

Target MULLALY1

"ping MULLALY1"



Pinging MULLALY1 [192.168.1.103] with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128



Ping statistics for 192.168.1.103:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms


"net view MULLALY1"

Shared resources at MULLALY1

Wan's Computer

Share name Type Used as Comment

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORMS Disk
IMMIG_A- Disk
IMMIG_D- Disk
IMMIG_G- Disk
IMMIG_J- Disk
IMMIG_M- Disk
IMMIG_O- Disk
IMMIG_S- Disk
IMMIG_U- Disk
Printer Print Brother PCL5e Driver
SharedDocs Disk
The command completed successfully.


Target 192.168.1.103

"ping 192.168.1.103"



Pinging 192.168.1.103 with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128



Ping statistics for 192.168.1.103:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms


"net view 192.168.1.103"

Shared resources at 192.168.1.103

Wan's Computer

Share name Type Used as Comment

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORMS Disk
IMMIG_A- Disk
IMMIG_D- Disk
IMMIG_G- Disk
IMMIG_J- Disk
IMMIG_M- Disk
IMMIG_O- Disk
IMMIG_S- Disk
IMMIG_U- Disk
Printer Print Brother PCL5e Driver
SharedDocs Disk
The command completed successfully.


Target 192.168.0.1

"ping 192.168.0.1"



Pinging 192.168.0.1 with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128



Ping statistics for 192.168.0.1:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms


"net view 192.168.0.1"

Shared resources at 192.168.0.1

Wan's Computer

Share name Type Used as Comment

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORMS Disk
IMMIG_A- Disk
IMMIG_D- Disk
IMMIG_G- Disk
IMMIG_J- Disk
IMMIG_M- Disk
IMMIG_O- Disk
IMMIG_S- Disk
IMMIG_U- Disk
Printer Print Brother PCL5e Driver
SharedDocs Disk
The command completed successfully.


Target MULLALY2

"ping MULLALY2"



Pinging MULLALY2 [192.168.1.101] with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 192.168.1.101: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.101: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.101: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.101: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128



Ping statistics for 192.168.1.101:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 5ms


"net view MULLALY2"

Shared resources at MULLALY2

Denise

Share name Type Used as Comment

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HotDocs 5 Disk
IDS Disk
Printer Print Brother HL-5150D series
SharedDocs Disk
The command completed successfully.


Target 192.168.1.101

"ping 192.168.1.101"



Pinging 192.168.1.101 with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 192.168.1.101: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.101: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.101: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.101: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=128



Ping statistics for 192.168.1.101:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 5ms


"net view 192.168.1.101"

Shared resources at 192.168.1.101

Denise

Share name Type Used as Comment

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HotDocs 5 Disk
IDS Disk
Printer Print Brother HL-5150D series
SharedDocs Disk
The command completed successfully.


Ping Targets 127.0.0.1 192.168.1.1

Target 127.0.0.1

"ping 127.0.0.1"



Pinging 127.0.0.1 with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128



Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms


Target 192.168.1.1

"ping 192.168.1.1"



Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=150

Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=150

Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=150

Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=150



Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 3ms, Average = 2ms


End diagnosis for MULLALY1

As you can see, the thing ends with "end diagnosis" for this computer
 
C

Chuck

Hi Chuck - here'e the results from the new code on Computer B:

CDiagnosis V1.3
Start diagnosis for MULLALY2
Full Targets MULLALY1 192.168.1.103 192.168.0.1 MULLALY2 192.168.1.101

Target MULLALY1

"ping MULLALY1"

Ping request could not find host MULLALY1. Please check the name and try
again.


"net view MULLALY1"


Target 192.168.1.103

"ping 192.168.1.103"



Pinging 192.168.1.103 with 32 bytes of data:



Request timed out.



Ping statistics for 192.168.1.103:

Packets: Sent = 1, Received = 0, Lost = 1 (100% loss),

I'm going to try you new post now...

Paula,

So did you run this from the Command Window (Start - Run - "cmd")? If so, did
you note any error messages? Noting that it did run on Computer A, do you have
any idea why it would not run on Computer B? Any idea why what you posted from
Computer B the first time did not include the final line "End diagnosis..."
(especially as you noted, it did run to completion)?

--
Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck sonic net.
 
G

Guest

Hi Chuck - I ran the second code twice on computer B and each time I got this
message:
"System Error 53 has occurred.
The network path was not found."

