External SATA RAID Boxes That Connect with eSATA?

J

Jon Forrest

I have a couple of Promise UltraTrak boxes that
are working great. These are boxes that use PATA
drives, contain a RAID controller, and connect to
a host using SCSI.

I'd like to upgrade these to something similar but
more modern, something with a RAID controller but
something that uses SATA disks, and attaches to
a host using a single eSATA cable. In other words,
the host sees a single large drive.

Are there any vendors that makes such things?

Cordially,
Jon Forrest
 
T

Timothy Daniels

So which box satisfies the OP's requirement for
1) just one eSATA cable connecting the box to the mobo,
and
2) the collection of HDs looking like one big HD?

*TimDaniels*
 
J

Jon Forrest

For what it's worth I did use Google. I found a fair number of
SATA multi-disk boxes that attach to a SATA RAID controller on
the host via multiple SATA cables. I didn't find a single example
of what I'm looking for, which is a multi-drive SATA box with an
internal RAID 5 controller, that attaches to a host using
a single SATA cable. In other words, something just like
the Promise UltraTrak series, except with PATA and SCSI replaced
with SATA.

Jon Forrest
 
M

Marco De Vitis

Jon Forrest ha scritto:
the host via multiple SATA cables. I didn't find a single example
of what I'm looking for, which is a multi-drive SATA box with an
internal RAID 5 controller, that attaches to a host using
a single SATA cable. In other words, something just like

I encountered this one, which AFAICT does not have an internal
controller but attaches to a host using a single cable (depending on the
chosen model):
http://www.addonics.com/products/raid_system/ast4.asp
 
F

Folkert Rienstra

Marco De Vitis said:
Jon Forrest ha scritto:


I encountered this one, which AFAICT does not have an internal
controller but attaches to a host using a single cable (depending on the
chosen model):
http://www.addonics.com/products/raid_system/ast4.asp

Some of these available from cooldrives too:
http://www.cooldrives.com/sata-raid1.html (look for: port multiplier)
(need a controller -RAID or not- that is compatible with port multipliers).
like so: http://www.cooldrives.com/sapciexracor.html (just an example)

They use this: http://www.cooldrives.com/cosapomubrso.html
You can probably even use it to convert the Promise SCSI boxen.
 
F

Folkert Rienstra

Jon Forrest said:
For what it's worth I did use Google. I found a fair number of
SATA multi-disk boxes that attach to a SATA RAID controller on
the host via multiple SATA cables. I didn't find a single example
of what I'm looking for, which is a multi-drive SATA box with an
internal RAID 5 controller, that attaches to a host using a single
SATA cable. In other words, something just like the Promise Ultra
Trak series, except with PATA and SCSI replaced with SATA.

Like this: http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/ide-sata-sub.htm ?
Only SATA-I though, that's less bandwidth than the Promise UltraTrak
 
F

Folkert Rienstra

Jon Forrest said:
I have a couple of Promise UltraTrak boxes that are working great.
These are boxes that use PATA drives, contain a RAID controller,
and connect to a host using SCSI.

I'd like to upgrade these to something similar but
more modern,

They are still very up-to-date, unless the internal RAID controller is poor.
Ultra133 and Ultra160 will do fine today, especially with parity RAID
levels.
something with a RAID controller but something that uses SATA disks,
and attaches to a host using a single eSATA cable.

A multilane cable is still a single cable too and it isn't bandwidth limited
to 3Gb/s (or even 1.5Gb/s).
 
J

Jon Forrest

Timothy said:
It's interesting to see what some people will pay for what amounts
to a box, PSU, and a RAID card.

It's also interesting to see what people will pay for what
amounts to a box, a motherboard, CPU, memory, and a disk drive.

Jon
 
T

Timothy Daniels

Jon Forrest said:
It's also interesting to see what people will pay for what
amounts to a box, a motherboard, CPU, memory, and a disk drive.


It's more interesting to see how low the prices for large hard drives
have gotten. Just two hard drives can get you a terabyte of storage
inside the PC.

*TimDaniels*
 
F

Folkert Rienstra

Jon Forrest said:
Almost, but not quite. Neither of these do RAID 5.

Which is why I answered to Timmy.
Raid5 wasn't mentioned yet in your original post.
 
F

Folkert Rienstra

Timothy Daniels said:
It's more interesting to see how low the prices for large hard drives
have gotten. Just two hard drives can get you a terabyte of storage
inside the PC.

So what are PC towers used for then, Timmy?
And add-in disk controllers?

One uses external storage for other reasons.
 
F

Folkert Rienstra

Jon Forrest said:
Port multipliers would probably work but they seem like a bandaid

Not necessarily. RAID is more and more a software affair.
Port multipliers help in achieving arrays on a distance using software
RAID on the host with a minimum of ports and (hopefully) reduced cost.

Sure, if you want host independence it may be easier to have the raid
function in the external cabinet itself. But then how really host inde-
pendent can you be.
(Of course it would help if there was a universal disk file system and a
normalized RAID metadata standard to make it really host independent).
approach that will disappear once somebody comes out with what I'm
looking for.

Port multipliers are mainly used to reduce cable clutter in systems that
use huge amounts of storage in JBOD fashion (do not need huge amounts
of bandwidth for a single transfer, like striped arrays do).
Striped arrays (of more than 2 drives) are probably better served with
multiple ports and multilane cables. Either that or go serial SCSI (SAS).
Though SAS is actually also multilane in itself (dual port) the two ports
can be combined to deliver 6Gb/s.
 
J

Jon Forrest

Folkert said:
Not necessarily. RAID is more and more a software affair.
Port multipliers help in achieving arrays on a distance using software
RAID on the host with a minimum of ports and (hopefully) reduced cost.

Sure, if you want host independence it may be easier to have the raid
function in the external cabinet itself. But then how really host inde-
pendent can you be.

Right. My goal is to have a RAID-5 boxes that I can
move from server to server, if necessary. I like
to mirror RAID boxes using Robocopy at night so that
if one box breaks, I can easily and quickly replace
it with a fairly uptodate replacement.

Jon
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top