Cheap Enclosure for 4 IDE drives?

J

J. Clarke

Actually, I do - And am unwilling to invest the time configuring
functionality I don't need.

Which.
is.
the.
point.

So instead you'll waste a lot more time configuring some kind of kluged up
contraption.

I'm sorry, but if you see configuring a server as being a more complex to
time consuming task than kluging up some kind of USB-based monstrosity then
you really do NOT know how to configure a server, no matter what you
_believe_ to be the case.
 
D

d0kt0r_$73v3

Then the USB route is a ****ed approach for that.
So can a 250G drive.

A single 250GB drive lacks the resiliency of a 80GBxN raid5 set. A raid5 set
can tolerate an inevitable drive failure - A single 250GB drive can't.


--
..............................................................................

"No nation keeps another in subjection without herself turning into a
subject nation."
-Mahatma Gandhi

..............................................................................
(e-mail address removed) http://www.memeticcandiru.com
 
H

hym3n_h0l0c4$t


Duh yourself. The 250 drive was your own crappy suggestion.


--
..............................................................................

"I have no doubt that [Palestinian] civilians deserve punishment"

-Menachim Begin, 1982.

..............................................................................
(e-mail address removed) http://www.memeticcandiru.com
 
R

Rod Speed

Duh yourself. The 250 drive was your own crappy suggestion.

Even someone as stupid as you should be able to work out from the
thread that if he does want raid5, the collosal kludge of attempting it
with individual USB bridges per drive is a completely silly way to do that.

And you dont need raid5 in a BACKUP POOL anyway.

Now get back in your cage.
 
H

h1dd3n_h4m$73r

In calgary.general Rod Speed said:
Even someone as stupid as you should be able to work out from the
thread that if he does want raid5, the collosal kludge of attempting it
with individual USB bridges per drive is a completely silly way to do that.

Not at all, given "his" constraints.
And you dont need raid5 in a BACKUP POOL anyway.

That's a judgement call, based on the value of the data.




--
..............................................................................

Just think of the tragedy of teaching children not to doubt.

..............................................................................
(e-mail address removed) http://www.memeticcandiru.com
 
J

J. Clarke

Not at all, given "his" constraints.


That's a judgement call, based on the value of the data.

Actually, unless one needs to span two drives to get space for a single
backup, for backup you're better off having multiple independent backup
drives and removing them when not in use, so that you're using them in the
same general way that tapes are used. Having an array online for backup
makes it difficult to maintain isolated generations--something that kills
one backup may kill them all.
 
7

7h3_n3ck_r0m4nc3r

In calgary.general J. Clarke said:
Actually, unless one needs to span two drives to get space for a single
backup, for backup you're better off having multiple independent backup
drives and removing them when not in use, so that you're using them in the
same general way that tapes are used. Having an array online for backup
makes it difficult to maintain isolated generations--something that kills
one backup may kill them all.

Very valid point.

--
..............................................................................

"If you can't change the world Change yourself"
-Matt Johnson

..............................................................................
(e-mail address removed) http://www.memeticcandiru.com
 
R

Rod Speed

Not at all, given "his" constraints.

Thanks for that completely superfluous
proof that you've never ever had a ****ing clue.

'his constraints' are completely stupid.
That's a judgement call, based on the value of the data.

Nope. That pool is ALREADY A BACKUP, stupid.
 
M

m3nn0_s4r

Nope. That pool is ALREADY A BACKUP, stupid.

That's obvious.

You're a nasty one, arncha?


--
..............................................................................

"In June 1967, we again had a choice: The Egyptian Army concentrations in
the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack
us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him"

-Menachem Begin

..............................................................................
(e-mail address removed) http://www.memeticcandiru.com
 
B

_B

I've got 4 80GB Drives that I'd like to redeploy in my house, but my
existing computers don't have any free IDE connexions, PCI slots, or drive
bays. I also don't want to create another complete PC in my house.

I've seen some IDE-raid enclosures, but they are all prohibitively expensive.

I've seen IDE->USB adapters cheap on Ebay (~$12 each). I'm thinking I could
grab 4 of these, connect my drives to a hub, and place them all in a small
PC tower, and connect the hub to one of my computers. It wouldn't be
pretty, but it would be fairly inexpensive.

Given the capacity of the drives and the cheapness of new 300GB drives
($130 or so when you find a deal, even for new Seagates), you may end
up paying more than it's worth for the USB adaptors or enclosures. On
the other hand, you could use those for mostly-offline stuff. In that
case, you could hand-unplug instead of trying a hub (a bottleneck, as
someone mentioned). They may not have that much runtime left anyway.
I know my Maxtors, vintage 2-3 years are croaking en masse.

Also, RAID 0 won't make anything more reliable. You could RAID-5 the
whole bunch of them. USB 2.0 won't keep up with the speed, but at
least you'd have one large volume and you'd be able to tolerate one
drive failure at a time.

Having said all of that, I think Lacie may make some kind of Raid'd
USB enclosure. They had an external 500GB box, and I don't know how
else you'd get there.

There's also a server-type box made by Buffalo. Way beyond the call
for this type of thing, but it's a network connect, so it should be
speedy.

Interesting comments by others in this thread who recommend using an
old PC as a pseudo-network-server. I was actually considering doing
this with some old 120GBs and a couple retired 3Ware Raid controllers.
You could probably get 6000-series 3Ware controllers on Ebay for cheap
and hook them up as Raid 5. That is, if you have an extra computer
and/or if you're already running a network.
 
B

_B

I already have several higher-capacity drives. I'm looking to create a
poor man's JBOD, and raid-5 it. 80GB extra is useless to me... but 240GB
or more can be used as a backup pool. As 80GB drives get cheaper and
cheaper, it will be pennies to extend my existing raid 5 set.

Run the cable out to the garage so it doesn't make too much noise <g>
 
L

l3gl3$$_m4r1n3

So it aint a judgement call, stupid.
I just dump on terminal ****wits like you.

Whatever makes you feel better...



--
..............................................................................

"Once something is seen, it cannot be made to be unseen."

-Bertoldt Brecht

..............................................................................
(e-mail address removed) http://www.memeticcandiru.com
 
C

cuddles

Its what makes terminal ****wits like you feel worse, actually.

Aspiring to make others feel worse isn't a healthy way to live life.



--
..............................................................................

Tell people something they know already and they will thank you for it. Tell
them something new and they will hate you for it.

-George Monbiot

..............................................................................
(e-mail address removed) http://www.memeticcandiru.com
 
D

Dice

Aspiring to make others feel worse isn't a healthy way to live life.

I don't know why you are bothering Dan, Rod obviously doesn't know his
ass from page eight, and is nothing more than a argumentative twit. He
is just like Jon Pike, better to just ignore him, completely.
 
L

l3gl3$$_m4r1n3

In calgary.general Dice said:
I don't know why you are bothering Dan, Rod obviously doesn't know his
ass from page eight, and is nothing more than a argumentative twit. He
is just like Jon Pike, better to just ignore him, completely.

Dice... I just clued into who you are. Didn't know you were still around.

BTW, I'd love to get together for a pint before the summer's out.


--
..............................................................................

Even if you do learn to speak correct English, whom are you going
to speak it to?
- Clarence Darrow

..............................................................................
(e-mail address removed) http://www.memeticcandiru.com
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top