For what it is worth (probably not much) I am having no trouble sharing
files, drives and printers between B and C, and A can use all of B and C's
resources. But neither B nor C can access A. (I know we're not concerned
with Computer C - just wanted you to know it is able to share just fine with
B and A) When I try to access A from either B or C, a message comes up that
says "Computer A is not available - check to make sure you typed the name
correctly" (or something like that). Or "the host computer cannot be found"
I made sure all three computers were up and running and I tried the codes
twice with the same results each time. In layman's terms, B and C are
broadcasting just fine but cannot receive. A is receiving just fine but
cannot broadcast. Sorry to babble on.....thanks, Paula
 
C

Chuck

Hi Chuck - I ran the second code twice on computer B and each time I got this
message:
"System Error 53 has occurred.
The network path was not found."

For what it is worth (probably not much) I am having no trouble sharing
files, drives and printers between B and C, and A can use all of B and C's
resources. But neither B nor C can access A. (I know we're not concerned
with Computer C - just wanted you to know it is able to share just fine with
B and A) When I try to access A from either B or C, a message comes up that
says "Computer A is not available - check to make sure you typed the name
correctly" (or something like that). Or "the host computer cannot be found"
I made sure all three computers were up and running and I tried the codes
twice with the same results each time. In layman's terms, B and C are
broadcasting just fine but cannot receive. A is receiving just fine but
cannot broadcast. Sorry to babble on.....thanks, Paula

Paula,

If MULLALY1 can access MULLALY2 and MULLALY3, but neither MULLALY2 nor MULLALY3
can access MULLALY1, I think we pretty much need to START with MULLALY1. Maybe
there are other problems too, but let's concentrate on MULLALY1 first.

Start by disabling the Broadcom Ethernet adapter, and we'll go from there.

If we can't get diagnostics from MULLALY2, maybe we can from MULLALY3 (or
whatever its name is). Start with extracting an IPConfig from there too.

--
Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck sonic net.
 
G

Guest

Hi Chuck - Right before I read your latest post, it occurred to me that
Mullaly 1 is the problem. If I try to access 1 from 3, I get this message:
"\\Mullaly 1 is not accessible. The computer or sharename could not be
found. Make sure you typed it correctly and try again" If I try to
access 1 from 2, I get thismessage: "\\Mullaly 1 is not accessible. You
might not have permission to use thisnetwork resource. Contact the
administrator of this server to find out if you have access permission. The
network path was not found."

Mullaly 1 is the "administrator computer" When you turn it on, you are
automatically logged into the computer as the administrator.

I just disabled the "Local Network"connection ( which is the ethernet one)

Mullaly 3 is running Windows 98. I don't know how to get the IP
configuration for Mullaly 3. Sorry - I TOLD you I was illierate. Thanks,
Paula
 
G

Guest

OK - here's the IP config for COmputer 3.

Host name Mullaly 3
DNS Servers 151.204.0.84
Node Type Broadcast
Instant Wireless USB Network Adapter
Adapter address 00-0C-41-0F-84-F5
IP Address 192.168.1.100
Subnet mask 255.255.255.0
default gateway 192.168.1.1
DHCP server 192.168.1.1

A stupid question: Is the fact that Computer 1 is the "network
administrator" computer meaningful? This is a new computer and I'm wondering
if there is something in the Network Administrator settings that maybe should
have been checked or not checked that is preventing 2 and 3 from accessing 1.
 
B

Buck Rogers

OK - here's the IP config for COmputer 3.

Host name Mullaly 3

<snip>

Just passing through...does the fact that the host names have spaces
in them have anything to do with it? In some OS's it matters.

Buck
 
C

Chuck

OK - here's the IP config for COmputer 3.

Host name Mullaly 3
DNS Servers 151.204.0.84
Node Type Broadcast
Instant Wireless USB Network Adapter
Adapter address 00-0C-41-0F-84-F5
IP Address 192.168.1.100
Subnet mask 255.255.255.0
default gateway 192.168.1.1
DHCP server 192.168.1.1

A stupid question: Is the fact that Computer 1 is the "network
administrator" computer meaningful? This is a new computer and I'm wondering
if there is something in the Network Administrator settings that maybe should
have been checked or not checked that is preventing 2 and 3 from accessing 1.

Paula,

OK, let's check M1 and M3 against each other - I would really like to know what
"Mullaly 1 is not accessible" means on your LAN.

According to the IPConfig, M1 has 2 network connections. The first is an
Ethernet connection, it looks like a big modular telephone connector. The
second is a USB wireless connector. A USB slot on the computer is a small
rectangular connection about 1/2" wide and 1/8" high.

