Support for XP will end. You're grapevine is off base. Here are some links
from MS with info on XP's life cycle and the support time line. Nothing has
changed in that for XP Pro. A few months MS announced it would extend
support for XP Home to match XP Pro.
Windows Life-Cycle Policy
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/default.mspx
Microsoft Support Lifecycle Policy FAQ
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy
Microsoft Support Lifecycle - XP
http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3223
Windows Service Pack Road Map
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/servicepacks.mspx
Major cash amounts to upgrade your PC? Well that depends on how wise your
purchasing decisions were in the first place. Buy something that is
marginal in ability, it will reach the end of it's useful life sooner, and
is less capable for upgrading. On the other hand purchase a computer with
an eye toward the future, with good hardware components and software, it
will last and be easily upgradable. Don't purchase for what you need now,
buy for future needs.
This system is 5 years old, runs XP and Vista in a dual boot and runs both
well. I boot into XP rarely, mainly just to keep it updated. There were no
major changes to the base hardware over it's life. RAM/CPU are the same as
when purchased.
The only hardware upgrade I decided to make for Vista was a different video
card to support Aero which cost under $60. The old video card ran Vista
just fine, just not w/Aero, but it was also developing a fan problem so it
was going to have to be replaced eventually.
I got lucky with the printer. It is very common for printer manufactures to
not support legacy hardware with drivers for a new operating system. On top
of it, this one is several generations old from the NT days but still runs
well. No drivers from the manufacturer for Vista, but I discovered a driver
for a different printer model/manufacturer worked.
Software wise a couple of XP system utilities needed a new version for
Vista - for drive imaging and disk partitioning. Along with Vista
compatibility came new features, so there was something to be gained for the
cost. All other software and hardware migrated just fine. So the cost of
migrating to Vista on this system was minimal. 5 year life span for a video
card - that's longer than would be expected under normal conditions, plus a
couple of new software products.
As to the bad press on Vista? As Ken said that's the norm for a new OS.
Yes there are problems/issues with Vista, mainly centered around problematic
or no driver support, poor hardware and trying to shoe horn incompatible
software. This can be dealt with by intelligent research prior to making
the change.
The release of a new MS OS brings out the slimers and trolls who look for
any opportunity to bash MS products or to bash what's new, for their own
personal agendas. Heck some of these folk haven't even used the OS, yet are
so vocal about it. What you don't hear are the many people who are using
Vista and love it. You never hear that. Bad news travels loud and fast,
good news, well how many ways in how many words can you say, it works well
and I like it?
The decision to move to Vista should be based on need and an eye to the
future. It is the future OS.