A DEFINITION OF FREEWARE

T

Thorsten Duhn

Another sympathizer of Muslim terrorists reveals himself:

everyone who's not your opinion and dislikes your off-topic
spamming is a Muslim terrorist? Stupid!
 
T

Thorsten Duhn

Thorsten said:
everyone who's not your opinion and dislikes your off-topic
spamming is a Muslim terrorist? Stupid!

BTW, before you promote something wrong: I'm a catholic.

And my political standing is not described with a simple label.
 
G

Guest

message | > There's much more to our dear "Dr." than simply sponsoring religious
| > intolerance and hatred. He sows them (viz. soc.indian.culture and his
| > eponymous ng: alt.fan.jai-maharaj).
| > . . .
|

That's me !
The fake doctor Jay Stevens (aka Jai Maharaji) the shitskin hindu coolie.
 
J

John Jay Smith

BTW, before you promote something wrong: I'm a catholic.
And my political standing is not described with a simple label.

And I am human. I am the Universal Human.

My home is earth, no specific region. My beliefs are the core that exists in
every religion and
surprisingly does not conflict with science. My political standing is based
on love.

But anyone could become a universal human, they just don't know it.

Science through genetics (study of Y chromosome mutations) has proved that
40.000 years ago, all man had the same forefather.
The scientists call him "scientific Adam". He probably originated somewhere
in Africa near Tasmania.

This means we are all cousins and related to each other. All men of every
color and shape had the same descendant.
I do not understand why we fight or have wars.
I believe in peace and unity, and to use you mind to overcome problems in a
creative way. Not quarrel.
I believe in abundance.
The solution is to let go of the limitations we ourselves place upon us, or
was placed upon us by others before us.

When people are told that global peace is obtainable, they see it as some
idealistic fantasy, child talk, then they suggest the speaker to return to
reality.
But hate is only one reality others has chosen for us, and we continue to
follow. We can chose to do things differently. Its all a matter of choice.

Humans have tremendous potential, and are capable of living in peace and
harmony with themselves, others and the universe.
 
B

beenthere

John Jay Smith said:
And I am human. I am the Universal Human.

My home is earth, no specific region. My beliefs are the core that exists
in every religion and
surprisingly does not conflict with science. My political standing is
based on love.

But anyone could become a universal human, they just don't know it.

Science through genetics (study of Y chromosome mutations) has proved that
40.000 years ago, all man had the same forefather.
The scientists call him "scientific Adam". He probably originated
somewhere in Africa near Tasmania.

This means we are all cousins and related to each other. All men of every
color and shape had the same descendant.
I do not understand why we fight or have wars.
I believe in peace and unity, and to use you mind to overcome problems in
a creative way. Not quarrel.
I believe in abundance.
The solution is to let go of the limitations we ourselves place upon us,
or was placed upon us by others before us.

When people are told that global peace is obtainable, they see it as some
idealistic fantasy, child talk, then they suggest the speaker to return to
reality.
But hate is only one reality others has chosen for us, and we continue to
follow. We can chose to do things differently. Its all a matter of choice.

Humans have tremendous potential, and are capable of living in peace and
harmony with themselves, others and the universe.
Snipped.

That deserves a score of 10 out of 10.

Sadly convincing some, is gonna be a problem.

Mankind has either got to get it right, or there won`t be any Mankind.
 
D

Daniel Mandic

beenthere said:
Mankind has either got to get it right, or there won`t be any Mankind.



Right (biologically) is already dominant. Why more?



Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
D

Dr. Jai Maharaj

BTW, before you promote something wrong: I'm a catholic.

Why is the Christian church infested with sex criminals?
Here's one of hundreds of recent news reports on the subject:

Vatican loses bid for immunity in Oregon clergy abuse lawsuit

By Jaime Jansen
JURIST
Thursday, June 8, 2006

A federal judge in Oregon allowed a sexual abuse
lawsuit against the Catholic Church to move forward
Wednesday, rejecting the Vatican's bid to dismiss the
suit for lack of jurisdiction. The ruling allows a
Seattle-area man to continue with his claim [complaint,
PDF] that the Holy See [official website] is liable for
transferring the Rev. Andrew Ronan from Ireland to
Chicago to Portland, even though the church knew Ronan
had a history of sexual abuse. The lawsuit, filed in 2002
[AP report] in the US District Court for the District of
Oregon [official website], alleges the Vatican, the
Archdiocese of Portland and the archbishop of Chicago
conspired to protect Ronan by transferring him from city
to city. District Judge Michael Mosman [official profile]
ruled that Ronan was an employee of the Vatican under
Oregon law and noted that there are exceptions to the
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act [text], which typically
grants the Vatican and other foreign states immunity in
US courts. The 1976 act does not shield states when
engaged in commercial or certain harmful activities in
the United States. The judge added that the Holy See
offered no evidence contradicting its involvement in
transferring Ronan to protect him.