Will you please look at M1, and verify that the Ethernet connector is empty, and
that the USB slot is connected to the Linksys USB Wifi device, as it is on M2
and M3. If there's a modem on M1, don't confuse its connector (an RJ-11) (which
is a standard modular telephone connector) with the Ethernet connector (an
RJ-45).

Next, let's check M1 and M3, as we tried to check M1 and M2 some time ago.
Please observe the difference in file names - on M1, you will save the code as
"cdiag.cmd"; on M3, "cdiag.bat".

Take the following again improved code (everything inside the "#####").

Open Notepad. Ensure that Format - Word Wrap is not checked. Highlight then
Copy the code (Ctrl-C), precisely as it is presented, and Paste (Ctrl-V) into
Notepad.
Save the Notepad file as "cdiag.cmd" (on M1) or as "cdiag.bat" (on M3), as type
"All Files", into the root folder "C:\".
Run it by Start - Run - "c:\cdiag".
Wait patiently.
When Notepad opens up displaying c:\cdiag.txt, first check Format and ensure
that Word Wrap is NOT checked! Then, copy the entire contents (Ctrl-A Ctrl-C)
and paste (Ctrl-V) into your next post.

See that the last line in each c:\cdiag.txt starts "End diagnosis...", and
please copy from the first thru the last line. All the information is
important.

Do this from all computers, please, with all computers powered up and online.

#####

@echo off
set FullTarget1=MULLALY1 192.168.1.103 192.168.0.1
set FullTarget2=MULLALY2 192.168.1.101
set FullTarget3=Mullaly3 192.168.1.100
set FullTarget4=
set FullTargets=%FullTarget1% %FullTarget2% %FullTarget3% %FullTarget4%
set FullTargets=%FullTargets% 127.0.0.1
set PingTargets=www.yahoo.com 66.94.230.32 192.168.1.1
Set Version=V1.31
@echo CDiagnosis %Version% >c:\cdiag.txt
@echo Start diagnosis for %computername% >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo Full Targets %FullTargets% >>c:\cdiag.txt
for %%a in (%FullTargets%) do (
@echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo "%computername% ping %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt
ping %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo "%computername% net view %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt
net view %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt
)
@echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo Ping Targets %PingTargets% >>c:\cdiag.txt
for %%a in (%PingTargets%) do (
@echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo "%computername% ping %%a" >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt
ping %%a >>c:\cdiag.txt
)
@echo. >>c:\cdiag.txt
@echo End diagnosis for %computername% >>c:\cdiag.txt
notepad c:\cdiag.txt
:EOF


--
Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck sonic net.
 
G

Guest

Chuck, I've been sitting here thinking about this stupid networking problem
and something occurred to me which may or may not have value. Again, keep in
mind my unfamiliarity with the technical workings of computers...

M1 is a new machine, about 1 month old. It was ordered from Dell. When it
arrived, we needed to transfer files from M2 to M1. I had a techie kid who
did the file transfers by hooking M1 and M2 up with a Belkin ethernet
adapter. He physically brought M2 close to M1 and did the transferring.

M2 had previously been our primary computer and had been hooked up to the
router and DSL modem. When it was moved to a back office and M1 became our
primary computer, M1 was hooked up to the router and modem. I don't know if
the kid reconfigured the router or needed to - but the internet continued to
work fine.

When I first looked at Network Connections on M2, the LAN connection said "a
device was unplugged". The device, of course, was the Belkin ethernet
adapter the kid used to transfer the files. I have formally "disabled" the
LAN on M2, and it is picking up M3 just fine over the wireless network. But
I'm wondering...how was the LAN enabled BEFORE the kid used the ethernet
adapter? On my home computer (also a Dell running Windows XP Home), which
has dial up internet, when I look at Network Connections, the LAN says it
uses a "WAN Network driver".

The LAN on M1 says it works off a Broadcom adapter. I don't know if it came
this way, or if this is the result of the router or what the kid did to
transfer the files. But if I disable this adapter, the internet won't work on
M1.

I just have a feeling that the LAN configuration is wrong on M1.

Doesn't the wireless network take the place of the LAN? Or do you need both
to share computers? I know the kid hooked up M1 the same way M2 was hooked
up to the router and modem, but we weren't trying to network the computers
when it was just M2 and M3, only sharing the internet.

