WPA info & program?

[kurttrail]

message Brian C wrote:

That information is hidden on purpose. So you could not reset
yourself. (Mike going to getting on me for saying this). You
could try contacting the guy who made the reset patch.
Regardless a lot of people already know about this. It all over
cnet news & other website.


Brian C.

I believe the reset crack for PA is to reset the 30 day clock for
initial activation, not to reset the hardware change count.

Michaels reply:
You give good information freely, but when you are confronted and
have no real answer you become an as*hole.

When haven't I had an answered? I had already answered all your
mischaracterizations previously in the thread, "Creating system
recovery disc," and I felt no need to repeat myself just because you
repeated and expanded on them.

Why do you do this?

Because it is a waste of time argueing with you once you start
perverting reality. Even this reply is a waste, but just on the off
chance that somebody other than you cares, about all this, I'm just
putting this in some
context.

It
must be ego driven, because there is no other reason to drege up
denigrating posts from 2 yrs ago like the one below you posted as a
recent reply to a confrontational thread between yourself and I that
I thought you would have the integrity to use your intellect rather
than your crass as*hole mentality.

I brought up an unbiased look at our newsgroup "relationship," from
Fred Retread. That it is NEARLY 2 years old, doesn't make it any
less valid today. I refuse to repeat myself over & over again
answering your sly mischaracterizations in an effort to get me to
appear angry. I've learned from Fred's constructive criticism.

<snip> Your reply pasting text from posts that are two years old and
if anyone really looks at the alleged accusation that I was lying
would see it was a misunderstanding that kurttrail used as a unjust
assessment of the entire thread. See the below and you will see his
agenda.

For anyone that really cares, and I really do suspect that Mike is
the only
one that really does, please read this in the context of the whole
thread, and see for yourself, if Fred's criticism from nearly two
years ago is or isn't still applicable today.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=...=4b0201c42bfd%24abdeeb90%24a101280a%40phx.gbl

Ok, I lied. Sue me!

I have some more to say, and I'm not gonna let even my own words
stand in the way! <vbg>

"In this thread as well as in the 'licensing' one, and all the
others I've read for that matter, I think kurt won the legitimate
argument early on. Then you switched to the strategy of slyly
mischaracterizing something he had said, which gets him every time,
and makes him look
like an angry person. At the end of the resulting spiral of posts,
the points are forgotten and you play the part of a frustrated
rational
person bowing out of the situation. I've never been clear on what
trolling is. Is that trolling?" - Fred Retread [
http://www.microscum.com/mlslies/ - Post # 42 ]

I have the ability to learn from the constructive criticism of
others. I'm not going to appear as blowing my top with you over your
deliberate mischaracterizations, and will learn from my past
mistakes, before this degenerates further into the madness [mine
apparently is anger, yours obviously is lunacy], as seen at the
above link. So I'm just gonna jump over the middle part, and just
skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just
let you squeal over what a horrible person I am! <vbg>

"I f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull, and when I'm done I let
my dog f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull too! ;^)"

Squeal away, Mikey! PSML!

Squeal away! I was laughing so hard I even miss-spelled PMSL! But
the funniest part is that Mike had to export his squealing to
another thread! ROFL!

There is no squealing on my part, just a realistic description of your
agenda. I am no longer shocked by your rhetoric, but I am offended by
it. Any normal person would be. Normal people don't use your tactics
to strong-arm an opinion or point of view. Hope you didn't piss
yourself for no reason. LOL.
BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose the
wrong post to reply to.

Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "So I'm just gonna jump
over the middle part, and just skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just let
you squeal over what a horrible person I am!"

Hell, not only did you forget the point, you forgot the whole thread! ROFL!

Please, oh pretty please, squeal some more for me! <vbg>

Oh, and Mike, this has nothing to do with my agenda. This is merely for my
own personal entertainment purposes, my faithful little organ-grinder!
"Thanks for the memories!"

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[kurttrail]

This I plagarized from Howard Stern nearly two years ago, and requoted in
the thread "Creating system recovery disc." I don't really own a dog, so no
animals were harmed in any way, as a result of my pirated humour.

And all of the above is the closing of my last post in that same thread.

And this is a small part of my reply to Mike's OP in this thread.

Who wrote this?

I did, but it is hard to tell since Mikey didn't quote my words that he
"mistakenly" exported from that other thread.

http://groups.google.com/[email protected]&rnum=1&prev=/groups?q=g:thl14623368
09d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D4b0201c42bf
d%2524abdeeb90%2524a101280a%2540phx.gbl

Ok, I lied. Sue me!

I have some more to say, and I'm not gonna let even my own words
stand in the way! <vbg>

"In this thread as well as in the 'licensing' one, and all the
others I've read for that matter, I think kurt won the legitimate
argument early on. Then you switched to the strategy of slyly
mischaracterizing something he had said, which gets him every time,
and makes him look
like an angry person. At the end of the resulting spiral of posts,
the points are forgotten and you play the part of a frustrated
rational
person bowing out of the situation. I've never been clear on what
trolling is. Is that trolling?" - Fred Retread [
http://www.microscum.com/mlslies/ - Post # 42 ]

I have the ability to learn from the constructive criticism of
others. I'm not going to appear as blowing my top with you over
your deliberate mischaracterizations, and will learn from my past
mistakes, before this degenerates further into the madness [mine
apparently is anger, yours obviously is lunacy], as seen at the
above link. So I'm just gonna jump over the middle part, and just
skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just
let you squeal over what a horrible person I am! <vbg>

"I f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull, and when I'm done I
let my dog f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull too! ;^)"

Squeal away, Mikey! PSML!