No one has successfully sued the Vatican over allegations
of sexual abuse by priests [JURIST news archive],
although individual dioceses have been sued and agreed to
large settlements [JURIST report]. Last year, a US
district judge in Kentucky ruled [JURIST report] that the
Holy See is a foreign state subject to immunity
protections under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act,
rejecting the plaintiff's argument that the Vatican is an
international religious organization. A federal judge in
Texas later ruled that Pope Benedict XVI [official
profile] enjoys immunity as the head of the Vatican
[JURIST report], dismissing a civil suit alleging that
the pontiff conspired to conceal clergy sex abuse. AP has
more.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060608/D8I3O6D00.html

More at:
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/06/vatican-loses-bid-for-immunity-in.php

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
 
T

Thorsten Duhn

BTW, before you promote something wrong: I'm a catholic.
Why is the Christian church infested with sex criminals?

shut up stupid. There are mislead anywhere on earth, and there
are also good and honest people anywhere, even in any religion.
It's obvious, your among the mislead.

Just stay away from where you don't belong, this newsgroup is
for a specific kind of software products, freeware. It's not
about any extremistic opinions and isms.

(The times before I removed the crosspost flame, this time I'll
have to include all as you affronted me personally in all these
groups.)


EOT: does not make sense to talk to mindless radicals
 
D

Dr. Jai Maharaj

In alt.comp.freeware, in article <[email protected]>,
shut up stupid. . . .
- Thorsten Duhn <[email protected]>

Here's another one of 100s of recent news reports about sex crimes
by Christian priests:

Vatican defrocks Springfield Diocese priest accused of sex abuse

The Associated Press
WHDH
Thursday, June 8, 2006

Springfield, MA (AP) - A Roman Catholic priest suspected
of sexual abuse while serving in the Springfield Diocese
has been defrocked, church officials said Thursday.

Richard Meehan, a one-time director of vocations for the
diocese who was responsible for recruiting and overseeing
seminarians, was permanently dismissed from the
priesthood on April 28 by Pope Benedict XVI.

"This demonstrates a resolve on part of the Vatican and
the church as a whole to deal with the issue of sexual
abuse," said Mark Dupont, a spokesman for the Springfield
Diocese. "For a priest to be removed from the priesthood
is the most severe punishment."

Dupont would not give any details of the accusations
against Meehan or say how many people he is suspected of
abusing.

John Stobierski, a Greenfield lawyer who represents two
men who say they were molested by Meehan when they were
boys, said the abuse occurred between 1969 and 1984.

"There is a wide span of time within which he was
allegedly out there abusing children," said Stobierski,
who in 2004 helped negotiate a $7.7 million settlement
between the diocese and 46 victims of clergy sexual
abuse.

Meehan, who last served as a parish priest at St. John
the Evangelist in Agawam, could not immediately be
reached for comment.

More at:
http://www1.whdh.com/news/articles/local/BO20739/

Jai Maharaj
http://tinyurl.com/a5ljc
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
 
H

Helen

Craig said:
Listen, Stud-muffin;

LOL! The second time I've heard that term, but in both
instances I'd say a more apropos description is vice-versa,
that's what they are. LOL!
 
T

The Chief Instigator

everyone who's not your opinion and dislikes your off-topic
spamming is a Muslim terrorist? Stupid!

You're dealing with Jay "Dr. Jai Maharaj" Stevens of Hawai'i, who is a
flagrant spammer and scammer. He's best filtered out.
 
J

John Jay Smith

Humanity is at a crucial point. While he managed to survive and evolve, and
multiply, now he is against
a different kind of problem. While problems used to solved by flee or fight,
now there is no new territory on this planet for people to flee to, and wars
can escalate and wipe out all life on this planet.
Also due to overpopulation and bad use of technology and resources we are
destroying the planet. It is stable still, after 100-200 years of abuse, but
we cannot go on doing the same things, if we want to survive.