As far as whether anything is plugged into the ethernet port on M1, I can
only repeat that there is a blue cable running from M1 into the router. The
modem has an "ethernet" light that is on and a "USB" light that is off. The
router is definitely hooked up to the modem via an ethernet cable.I do know
that the blue cable is plugged into a "fatter" port than a USB port, which is
kind of small. If we assume that the blue cable is an ethernet cable, should
I disconnect it? If I do, the computer would not be connected to the router.

I'm sorry to be so long winded. It bothers me when I can't understand
something and I have the feeling that someone like you could get this thing
done in a minute if you had hands on access.
 
G

Guest

PAULA said:
Chuck, I've been sitting here thinking about this stupid networking problem
and something occurred to me which may or may not have value. Again, keep in
mind my unfamiliarity with the technical workings of computers...

M1 is a new machine, about 1 month old. It was ordered from Dell. When it
arrived, we needed to transfer files from M2 to M1. I had a techie kid who
did the file transfers by hooking M1 and M2 up with a Belkin ethernet
adapter. He physically brought M2 close to M1 and did the transferring.

M2 had previously been our primary computer and had been hooked up to the
router and DSL modem. When it was moved to a back office and M1 became our
primary computer, M1 was hooked up to the router and modem. I don't know if
the kid reconfigured the router or needed to - but the internet continued to
work fine.

When I first looked at Network Connections on M2, the LAN connection said "a
device was unplugged". The device, of course, was the Belkin ethernet
adapter the kid used to transfer the files. I have formally "disabled" the
LAN on M2, and it is picking up M3 just fine over the wireless network. But
I'm wondering...how was the LAN enabled BEFORE the kid used the ethernet
adapter? On my home computer (also a Dell running Windows XP Home), which
has dial up internet, when I look at Network Connections, the LAN says it
uses a "WAN Network driver".

The LAN on M1 says it works off a Broadcom adapter. I don't know if it came
this way, or if this is the result of the router or what the kid did to
transfer the files. But if I disable this adapter, the internet won't work on
M1.

I just have a feeling that the LAN configuration is wrong on M1.

Doesn't the wireless network take the place of the LAN? Or do you need both
to share computers? I know the kid hooked up M1 the same way M2 was hooked
up to the router and modem, but we weren't trying to network the computers
when it was just M2 and M3, only sharing the internet.

As far as whether anything is plugged into the ethernet port on M1, I can
only repeat that there is a blue cable running from M1 into the router. The
modem has an "ethernet" light that is on and a "USB" light that is off. The
router is definitely hooked up to the modem via an ethernet cable.I do know
that the blue cable is plugged into a "fatter" port than a USB port, which is
kind of small. If we assume that the blue cable is an ethernet cable, should
I disconnect it? If I do, the computer would not be connected to the router.

I'm sorry to be so long winded. It bothers me when I can't understand
something and I have the feeling that someone like you could get this thing
done in a minute if you had hands on access.

I just did some research on M1. It has "integrated 10/100 ethernet" and the
blue cable is plugged into the serial port.
 
C

Chuck

Chuck, I've been sitting here thinking about this stupid networking problem
and something occurred to me which may or may not have value. Again, keep in
mind my unfamiliarity with the technical workings of computers...

M1 is a new machine, about 1 month old. It was ordered from Dell. When it
arrived, we needed to transfer files from M2 to M1. I had a techie kid who
did the file transfers by hooking M1 and M2 up with a Belkin ethernet
adapter. He physically brought M2 close to M1 and did the transferring.

M2 had previously been our primary computer and had been hooked up to the
router and DSL modem. When it was moved to a back office and M1 became our
primary computer, M1 was hooked up to the router and modem. I don't know if
the kid reconfigured the router or needed to - but the internet continued to
work fine.

When I first looked at Network Connections on M2, the LAN connection said "a
device was unplugged". The device, of course, was the Belkin ethernet
adapter the kid used to transfer the files. I have formally "disabled" the
LAN on M2, and it is picking up M3 just fine over the wireless network. But
I'm wondering...how was the LAN enabled BEFORE the kid used the ethernet
adapter? On my home computer (also a Dell running Windows XP Home), which
has dial up internet, when I look at Network Connections, the LAN says it
uses a "WAN Network driver".

The LAN on M1 says it works off a Broadcom adapter. I don't know if it came
this way, or if this is the result of the router or what the kid did to
transfer the files. But if I disable this adapter, the internet won't work on
M1.

I just have a feeling that the LAN configuration is wrong on M1.

Doesn't the wireless network take the place of the LAN? Or do you need both
to share computers? I know the kid hooked up M1 the same way M2 was hooked
up to the router and modem, but we weren't trying to network the computers
when it was just M2 and M3, only sharing the internet.

