Bonnie said:
Hi,
I just had my computer worked on and was told by the tech.
that I did not need Zone Alarm that it makes it harder for
my computer to boot up, and that it doesn't stop viruses,
or hackers. just want to know if this is true.
Thank you
Bonnie
Experience differs. Some people have had horrible problems trying to
install the Zone Alarm firewall (or the CA firewall, which I think is a ZA
firewall), while others have not. Speaking for myself, I'm squarely in the
first group. In fact, as an experiment I recently -- as in a week ago --
tried to install the latest version of EZ Armor 2005 on my fully updated and
patched Windows XP Professional system with SP2. It didn't work, and it
caused my computer to reboot itself automatically each time the firewall
tried to load.
The same thing is true of other third party firewalls, such as Norton.
Experience will differ. My past experience with the Norton firewall has been
mostly good -- if I install the Norton firewall as a standalone item instead
of as part of Norton Internet Security.
If you decide to go instead with the built in Windows SP2 firewall, you will
never have a problem with it. The only downside is that if some piece of
crud -- a trojan, a virus, a worm, spyware, ad nauseum -- lands on your
machine and then attempts to "phone home," the Windows firewall will allow
the communication. Third party firewalls like ZA and Norton will block it.
Therefore, they are more secure. But sometimes the additional security comes
with unwanted side effects, such as a performance hit, a stability hit, or
conflicts with other software (again, experiences differ).
Ken