Petroleum will finish. We will have to find a new clean and abundant energy
to replace it...
I personally know that this already exists. However, people with greed and
the need to control
the masses, do not want humanity to have it.

So either we learn to stop fighting, and evolve our technology to be clean
and in harmony with the earth,
or we and the planet will perish. Humans are dominant over all animals, but
also have the power to destroy a
whole planet on purpose (using weapons) or because of bad use of technology
(global warming & pollution).

One could say that man could go to another planet and live. Well sorry, we
just don't have the technology
for that yet. And we would have destroyed a paradise (earth) to live on mars
for example? That's worse that the worse desert on earth. Very little water,
no suitable atmosphere, giant storms etc. I find that proposition
tremendously stupid.

My solution: Man must be awaken mentally first. He must understand and be
aware of new concepts.
This new way of thinking will produce more peace and new technologies that
will solve most of the problems
we have today. It can be done, and I think we already have to tool to do it.

The tool is a new free global network of information transfer, called the
INTERNET. This will make people see that we are all one.
This will help educate the people. This will help spring up new ideas for
new technologies, or help
uncover the already existing ones that are being suppressed.
 
M

Midjis

Here's another one of 100s of recent news reports about sex crimes
by Christian priests:

Jai - sorry, 'Doctor' - for someone who has his own fan newsgroup, you
don't seem to have much to say for yourself on this one. Any thoughts that
aren't simply ripped from the news wire?
 
D

Daniel Mandic

John said:
Humanity is at a crucial point. While he managed to survive and
evolve, and multiply, now he is against a different kind of problem.
While problems used to solved by flee or fight, now there is no new
territory on this planet for people to flee to, and wars can escalate
and wipe out all life on this planet. Also due to overpopulation and
bad use of technology and resources we are destroying the planet. It
is stable still, after 100-200 years of abuse, but we cannot go on
doing the same things, if we want to survive.

It's not so tight, yet.

We must be just aware of the time of changing, that the destroyers
don't collect the laurels, saying everything is O.K. now, as it was
ever before :)
Petroleum will finish. We will have to find a new clean and abundant
energy to replace it... I personally know that this already exists.
However, people with greed and the need to control the masses, do not
want humanity to have it.

There is Oil for the next hundred of years, but we will be suffocated
before we can expense all of the resourses :-|
So either we learn to stop fighting, and evolve our technology to be
clean and in harmony with the earth, or we and the planet will
perish. Humans are dominant over all animals, but also have the power
to destroy a whole planet on purpose (using weapons) or because of
bad use of technology (global warming & pollution).

There is enough clean tech available. Solar cells will not help us to
compensate the energy-needings of climatic-indulged etc.. people.
That's one of the only good decisions of the American President, he
halved the budget for solar-tech development when he started his
presidential office, leaving one halve free for Space Exploring (The
only useful need of solar cells, IMHO).
One could say that man could go to another planet and live. Well
sorry, we just don't have the technology for that yet. And we would
have destroyed a paradise (earth) to live on mars for example? That's
worse that the worse desert on earth. Very little water, no suitable
atmosphere, giant storms etc. I find that proposition tremendously
stupid.

Well, think about a Mars full of green, with water, 21% oxygen
(standard) Air, nice temparature (+30 degrees C, sunny, uncloudy -
Midday)... almost PERFECT. BUT, go out for swimming, you will not see
the next day. Can you imagine why? There is no Monster in the lake! :)
My solution: Man must be awaken mentally first. He must understand
and be aware of new concepts. This new way of thinking will produce
more peace and new technologies that will solve most of the problems
we have today. It can be done, and I think we already have to tool to
do it.

The tool is a new free global network of information transfer, called
the INTERNET. This will make people see that we are all one. This
will help educate the people. This will help spring up new ideas for
new technologies, or help uncover the already existing ones that are
being suppressed.

Hmmm, there are enugh tech, it had been just being used :-|

(e.g. Germany, France and some other in Europe, with 'PAL' and 'PAL+
16:9'.... you could/can watch the WM with an old '1970 B/W TV-Set' with
two 16:9-Beams ;-) ...
Plasma is not so bad but a standard CRT makes even deeper pictures and
needs a lesser current consumption AND keeps much longer alive without
so drastic burn-in troubles and/or heating, what is possibly the
problem to the short life-span)

The standard things I need everyday, were better in the times, before
tech was used so widely and uncontrolled. IMO. If you need the highest
tech of tech and can live with the polluted destroyed environment
(arsen etc.), than its your opinion.




Kind Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top