G
Guest
If I copy or stream audio (wav) files on to a newly formatted non-system NTFS
HD, even streaming 44k1/16bit stereo in real time (which gives the drive
controller masses of time to decide how to write consecutive blocks, because
the drive is not reading or writing anything else at the time), Windows
defrag reports the entire drive contents as being fragmented and advises a
defrag.
But surely, the data has just been written to the platters in a manner which
requires the least head movement and sector jumping, so that any messing with
the sequence by defragmenting will actually make playback less efficient...??
I asked this question at Experts Exchange, but the answer given (multiple
heads writing to multiple platters) doesn't make any difference to the
principle I'm arguing. I'm sure I've got it wrong, but I'd like to
understand WHY my assumption is not correct...
HD, even streaming 44k1/16bit stereo in real time (which gives the drive
controller masses of time to decide how to write consecutive blocks, because
the drive is not reading or writing anything else at the time), Windows
defrag reports the entire drive contents as being fragmented and advises a
defrag.
But surely, the data has just been written to the platters in a manner which
requires the least head movement and sector jumping, so that any messing with
the sequence by defragmenting will actually make playback less efficient...??
I asked this question at Experts Exchange, but the answer given (multiple
heads writing to multiple platters) doesn't make any difference to the
principle I'm arguing. I'm sure I've got it wrong, but I'd like to
understand WHY my assumption is not correct...