J
Jordan
"Since you get your systems from a local vendor If they assemble them you
could request they place the sticker inside the case."
Oh Yeah! Read Section 8 of the OEM System Builders License.
============================
http://oem.microsoft.com/downloads/sbLicense2004/English_SB_License.pdf
8. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY (COA) LABEL/PROOF OF LICENSE (POL) LABEL. If
the individual software license includes a COA or combination COA/POL label,
the system builder who installs the individual software license must attach
the COA or combination COA/POL label, as applicable, to the outside of the
fully assembled computer system case in an easily accessible location.
============================
Notice how it says OUTSIDE and in an EASILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. Now maybe
you should finally admit that you were wrong for making stupid comments
about me not knowing what I am talking about now that it has been made clear
in B&W that you don't know the first thing about what you are talking about.
As for integrating the SP into the original install what don't you
understand????? I am still in the same boat because no matter what version
I patch to be up to the latest, that unpatched version to start must be the
same as the installed version on the computer getting the inplace upgrade.
That can be one of 4 versions of the hundred CDs that I have now.
Also, the hardware, etc have NOTHING to do with the OEM CD that ships from
MS. You can use any standard OEM cd no matter what the service pack to do a
"fresh" install and at no time will the hardware cause any invalid key error
so again you don't know what you are talking about.
You only get a error on hardware if you use a "Recovery CD" configured by
Dell, Sony, etc. The Recovery CD will check the hardware match prior to
installing because this is a copy of the shipped image. It is not an
install.
It wasn't this way in NT 4 or in Windows 2000. I could use a 2000 SPx
install to reinstall a system that shipped with any previous service pack
without a problem and this
could request they place the sticker inside the case."
Oh Yeah! Read Section 8 of the OEM System Builders License.
============================
http://oem.microsoft.com/downloads/sbLicense2004/English_SB_License.pdf
8. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY (COA) LABEL/PROOF OF LICENSE (POL) LABEL. If
the individual software license includes a COA or combination COA/POL label,
the system builder who installs the individual software license must attach
the COA or combination COA/POL label, as applicable, to the outside of the
fully assembled computer system case in an easily accessible location.
============================
Notice how it says OUTSIDE and in an EASILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. Now maybe
you should finally admit that you were wrong for making stupid comments
about me not knowing what I am talking about now that it has been made clear
in B&W that you don't know the first thing about what you are talking about.
As for integrating the SP into the original install what don't you
understand????? I am still in the same boat because no matter what version
I patch to be up to the latest, that unpatched version to start must be the
same as the installed version on the computer getting the inplace upgrade.
That can be one of 4 versions of the hundred CDs that I have now.
Also, the hardware, etc have NOTHING to do with the OEM CD that ships from
MS. You can use any standard OEM cd no matter what the service pack to do a
"fresh" install and at no time will the hardware cause any invalid key error
so again you don't know what you are talking about.
You only get a error on hardware if you use a "Recovery CD" configured by
Dell, Sony, etc. The Recovery CD will check the hardware match prior to
installing because this is a copy of the shipped image. It is not an
install.
It wasn't this way in NT 4 or in Windows 2000. I could use a 2000 SPx
install to reinstall a system that shipped with any previous service pack
without a problem and this