Squeal away! I was laughing so hard I even miss-spelled PMSL! But
the funniest part is that Mike had to export his squealing to
another thread! ROFL!

There is no squealing on my part, just a realistic description of
your agenda. I am no longer shocked by your rhetoric, but I am
offended by it. Any normal person would be. Normal people don't use
your tactics to strong-arm an opinion or point of view. Hope you
didn't piss yourself for no reason. LOL.
BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose the
wrong post to reply to.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Michael Stevens]

Michael Stevens wrote:

message Brian C wrote:

That information is hidden on purpose. So you could not reset
yourself. (Mike going to getting on me for saying this). You
could try contacting the guy who made the reset patch.
Regardless a lot of people already know about this. It all over
cnet news & other website.


Brian C.

I believe the reset crack for PA is to reset the 30 day clock for
initial activation, not to reset the hardware change count.

Michaels reply:
You give good information freely, but when you are confronted and
have no real answer you become an as*hole.

When haven't I had an answered? I had already answered all your
mischaracterizations previously in the thread, "Creating system
recovery disc," and I felt no need to repeat myself just because you
repeated and expanded on them.

Why do you do this?

Because it is a waste of time argueing with you once you start
perverting reality. Even this reply is a waste, but just on the off
chance that somebody other than you cares, about all this, I'm just
putting this in some
context.

It
must be ego driven, because there is no other reason to drege up
denigrating posts from 2 yrs ago like the one below you posted as a
recent reply to a confrontational thread between yourself and I that
I thought you would have the integrity to use your intellect rather
than your crass as*hole mentality.

I brought up an unbiased look at our newsgroup "relationship," from
Fred Retread. That it is NEARLY 2 years old, doesn't make it any
less valid today. I refuse to repeat myself over & over again
answering your sly mischaracterizations in an effort to get me to
appear angry. I've learned from Fred's constructive criticism.


<snip> Your reply pasting text from posts that are two years old and
if anyone really looks at the alleged accusation that I was lying
would see it was a misunderstanding that kurttrail used as a unjust
assessment of the entire thread. See the below and you will see his
agenda.

For anyone that really cares, and I really do suspect that Mike is
the only
one that really does, please read this in the context of the whole
thread, and see for yourself, if Fred's criticism from nearly two
years ago is or isn't still applicable today.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=...=4b0201c42bfd%24abdeeb90%24a101280a%40phx.gbl

Ok, I lied. Sue me!

I have some more to say, and I'm not gonna let even my own words
stand in the way! <vbg>

"In this thread as well as in the 'licensing' one, and all the
others I've read for that matter, I think kurt won the legitimate
argument early on. Then you switched to the strategy of slyly
mischaracterizing something he had said, which gets him every time,
and makes him look
like an angry person. At the end of the resulting spiral of posts,
the points are forgotten and you play the part of a frustrated
rational
person bowing out of the situation. I've never been clear on what
trolling is. Is that trolling?" - Fred Retread [
http://www.microscum.com/mlslies/ - Post # 42 ]

I have the ability to learn from the constructive criticism of
others. I'm not going to appear as blowing my top with you over your
deliberate mischaracterizations, and will learn from my past
mistakes, before this degenerates further into the madness [mine
apparently is anger, yours obviously is lunacy], as seen at the
above link. So I'm just gonna jump over the middle part, and just
skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just
let you squeal over what a horrible person I am! <vbg>

"I f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull, and when I'm done I let
my dog f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull too! ;^)"

Squeal away, Mikey! PSML!

Squeal away! I was laughing so hard I even miss-spelled PMSL! But
the funniest part is that Mike had to export his squealing to
another thread! ROFL!

There is no squealing on my part, just a realistic description of your
agenda. I am no longer shocked by your rhetoric, but I am offended by
it. Any normal person would be. Normal people don't use your tactics
to strong-arm an opinion or point of view. Hope you didn't piss
yourself for no reason. LOL.
BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose the
wrong post to reply to.

Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "So I'm just gonna jump
over the middle part, and just skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just let
you squeal over what a horrible person I am!"

Hell, not only did you forget the point, you forgot the whole thread!
ROFL!

Please, oh pretty please, squeal some more for me! <vbg>

Oh, and Mike, this has nothing to do with my agenda. This is merely for
my
own personal entertainment purposes, my faithful little organ-grinder!
"Thanks for the memories!"

<Your said>
"Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "
<Have no clue why you said it>
Have not a clue what you are gloating about, I explained why this thread
"exported". Where was the squealing? I didn't see any and you DID show your
malicious "agenda" very clear and continue to show it. Even admit it" This
is merely for my own personal entertainment purposes". LOL I would say this
is a prime agenda on your part, and you have displayed it by your web site
page and numerous posts with malicious attacks on my character, that you
have no legal right or knowledge to make these attacks.
You are a very good opportunist with no limits to throttle how you use an
opportunity. Your replies just enforce the point.