As far as whether anything is plugged into the ethernet port on M1, I can
only repeat that there is a blue cable running from M1 into the router. The
modem has an "ethernet" light that is on and a "USB" light that is off. The
router is definitely hooked up to the modem via an ethernet cable.I do know
that the blue cable is plugged into a "fatter" port than a USB port, which is
kind of small. If we assume that the blue cable is an ethernet cable, should
I disconnect it? If I do, the computer would not be connected to the router.

I'm sorry to be so long winded. It bothers me when I can't understand
something and I have the feeling that someone like you could get this thing
done in a minute if you had hands on access.

Paula,

A Local Area Network , or LAN, is a collection of computers connected thru a
network. You have a 4 component LAN:
Router 192.168.1.1
Mullaly1 192.168.1.103
Mullaly2 192.168.1.101
Mullaly3 192.168.1.100

When the techie kid hooked M1 and M2 up and transferred files, he created a
temporary LAN with 2 components:
Mullaly1 192.168.0.1
Mullaly2 192.168.0.?

If you can't get my diagnostic software to run successfully on your computers,
you need to run the ping commands by hand. I need you to ping Mullaly1,
Mullaly2, and the router, from both Mullaly1 and Mullaly2, and post the exact
and full content of the results from the 6 ping commands. From a command window
(Start - Run - "cmd"), enter 3 commands (less the ""), on both computers:
"ping Mullaly1"
"ping Mullaly2"
"ping 192.168.1.1"
and post the exact contents of the results.

Once I see the results, I'll know what to check next.

--
Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck sonic net.
 
C

Chuck

I just did some research on M1. It has "integrated 10/100 ethernet" and the
blue cable is plugged into the serial port.

Paula,

What is the other end of the blue cable plugged into?

--
Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck sonic net.
 
G

Guest

Hi Chuck - I finally "got" what you have been trying to tell me since Day 1
about the ethernet connection on Mullaly1. The blue cable has been
disconnected - it ran from the serial port of Mullaly1 to the router. Under
"network connection" on Mullaly1, the LAN icon is now redlined and says "A
cable is unpluged. So now the only network connection shown on both Mullaly
1 and 2 is the wireless connection. Nonetheless, when I try to access
Mullaly1 from Mullaly2 or Mullaly 3, I still get the "Mullaly1 is not
accessible" message

I am going to retry your diagnostic code again on Mullaly 1 and 2. Perhaps
with the LAN unplugged something will show up that makes sense to you. I'm
sorry that it took so long to do this. Thanks - PAULA
 
G

Guest

Chuck, here is the ping run on Mullaly1 using the code you sent me on Friday
March 17:

CDiagnosis V1.31
Start diagnosis for MULLALY1
Full Targets MULLALY1 192.168.1.103 192.168.0.1 MULLALY2 192.168.1.101
Mullaly3 192.168.1.100 127.0.0.1

"MULLALY1 ping MULLALY1"



Pinging MULLALY1 [::1] with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Reply from ::1: time<1ms

Reply from ::1: time<1ms



Ping statistics for ::1:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms


"MULLALY1 net view MULLALY1"

Shared resources at MULLALY1

Wan's Computer

Share name Type Used as Comment

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORMS Disk
HotDocs Disk
immig Disk
IMMIG_A- Disk
IMMIG_D- Disk
IMMIG_G- Disk
IMMIG_J- Disk
IMMIG_M- Disk
IMMIG_O- Disk
IMMIG_S- Disk
IMMIG_U- Disk
MBForms Disk
My Documents Disk
Printer Print Brother PCL5e Driver
SharedDocs Disk
The command completed successfully.


"MULLALY1 ping 192.168.1.103"



Pinging 192.168.1.103 with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128

Reply from 192.168.1.103: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128



Ping statistics for 192.168.1.103:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms


"MULLALY1 net view 192.168.1.103"

Shared resources at 192.168.1.103

Wan's Computer

Share name Type Used as Comment

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORMS Disk
HotDocs Disk
immig Disk
IMMIG_A- Disk
IMMIG_D- Disk
IMMIG_G- Disk
IMMIG_J- Disk
IMMIG_M- Disk
IMMIG_O- Disk
IMMIG_S- Disk
IMMIG_U- Disk
MBForms Disk
My Documents Disk
Printer Print Brother PCL5e Driver
SharedDocs Disk
The command completed successfully.


