Bob I said:
If you want to make a steering wheel analogy,
you would have paid to have the steering wheel permanently on the
vehicle, and when the car is scrapped out so is the steering wheel.
That's exactly the analogy (you do it better) - and we all know that
pre-Internet, the steering-wheel vendor would've just got his butt kicked
trying to sell such a no-brainer.
perhaps I should adjust the analogy. You bought the steering wheel from
the Miata vendor as an option for 1/3 the cost of the Universal mount
model and you choose to buy it instead because it was a lot cheaper. Now
you could have bought the one that you could move from car to car, but
you elected not to.
Ken Blake said:
In that case, what I recommend is that you violate the license terms, tell
Microsoft about it, and try to get them to sue you. If your view of what
they can get away with is correct, you can win a fortune on the countersuit.
You do?
The whole point is, I don't want to violate anything. I shouldn't have to.
I'm sure MS would love to sue me as they don't make enough already (even
though their OS is 10 times the price of a whole Hollywood movie DVD that I
can play on ANY DVD player) - Probably another reason why, although I will
only ever run ONE computer, I am coerced into paying for TWO XPs. You don't
have to be Socrates to see that that is plain wrong.
You had the option to buy a Version that could be MOVED from PC to PC at
a higher cost or to buy the constrained version for a lesser cost. You
simply bet on the wrong horse, you DIDN'T GET COERCED into anything.