--

Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP
(e-mail address removed)
http://michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm

 

[kurttrail]

message

message Michael Stevens wrote:

message Brian C wrote:

That information is hidden on purpose. So you could not reset
yourself. (Mike going to getting on me for saying this). You
could try contacting the guy who made the reset patch.
Regardless a lot of people already know about this. It all over
cnet news & other website.


Brian C.

I believe the reset crack for PA is to reset the 30 day clock for
initial activation, not to reset the hardware change count.

Michaels reply:
You give good information freely, but when you are confronted and
have no real answer you become an as*hole.

When haven't I had an answered? I had already answered all your
mischaracterizations previously in the thread, "Creating system
recovery disc," and I felt no need to repeat myself just because
you
repeated and expanded on them.

Why do you do this?

Because it is a waste of time argueing with you once you start
perverting reality. Even this reply is a waste, but just on the
off
chance that somebody other than you cares, about all this, I'm just
putting this in some
context.

It
must be ego driven, because there is no other reason to drege up
denigrating posts from 2 yrs ago like the one below you posted as
a
recent reply to a confrontational thread between yourself and I
that
I thought you would have the integrity to use your intellect
rather
than your crass as*hole mentality.

I brought up an unbiased look at our newsgroup "relationship," from
Fred Retread. That it is NEARLY 2 years old, doesn't make it any
less valid today. I refuse to repeat myself over & over again
answering your sly mischaracterizations in an effort to get me to
appear angry. I've learned from Fred's constructive criticism.


<snip> Your reply pasting text from posts that are two years old
and
if anyone really looks at the alleged accusation that I was lying
would see it was a misunderstanding that kurttrail used as a
unjust
assessment of the entire thread. See the below and you will see
his
agenda.

For anyone that really cares, and I really do suspect that Mike is
the only
one that really does, please read this in the context of the whole
thread, and see for yourself, if Fred's criticism from nearly two
years ago is or isn't still applicable today.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=...=4b0201c42bfd%24abdeeb90%24a101280a%40phx.gbl

Ok, I lied. Sue me!

I have some more to say, and I'm not gonna let even my own words
stand in the way! <vbg>

"In this thread as well as in the 'licensing' one, and all the
others I've read for that matter, I think kurt won the legitimate
argument early on. Then you switched to the strategy of slyly
mischaracterizing something he had said, which gets him every
time,
and makes him look
like an angry person. At the end of the resulting spiral of
posts,
the points are forgotten and you play the part of a frustrated
rational
person bowing out of the situation. I've never been clear on what
trolling is. Is that trolling?" - Fred Retread [
http://www.microscum.com/mlslies/ - Post # 42 ]

I have the ability to learn from the constructive criticism of
others. I'm not going to appear as blowing my top with you over
your
deliberate mischaracterizations, and will learn from my past
mistakes, before this degenerates further into the madness [mine
apparently is anger, yours obviously is lunacy], as seen at the
above link. So I'm just gonna jump over the middle part, and just
skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just
let you squeal over what a horrible person I am! <vbg>

"I f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull, and when I'm done I
let
my dog f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull too! ;^)"

Squeal away, Mikey! PSML!

Squeal away! I was laughing so hard I even miss-spelled PMSL! But
the funniest part is that Mike had to export his squealing to
another thread! ROFL!

There is no squealing on my part, just a realistic description of
your
agenda. I am no longer shocked by your rhetoric, but I am offended
by
it. Any normal person would be. Normal people don't use your tactics
to strong-arm an opinion or point of view. Hope you didn't piss
yourself for no reason. LOL.
BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose the
wrong post to reply to.

Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "So I'm just gonna
jump
over the middle part, and just skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just let
you squeal over what a horrible person I am!"

Hell, not only did you forget the point, you forgot the whole thread!
ROFL!

Please, oh pretty please, squeal some more for me! <vbg>

Oh, and Mike, this has nothing to do with my agenda. This is merely
for
my
own personal entertainment purposes, my faithful little
organ-grinder! "Thanks for the memories!"

<Your said>
"Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "
<Have no clue why you said it>

ROFL! You just have no clue, Period.

Have not a clue what you are gloating about, I explained why this
thread "exported".

Like it is a credible explanation?

"BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I
originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose the wrong post
to
reply to."

LOL! You obviously never had any intention of replying to the post in
it's proper thread, otherwise there would have been no need to repeat my
post from that proper thread at the end of your first post in this one,
as it would have already been a part of your reply.

Where was the squealing? I didn't see any and you
DID show your
malicious "agenda" very clear and continue to show it. Even admit it"
This
is merely for my own personal entertainment purposes".

I like how you cut out the prior sentence that contradicts you, even
before you wrote, ". . . . I didn't see any and you DID show your
malicious "agenda" very clear and continue to show it. Even admit it"
This is merely for my own personal entertainment purposes"."

"Oh, and Mike, this has nothing to do with my agenda. This is merely
for my
own personal entertainment purposes, my faithful little organ-grinder!"

"Which bring us back to DOE" or in this case Fred.