"MULLALY1 ping 192.168.0.1"



Pinging 192.168.0.1 with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 10.10.1.1: Destination net unreachable.

Reply from 10.10.1.1: Destination net unreachable.

Reply from 10.10.1.1: Destination net unreachable.

Reply from 10.10.1.1: Destination net unreachable.



Ping statistics for 192.168.0.1:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms


"MULLALY1 net view 192.168.0.1"
 
C

Chuck

Chuck, here is the ping run on Mullaly1 using the code you sent me on Friday
March 17:

Paula,

I need you to ping Mullaly1, Mullaly2, and the router, from both Mullaly1 and
Mullaly2, and post the exact and full content of the results from the 6 ping
commands. From a command window (Start - Run - "cmd"), enter 3 commands (less
the ""), on both computers:
"ping Mullaly1"
"ping Mullaly2"
"ping 192.168.1.1"
and post the exact contents of the results.

Once I see the results, I'll know what to check next.

--
Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck sonic net.
 
G

Guest

Some weirdness to report:

First, when I reach the command window (hopefully it's the black window with
the c prompt in it) and I type in ping mullaly 1 etc, it tells me it's a bad
command. I also tried entering it as c:\ping etc. When I did this, an error
screen popped up on Mullaly 3 (!) and that computer was shutting itself down
and acting badly until I shut it down for awhile. When I rebooted it it said
something about reconfiguring itself. (It works fine now)

When I couldn't run the "pings" as you posted them in your last post, I ran
the 3/17 code on M1...couldn't get to M2 today as we were trying to get work
out. Also, I don't know how to ping the router. *sigh*

Now that I've disconnected the ethernet LAN on M1, I'm wondering if I should
run the network setup wizard on M1 again and make a new network setup disk to
run on M2 and M3...does that make sense? Perhaps when M1 had 2 network
connections that affected the previous attempt to set up a network...Paula
 
C

Chuck

Some weirdness to report:

First, when I reach the command window (hopefully it's the black window with
the c prompt in it) and I type in ping mullaly 1 etc, it tells me it's a bad
command. I also tried entering it as c:\ping etc. When I did this, an error
screen popped up on Mullaly 3 (!) and that computer was shutting itself down
and acting badly until I shut it down for awhile. When I rebooted it it said
something about reconfiguring itself. (It works fine now)

When I couldn't run the "pings" as you posted them in your last post, I ran
the 3/17 code on M1...couldn't get to M2 today as we were trying to get work
out. Also, I don't know how to ping the router. *sigh*

Now that I've disconnected the ethernet LAN on M1, I'm wondering if I should
run the network setup wizard on M1 again and make a new network setup disk to
run on M2 and M3...does that make sense? Perhaps when M1 had 2 network
connections that affected the previous attempt to set up a network...Paula

Paula,

The router has ip address 192.168.1.1, so you type "ping 192.168.1.1", from both
computers.

Which computer did you get "bad command" on when pinging?

Please run all 3 pings ("Mullaly1", "Mulally2", and "192.168.1.1") from each
computer, and post the results here. Whichever one does NOT work on, post that
here too. Just please post everything at once in a nice complete list, so I can
figure out where you have to start.

--
Cheers,
Chuck
Paranoia comes from experience - and is not necessarily a bad thing.
My email is AT DOT
actual address pchuck sonic net.
 
G

Guest

OK (finally) here are the results of pinging M1, M2 and the router from each
of M1 and M2:

ON M2:

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\mullalytwo>ping 192.168.1.1
Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=150
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=150
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=150
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=150
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 6ms, Average = 3ms
C:\Documents and Settings\mullalytwo>ping mullaly1
Pinging mullaly1 [192.168.1.103] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.103:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
C:\Documents and Settings\mullalytwo>ping mullaly2
Pinging MULLALY2 [192.168.1.105] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.105: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.105: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.105: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.105: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.105:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

ON M1:

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Mullay&Mullaly>ping mullaly1
Pinging MULLALY1 [::1] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Reply from ::1: time<1ms
Ping statistics for ::1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Mullay&Mullaly>ping mullaly2
Pinging mullaly2 [192.168.1.105] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.105: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.105: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.105: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=128
Reply from 192.168.1.105: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.105:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 10ms, Average = 6ms
C:\Documents and Settings\Mullay&Mullaly>ping 192.168.1.1
Pinging 192.168.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=150
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=150
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=150
Reply from 192.168.1.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=150
Ping statistics for 192.168.1.1:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 4ms, Average = 3ms

Hope I did this right! Thanks, Paula
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top