Babya Software Group acquires CCAntivirus

[Richard Steinfeld]

In a press release released today, AA Fussy of the Babya Software
Group released to the press that the acquisition of Roger
Johannson had been completed.

"We actually have not consummated the deal," Fussy said, "but our
terms are so unbeatable that there is no way that Roger won't
accept. Roger is a dear personal friend of mine. We are so close
with each other that I just went ahaid and did it."

According to Fussy, the acquisition is a done deal. Johannson was
not available for comment. Fussy added, "Babya is happy once
again to add Johannson to our ever-growing stable of offerings.
Johannson will be given a prominent stall, close to the hay."

 

[Ugly to the max]

In a press release released today, AA Fussy of the Babya Software
Group released to the press that the acquisition of Roger
Johannson had been completed.

"We actually have not consummated the deal," Fussy said, "but our
terms are so unbeatable that there is no way that Roger won't
accept. Roger is a dear personal friend of mine. We are so close
with each other that I just went ahaid and did it."

According to Fussy, the acquisition is a done deal. Johannson was
not available for comment. Fussy added, "Babya is happy once
again to add Johannson to our ever-growing stable of offerings.
Johannson will be given a prominent stall, close to the hay."

Personally, without hesitation or deviation from presumptions of what goeth
before a fall (whatever the heck that meant), I find some of these posts
hilarious, guffaw inducing, even, and find them to be a delightful diversion
from the explicit sameness encountered with the vast majority of postings
perused.

Wheeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!

I respectfully remain,

Uglier than thee

______________________________________________
Cyrix DX-2 33 mhz
500 mb HD 4 Mb RAM
Win 3.1 / DOS 5

 

[Grego..]

Why did you ever bother to put the w3c compliance picture on your site? Even
if it were compliant (which its not) it is just a mess. sorry but it is. Who
cares about compliant if it wraps all over the screen with broken link and
looks so untidy and amature. I think w3c might sue you?

 

[Christopher Jahn]

Why did you ever bother to put the w3c compliance picture
on your site? Even if it were compliant (which its not) it
is just a mess

Actually, it IS compliant - until NETSCAPE/AOL inserts it in
their homepage site. I ran it through the W3C's own validator
before I uploaded it to Netscape.

Try my new website - it validates.

--
Christopher Jahn
:-(

http://home.comcast.net/~xjahn/Main.html

A sucking chest wound is just nature's way of telling you to
slow down.