"In this thread as well as in the 'licensing' one, and all the others
I've read for that matter, I think kurt won the legitimate argument
early on. Then you switched to the strategy of slyly mischaracterizing
something he had said, which gets him every time, and makes him look
like an angry person. At the end of the resulting spiral of posts, the
points are forgotten and you play the part of a frustrated rational
person bowing out of the situation. I've never been clear on what
trolling is. Is that trolling?" - Fred Retread [
http://www.microscum.com/mlslies/ - Post # 42 ]

The only difference between nearly two years ago & today is that I'm not
go repeat myself over and over again, just because you want to repeat
your delusions over and over again.

LOL I would
say this
is a prime agenda on your part, and you have displayed it by your web
site
page and numerous posts with malicious attacks on my character, that
you
have no legal right or knowledge to make these attacks.

Sue me then, and PROVE IT! That would be your right! Or you can squeal
some more, as that is also your right! My guess is that you enjoy
squealling more!

And it is my right not to answer your delusions, and mindf*ck you
instead. I must be a very good mindf*cker, to get you to squeal so long
and hard, over something so stupid, that nobody but you cares about!

You are a very good opportunist with no limits to throttle how you
use an
opportunity.

Huh? And what do I have to gain from any of this Mikey? NOBODY CARES!
Not ME, not ANYONE, but YOU!

Your replies just enforce the point.

What point? The one your head comes to?

Actually WHICH point would be the better question! The one that me
agreeing with another poster that Carey was wrong to tell someone that
they can't make their own recoverey CDs, was an unjust ragging on Carey?
[Do you even remember that delusional point anymore?] Or this present
one, that I ain't just mindf*cking you for my personal amusement, but it
is part of my "agenda" to make you look like a fool. I hate to tell
you, but I don't have to try to make you look like a fool, you do a much
better job of that all on your own! You came to me, I did not seek you
out. Unless I have some way to force you to respond to me, I would have
no way to fullfill the delusional agenda you think I have against you,
if you don't reply to me first. So if you really believe that I have
some nefarious agenda against you personally, then your best defense
would be never to respond to any of my posts that was written in reply
to someone else. But I don't believe that even you believe your
delusions, and the only reason you continue to seek me out, is in hopes
that one day you might actually get the better of me.

So if you really think I have some agenda against you, don't seek me
out! Make me come to you to fullfill my "agenda" against you. Oh
that's right, I hardly ever respond to one of your replies to others
before you have first responded to me in another part of the same thread
or you mention me in reply to someone else, so if you don't reply to me
then you wouldn't be able to even convince yourself about your delusions
of my agenda against you!

Thanks, I knew I could count on you to squeal for me some more! And you
do it so well! Thanks again!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Kelly]

Thank you! Is so hard to decipher this stuff between you two. However,
Howard quotes (of this nature or any kind) needs to be kept out of this
group, (in my opinion) and besides, if this isn't a true statement, his nose
may be growing as I type and how horrible would that be? (

This I plagarized from Howard Stern nearly two years ago, and requoted in
the thread "Creating system recovery disc." I don't really own a dog, so
no
animals were harmed in any way, as a result of my pirated humour.

And all of the above is the closing of my last post in that same thread.

And this is a small part of my reply to Mike's OP in this thread.

Who wrote this?

I did, but it is hard to tell since Mikey didn't quote my words that he
"mistakenly" exported from that other thread.

message Michael Stevens wrote:

message Brian C wrote:

That information is hidden on purpose. So you could not reset
yourself. (Mike going to getting on me for saying this). You
could try contacting the guy who made the reset patch.
Regardless a lot of people already know about this. It all over
cnet news & other website.


Brian C.

I believe the reset crack for PA is to reset the 30 day clock for
initial activation, not to reset the hardware change count.

Michaels reply:
You give good information freely, but when you are confronted and
have no real answer you become an as*hole.

When haven't I had an answered? I had already answered all your
mischaracterizations previously in the thread, "Creating system
recovery disc," and I felt no need to repeat myself just because
you repeated and expanded on them.

Why do you do this?

Because it is a waste of time argueing with you once you start
perverting reality. Even this reply is a waste, but just on the
off chance that somebody other than you cares, about all this, I'm
just putting this in some
context.

It
must be ego driven, because there is no other reason to drege up
denigrating posts from 2 yrs ago like the one below you posted as a
recent reply to a confrontational thread between yourself and I
that I thought you would have the integrity to use your intellect
rather than your crass as*hole mentality.

I brought up an unbiased look at our newsgroup "relationship," from
Fred Retread. That it is NEARLY 2 years old, doesn't make it any
less valid today. I refuse to repeat myself over & over again
answering your sly mischaracterizations in an effort to get me to
appear angry. I've learned
from Fred's constructive criticism.


<snip> Your reply pasting text from posts that are two years old
and if anyone really looks at the alleged accusation that I was
lying would see it was a misunderstanding that kurttrail used as a
unjust assessment of the entire thread. See the below and you will
see his agenda.

For anyone that really cares, and I really do suspect that Mike is
the only
one that really does, please read this in the context of the whole
thread,
and see for yourself, if Fred's criticism from nearly two years ago
is or isn't still applicable today.

http://groups.google.com/[email protected]&rnum=1&prev=/groups?q=g:thl14623368
09d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D4b0201c42bf
d%2524abdeeb90%2524a101280a%2540phx.gbl

Ok, I lied. Sue me!

