Windows Vista Your Windows Experience Index

Ian

Administrator
Joined
Feb 23, 2002
Messages
19,873
Reaction score
1,499
I thought it might be interesting to see how our Vista Performance Index changes from PC to PC (and to see how it actually scales across different hardware).

I've got a Q6600 G0 2.4 @ 3.0Ghz (at the time of this benchmark), ASUS P5K, XFX GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB PCI-E, 2GB PC2-6400 C4 Extreme Performance (2x1GB) and 320GB Maxtor Diamondmax SATA2 8MB.

The scores come out at 5.9 for each item, apart from hard drives which rate at 5.6 (hence the overall score of 5.6).
 

Attachments

  • vistaindex.jpg
    vistaindex.jpg
    68.7 KB · Views: 676

floppybootstomp

sugar 'n spikes
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
20,281
Reaction score
1,794
My system is detailed in my signature.

I have one of the first 6600's made, I think, I built this system in November 2006.

Not overclocked, I couldn't get past 2.6Ghz and for the extra gain I didn't think it was worth it so I went back to stock.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • performance.jpg
    performance.jpg
    34.1 KB · Views: 1,852
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
Cant remember where to find it
laughingsmiley.gif

brb with an edit.

Ah there it is:

CPU-5.6.
Ram-4.5
GPU-4.5
Gaming-4.9 (gaming-what that?
laughingsmiley.gif
)
Disc-5.1


Base Score 4.5.

Hardware:

Allendale 6300 in a Ds3.
ATI 1650.
2 X 512 Geil ultra pc2 6400
Maxtor 120gb ATA drive.
 
Last edited:

muckshifter

I'm not weird, I'm a limited edition.
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
25,739
Reaction score
1,204
Hmmm, does it really mean anything ??

I can't see any practical use, except for bragging rights ... so, I win!

:cool:
 

Attachments

  • performance.JPG
    performance.JPG
    77.8 KB · Views: 4,527

Ian

Administrator
Joined
Feb 23, 2002
Messages
19,873
Reaction score
1,499
Nice photoshoping skills
laughingsmiley.gif


muckshifter said:
Hmmm, does it really mean anything ??

That's just it... I don't know if the Windows Experience Index really shows much at all ;) Once we've got a few more results it will be interesting to see how things compare.
 

muckshifter

I'm not weird, I'm a limited edition.
Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
25,739
Reaction score
1,204
err, sorry Ian,


That is a real snip of my score sheet ...
nod.gif


I tried photoshop once, found it difficult to even open a folder, never mind a pic. ;)


user.gif
 

Taffycat

Crunchy Cat
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
12,573
Reaction score
1,055
Here is mine. Just out of curiosity, I also tried it using my "memory boost" USB 4 GB Cruzer which produced no difference at all in the scores - although it's quite useful for other stuff:)

If anyone is interested, there is a Perfect Score website and a bit of further reading over on the Microsoft website, reveals that they are aiming to increase the Perfect Score to way beyond the current 5.9 rating. Link here.
:D

Specs: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ (2.6GHz) (Socket AM2) | 2048 MB Corsair XMS 800MHz (2x1GB) | ASUS M2N-SLI DeLuxe Dual DDR2 S-ATA II, 2 x PCI-Ex, 3 x PCI | VISTA Home Premium | 400 GB Serial ATA II HDD | 256MB GEForce 7900GS PCI Express | 500W (Peak) Quiet Dual Rail PSU | 120mm Case Fan | ZALMAN CNPS9700 TRITIUM Super Aero CoolerX2 5200
 

Attachments

  • Capture.Windows Experience Index.JPG
    Capture.Windows Experience Index.JPG
    72.5 KB · Views: 557
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 28, 2008
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
Personally I find the whole thing meaningless inasmuch as a large proportion of the weighting is gpu.....and for those like me who don't game a fancy gpu is pointless.

High end gaming rig will outscore a crunching rig.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top