Uh huh, sure.
Why the attitude? It's unprofessional and unnecessary.
If YOU paid for that pricey MSDN subscription then you already have the
resources to do your own research and should already have the expertise to
make your own judgement.
Yes - I made use of my resources - specifically an Internet connection and
Outlook Express news reader to post the OP here to get my answer - which I
got from others more helpful than yourself. I then made my own judgement
based on the helpful feedback I received. Brilliant - eh?
I have yet to see anyone run up with a gun and force someone to accept a
free MSDN subscription.
What is that supposed to mean? MSDN Premium isn't free - which you
apparently understand - but the gun thing and free MSDN? You'll have to
explain that to the simpletons such as myself.
If you have it, you paid for it (or your employer did - but then your
employer was led to believe you had a need to access to it since they
don't buy the big bucks for it just to give you a free copy of each OS
version).
??? My employer was led to believe? There you go reading way too much into
the situation - again.
What do you think is free about MSDN or the OS versions in it?
So you were asking a vague question trying to elicit an unfocused response
when you already had some specifics in mind and already knew why you might
want to pair up a 64-bit OS with your new 64-bit hardware.
There you go trying to read too much into the situation - again. And to
clarify - no - I didn't already have specific reasons in mind to go to
64-bit. I just said I was going to use Vista for a future project -
blissfully unaware of any *need* to go to to 64-bit Vista. I haven't made a
decision yet on 64-bit Vista... might install 32-bit Vista (probably will).
The vagueness part - which you so brilliantly picked up on - was to get a
high-level response. Nothing wrong with doing that if that's the level of
information you're after - as I was. You can see how effective I was in
getting my desired level of information without telling the group my life
story. The responses I received from Ken Blake (an MVP, which you aren't)
were totally helpful and exactly the sort of information I was after.
Well, with your MSDN subscription and Internet access, you certainly can
do your own research to determine if all your current applications that
are critical or important will run on a 64-bit version of Windows.
Ahhh, but that's not what I was wanting to know. "Will run?" and/or "Must
run?" are two questions that are NOT what I was wanting to know. "Must run"
and there is no question - gotta have it. "Will run" - of course practically
all 32-bit apps WILL run on 64-bit - even if some virtual machine is reqired
to run 32-bit software in a 64-bit environment. But neither of those are my
question. If you read my OP here without wearing your psychoanalytical sun
glasses you will see that I was wanting to know why anyone would *want to*
run 64-bit Windows. The question was not about apps -but about Windows, and
about why we'd *want* to run the 64-bit version of XP.
And since you claim to have an MSDN subscription then you have Vista to
play with so you can even test if the 64-bit drivers for your hardware are
usable or if they even have 64-bit versions. While many 32-bit apps might
run okay, some don't, especially games.
True - but why should I spend all that time if all I want is a high-level
response (which I got in just a few minutes).
If you play dumb then expect to get treated like a dummy. Reread your
original post. Duh.
Nobody was playing dumb. Are you just offended that I called you on your
ridiculous psychobabble and psychoanalysis?
So for what were you really fishing with such a vague query?
Read the other responses I got here - apparently you are the only person who
read too much into my OP, therefore having difficulty responding in a
helpful and relevant way (the story of your life - right?).
Sometimes what you see is what you get. Even your apparent hero, Freud, is
credited with stating that "sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." No need to
psychoanalyze to the extent that you have.
-Fred