I have some more to say, and I'm not gonna let even my own words
stand in the way! <vbg>

"In this thread as well as in the 'licensing' one, and all the
others I've read for that matter, I think kurt won the legitimate
argument early on. Then you switched to the strategy of slyly
mischaracterizing something he had said, which gets him every time,
and makes him look
like an angry person. At the end of the resulting spiral of posts,
the points are forgotten and you play the part of a frustrated
rational
person bowing out of the situation. I've never been clear on what
trolling is. Is that trolling?" - Fred Retread [
http://www.microscum.com/mlslies/ - Post # 42 ]

I have the ability to learn from the constructive criticism of
others. I'm not going to appear as blowing my top with you over
your deliberate mischaracterizations, and will learn from my past
mistakes, before this degenerates further into the madness [mine
apparently is anger, yours obviously is lunacy], as seen at the
above link. So I'm just gonna jump over the middle part, and just
skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just
let you squeal over what a horrible person I am! <vbg>

"I f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull, and when I'm done I
let my dog f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull too! ;^)"

Squeal away, Mikey! PSML!

Squeal away! I was laughing so hard I even miss-spelled PMSL! But
the funniest part is that Mike had to export his squealing to
another thread! ROFL!

There is no squealing on my part, just a realistic description of
your agenda. I am no longer shocked by your rhetoric, but I am
offended by it. Any normal person would be. Normal people don't use
your tactics to strong-arm an opinion or point of view. Hope you
didn't piss yourself for no reason. LOL.
BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose the
wrong post to reply to.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[kurttrail]

Thank you! Is so hard to decipher this stuff between you two.
However, Howard quotes (of this nature or any kind) needs to be kept
out of this group, (in my opinion) and besides, if this isn't a true
statement, his nose may be growing as I type and how horrible would
that be? (

It wasn't a quote of Howard's. I was quoting myself plagararizing Howard
nearly two years ago. I was giving Mikey something to squeal over.

I don't think Mikey mischaratizations belong in this group either. Oh well,
that's life! Can't ban all the lunatics from the face of the earth, because
who would we vote for in November!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Kelly]

I don't think Mikey mischaratizations belong in this group either. Oh
well,
that's life! Can't ban all the lunatics from the face of the earth,
because
who would we vote for in November!

 

[Michael Stevens]

message

Michael Stevens wrote:

message Michael Stevens wrote:

message Brian C wrote:

That information is hidden on purpose. So you could not reset
yourself. (Mike going to getting on me for saying this). You
could try contacting the guy who made the reset patch.
Regardless a lot of people already know about this. It all
over cnet news & other website.


Brian C.

I believe the reset crack for PA is to reset the 30 day clock
for initial activation, not to reset the hardware change count.

Michaels reply:
You give good information freely, but when you are confronted and
have no real answer you become an as*hole.

When haven't I had an answered? I had already answered all your
mischaracterizations previously in the thread, "Creating system
recovery disc," and I felt no need to repeat myself just because
you
repeated and expanded on them.

Why do you do this?

Because it is a waste of time argueing with you once you start
perverting reality. Even this reply is a waste, but just on the
off
chance that somebody other than you cares, about all this, I'm
just putting this in some
context.

It
must be ego driven, because there is no other reason to drege up
denigrating posts from 2 yrs ago like the one below you posted as
a
recent reply to a confrontational thread between yourself and I
that
I thought you would have the integrity to use your intellect
rather
than your crass as*hole mentality.

I brought up an unbiased look at our newsgroup "relationship,"
from Fred Retread. That it is NEARLY 2 years old, doesn't make
it any less valid today. I refuse to repeat myself over & over
again answering your sly mischaracterizations in an effort to get
me to appear angry. I've learned from Fred's constructive
criticism.


<snip> Your reply pasting text from posts that are two years old
and
if anyone really looks at the alleged accusation that I was lying
would see it was a misunderstanding that kurttrail used as a
unjust
assessment of the entire thread. See the below and you will see
his
agenda.

For anyone that really cares, and I really do suspect that Mike is
the only
one that really does, please read this in the context of the whole
thread, and see for yourself, if Fred's criticism from nearly two
years ago is or isn't still applicable today.


http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=...=4b0201c42bfd%24abdeeb90%24a101280a%40phx.gbl

Ok, I lied. Sue me!

I have some more to say, and I'm not gonna let even my own words
stand in the way! <vbg>

"In this thread as well as in the 'licensing' one, and all the
others I've read for that matter, I think kurt won the legitimate
argument early on. Then you switched to the strategy of slyly
mischaracterizing something he had said, which gets him every
time,
and makes him look
like an angry person. At the end of the resulting spiral of
posts,
the points are forgotten and you play the part of a frustrated
rational
person bowing out of the situation. I've never been clear on
what trolling is. Is that trolling?" - Fred Retread [
http://www.microscum.com/mlslies/ - Post # 42 ]

I have the ability to learn from the constructive criticism of
others. I'm not going to appear as blowing my top with you over
your
deliberate mischaracterizations, and will learn from my past
mistakes, before this degenerates further into the madness [mine
apparently is anger, yours obviously is lunacy], as seen at the
above link. So I'm just gonna jump over the middle part, and
just skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I just
let you squeal over what a horrible person I am! <vbg>

"I f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull, and when I'm done I
let
my dog f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull too! ;^)"

Squeal away, Mikey! PSML!

Squeal away! I was laughing so hard I even miss-spelled PMSL!
But the funniest part is that Mike had to export his squealing to
another thread! ROFL!

There is no squealing on my part, just a realistic description of
your
agenda. I am no longer shocked by your rhetoric, but I am offended
by
it. Any normal person would be. Normal people don't use your
tactics to strong-arm an opinion or point of view. Hope you didn't
piss yourself for no reason. LOL.
BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose
the wrong post to reply to.


Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "So I'm just gonna
jump
over the middle part, and just skip to the part where we've
forgotten what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway]
and I just let you squeal over what a horrible person I am!"

Hell, not only did you forget the point, you forgot the whole
thread! ROFL!

Please, oh pretty please, squeal some more for me! <vbg>

Oh, and Mike, this has nothing to do with my agenda. This is merely
for
my
own personal entertainment purposes, my faithful little
organ-grinder! "Thanks for the memories!"

<Your said>
"Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "
<Have no clue why you said it>

ROFL! You just have no clue, Period.

Have not a clue what you are gloating about, I explained why this
thread "exported".

Like it is a credible explanation?

"BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I
originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose the wrong post
to
reply to."

LOL! You obviously never had any intention of replying to the post in
it's proper thread, otherwise there would have been no need to repeat
my post from that proper thread at the end of your first post in this
one, as it would have already been a part of your reply.

I hate even making another post to this thread, but your insistence that I
am lying makes it necessary to show how you misinterrupterpt what really
happened.
If you really looked at the thread I replied to, you would realize I would
not ever "export" to such an irrelevant thread as this one. I was replying
from a remote desktop and for some reason my newsgroup rules did not show
the same results. I copied the reply from the remote desktop system I was
accessing the newsgroups to the computer I usually post from and that I made
the original reply that was lost. I did a CTRL+H and posted to what I
thought was the same thread. I quickly scanned the post, saw a Mike and
thought it was the correct thread. All the rest of the crap you posted
assumes your assessment of my mistake was intentional. Just like the
original accusation of my LIE, this also a BIG misunderstanding.
I do have some screen shots to correrabate my explanation of the real way
the events unfolded.
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply1.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply2.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply3.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply4.jpg

The part snipped was really unsubstantanative crap.

--

Michael Stevens MS-MVP XP
(e-mail address removed)
http://michaelstevenstech.com
For a better newsgroup experience. Setup a newsreader.
http://michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm

 

[Testy]

Michael, with regards to kurt it is best to "let lying dogs sleep."

Testy

 

[kurttrail]

Michael, with regards to kurt it is best to "let lying dogs sleep."

Testy

I may be a "dog," but I ain't asleep.

But I agree with you that Mike should just shut his trap.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[kurttrail]

I hate even making another post to this thread, but your insistence
that I
am lying makes it necessary to show how you misinterrupterpt what
really
happened.

No. It's your inability to get the better of me that drives you onward.

"Onward MS Soldiers! Marching as to war. With the cross of
Windows, going on before!"

If I were the person you try to characterize me as, then what I say
would be totally inconsequential to you, and you would feel no need to
respond to anything I "insist" about. But obviously that isn't the
case, what I say means too much to you, so much that you just can't
leave me be.

If you really looked at the thread I replied to, you would realize I
would
not ever "export" to such an irrelevant thread as this one.

Why would I come to that conclusion? I thought it made total sense
because you opened your first post in this thread by saying that I give
good information. "You give good information freely, but when you are
confronted and have no real answer you become an as*hole." In the other
thread, that would not have made sense, because you wouldn't have
characterized anything I said in that thread as "good information," as
your whole moronic point in that thread was that I "ragging on Carey
unjustly and . . . . won't admit it."

I was
replying
from a remote desktop and for some reason my newsgroup rules did not
show
the same results. I copied the reply from the remote desktop system I
was
accessing the newsgroups to the computer I usually post from and that
I made
the original reply that was lost. I did a CTRL+H and posted to what I
thought was the same thread. I quickly scanned the post, saw a Mike
and
thought it was the correct thread.

You saw one Mike post! ROFL! You are the only Mike that has posted to
this thread, and you hadn't posted to this thread yet, before your
"mistake!" Either you are the most unobservant person on the
planet, or your "mistake" was one of your own creation.

http://www.microscum.com/misc/BS/Recoverythread.jpg
http://www.microscum.com/misc/BS/WPAthread.jpg

The original thread can't be viewed in it's entirety on 1024x768 screen.
This thread, before your "mistake," would have fit on a 800x600 screen
with room to spare! And now you are seeing delusions too. "I quickly
scanned the post, saw a Mike . . . ." yet there wasn't a Mike that
posted to this thread, before your "mistake."

All the rest of the crap you posted
assumes your assessment of my mistake was intentional. Just like the
original accusation of my LIE, this also a BIG misunderstanding.

Yeah, you misunderstood over & over again then, even after being
repeatedly told and shown your "misunderstanding!" If it acts like a
duck, looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck . . . . " You certainly
are no swan!

I do have some screen shots to correrabate my explanation of the real
way
the events unfolded.
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply1.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply2.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply3.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply4.jpg

The part snipped was really unsubstantanative crap.

You should take heed of what you call "unsubstantanative [sic] crap."
You
would have a much easier time trying to convince people that I have some
agenda against you, by making me come to you, instead of continually
putting yourself in my way. You're like a bitch that begs a guy to f*ck
her, only to cry rape later. Stop being a victim of your own creation!
If you really think I'm such a scumbag USENET rapist, stop going out of
your way to reply to my posts to other people! Make me stalk you,
instead of you
stalking me! But then you would have nothing to squeal about, because I
hardly ever reply to your posts to others. And we all know how much you
love to squeal!

Do you have anymore squealing left in you, Miss Piggy? ;-)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[kurttrail]

message
Michael Stevens wrote:

message Michael Stevens wrote:

in message Brian C wrote:

That information is hidden on purpose. So you could not reset
yourself. (Mike going to getting on me for saying this).
You could try contacting the guy who made the reset patch.
Regardless a lot of people already know about this. It all
over cnet news & other website.


Brian C.

I believe the reset crack for PA is to reset the 30 day clock
for initial activation, not to reset the hardware change count.

Michaels reply:
You give good information freely, but when you are confronted
and have no real answer you become an as*hole.

When haven't I had an answered? I had already answered all your
mischaracterizations previously in the thread, "Creating system
recovery disc," and I felt no need to repeat myself just because
you
repeated and expanded on them.

Why do you do this?

Because it is a waste of time argueing with you once you start
perverting reality. Even this reply is a waste, but just on the
off
chance that somebody other than you cares, about all this, I'm
just putting this in some
context.

It
must be ego driven, because there is no other reason to drege up
denigrating posts from 2 yrs ago like the one below you posted
as a
recent reply to a confrontational thread between yourself and I
that
I thought you would have the integrity to use your intellect
rather
than your crass as*hole mentality.

I brought up an unbiased look at our newsgroup "relationship,"
from Fred Retread. That it is NEARLY 2 years old, doesn't make
it any less valid today. I refuse to repeat myself over & over
again answering your sly mischaracterizations in an effort to get
me to appear angry. I've learned from Fred's constructive
criticism.


<snip> Your reply pasting text from posts that are two years old
and
if anyone really looks at the alleged accusation that I was
lying would see it was a misunderstanding that kurttrail used
as a unjust
assessment of the entire thread. See the below and you will see
his
agenda.

For anyone that really cares, and I really do suspect that Mike
is the only
one that really does, please read this in the context of the
whole thread, and see for yourself, if Fred's criticism from
nearly two years ago is or isn't still applicable today.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=...=4b0201c42bfd%24abdeeb90%24a101280a%40phx.gbl

Ok, I lied. Sue me!

I have some more to say, and I'm not gonna let even my own words
stand in the way! <vbg>

"In this thread as well as in the 'licensing' one, and all the
others I've read for that matter, I think kurt won the
legitimate argument early on. Then you switched to the
strategy of slyly mischaracterizing something he had said,
which gets him every time,
and makes him look
like an angry person. At the end of the resulting spiral of
posts,
the points are forgotten and you play the part of a frustrated
rational
person bowing out of the situation. I've never been clear on
what trolling is. Is that trolling?" - Fred Retread [
http://www.microscum.com/mlslies/ - Post # 42 ]

I have the ability to learn from the constructive criticism of
others. I'm not going to appear as blowing my top with you over
your
deliberate mischaracterizations, and will learn from my past
mistakes, before this degenerates further into the madness [mine
apparently is anger, yours obviously is lunacy], as seen at the
above link. So I'm just gonna jump over the middle part, and
just skip to the part where we've forgotten
what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway] and I
just let you squeal over what a horrible person I am! <vbg>

"I f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull, and when I'm done I
let
my dog f*ck you're dead daddy's diseased skull too! ;^)"

Squeal away, Mikey! PSML!

Squeal away! I was laughing so hard I even miss-spelled PMSL!
But the funniest part is that Mike had to export his squealing to
another thread! ROFL!

There is no squealing on my part, just a realistic description of
your
agenda. I am no longer shocked by your rhetoric, but I am offended
by
it. Any normal person would be. Normal people don't use your
tactics to strong-arm an opinion or point of view. Hope you didn't
piss yourself for no reason. LOL.
BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose
the wrong post to reply to.


Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "So I'm just gonna
jump
over the middle part, and just skip to the part where we've
forgotten what the point is, [obviously you already have anyway]
and I just let you squeal over what a horrible person I am!"

Hell, not only did you forget the point, you forgot the whole
thread! ROFL!

Please, oh pretty please, squeal some more for me! <vbg>

Oh, and Mike, this has nothing to do with my agenda. This is
merely for
my
own personal entertainment purposes, my faithful little
organ-grinder! "Thanks for the memories!"
<Your said>
"Squeal Away! I did promise to let you do it! "
<Have no clue why you said it>

ROFL! You just have no clue, Period.

Have not a clue what you are gloating about, I explained why this
thread "exported".

Like it is a credible explanation?

"BTW, the export of the thread was a mistake. I had a crash on the
system I
originally started the reply and when I resumed I chose the wrong
post to
reply to."

LOL! You obviously never had any intention of replying to the post
in it's proper thread, otherwise there would have been no need to
repeat my post from that proper thread at the end of your first post
in this one, as it would have already been a part of your reply.

I hate even making another post to this thread, but your insistence
that I am lying makes it necessary to show how you misinterrupterpt
what really happened.
If you really looked at the thread I replied to, you would realize I
would not ever "export" to such an irrelevant thread as this one. I
was replying from a remote desktop and for some reason my newsgroup
rules did not show the same results. I copied the reply from the
remote desktop system I was accessing the newsgroups to the computer
I usually post from and that I made the original reply that was lost.
I did a CTRL+H and posted to what I thought was the same thread. I
quickly scanned the post, saw a Mike and thought it was the correct
thread. All the rest of the crap you posted assumes your assessment
of my mistake was intentional. Just like the original accusation of
my LIE, this also a BIG misunderstanding.
I do have some screen shots to correrabate my explanation of the real
way the events unfolded.
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply1.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply2.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply3.jpg
http://michaelstevenstech.com/kurtreply4.jpg

The part snipped was really unsubstantanative crap.

http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:th...-8&[email protected]

Now you even have the c-suckers at MS trying to help you out Mikey!

"Onward MS Soldiers!"

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[kurttrail]

Oh, and by the way. The only reason I figured out that my reply got
censored off MS's server, was because OE crashed on me and corrupted the dbx
file, and I had to reset this newsgroup, but wouldn't you know it, I was
able to figure which thread and post to reply to!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:th...-8&[email protected]

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Don Burnette]

Oh, and by the way. The only reason I figured out that my reply got
censored off MS's server, was because OE crashed on me and corrupted
the dbx file, and I had to reset this newsgroup, but wouldn't you
know it, I was able to figure which thread and post to reply to!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:th...-8&[email protected]



Keep an eye out for those black helicopters.
Whoa, what is that sound in the distance? Could it be the men in the white
coats??

 

[kurttrail]

http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:th...-8&[email protected]



Keep an eye out for those black helicopters.
Whoa, what is that sound in the distance? Could it be the men in the
white coats??

I can prove it, if you are willing. Can you disprove it?

Nope, all you can do is talk about BLACK Helicopters, and WHITE coats. I
wonder why that is? Black & White. It because you live in a monochrome
world, where there are only absolutes. Everything is either Black or White
to you.

I live in a full spectrum of color's world. I'm willing to see all sides of
any situation. Too bad you couldn't say the same thing with a straight
face.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Brian C]

Kurttrail.
Some people here think you are crazy. I think you just have a
different view but don’t know how to be constructive and not be rude.
You telling people off because you disagree with a point of view is
wrong.

I do agree the activation should stay out of the picture. Microsoft
could fix this problem real easy but refused to do so. Selling all
the retail operating systems(Full version 98se, me, xp e.t.c.)
directly for $50.00 without any support and no activation required


This way Microsoft would know who has a legal version of windows.
(They would make more money in the long run). I heard on tv it only
cost under $1.00 to make a cd (Also, take money order as well).

This way everyone would have a legal version.


Brian C.

 

[kurttrail]

Kurttrail.
Some people here think you are crazy.

Those that do, aren't those whose opinions would matter to me.

I think you just have a
different view but don't know how to be constructive and not be rude.

Like Don was the same? My golden rule is give unto those as they do
unto you. Most of those that have a problem with me, those problems
started long ago, and I'm not gonna to show even a modicum of respect
for them.

You telling people off because you disagree with a point of view is
wrong.

Please show everyone where I tell some one off just because of their
opinion. Usually I tell those off that don't express any real opinion,
but just attack me personally. Don would be a prime example of that.
Most of the "telling off" I do, there is a past history over years, that
those that have subscribed to this list more recently have little
knowledge of.

Those that read me over time should see that I try, though I not always
right, to "tell off" people that are deserving of it.

I do agree the activation should stay out of the picture. Microsoft
could fix this problem real easy but refused to do so. Selling all
the retail operating systems(Full version 98se, me, xp e.t.c.)
directly for $50.00 without any support and no activation required


This way Microsoft would know who has a legal version of windows.
(They would make more money in the long run). I heard on tv it only
cost under $1.00 to make a cd (Also, take money order as well).

This way everyone would have a legal version.

PA is not about money really, it's about control.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Don Burnette]

http://www.google.com/groups?q=g:th...-8&[email protected]

I can prove it, if you are willing. Can you disprove it?

Nope, all you can do is talk about BLACK Helicopters, and WHITE
coats. I wonder why that is? Black & White. It because you live in
a monochrome world, where there are only absolutes. Everything is
either Black or White to you.

I live in a full spectrum of color's world. I'm willing to see all
sides of any situation. Too bad you couldn't say the same thing with
a straight face.

Ummm, excuse me , why would i need to disprove an accuasation yYOU made???
I CHOOSE to believe it is nothing but complete and utter crap, just like you
and your scum-kurtrail website.
I loath and despise pirates and those that would encourage it.

 

[Don Burnette]

Those that do, aren't those whose opinions would matter to me.


Like Don was the same? My golden rule is give unto those as they do
unto you. Most of those that have a problem with me, those problems
started long ago, and I'm not gonna to show even a modicum of respect
for them.


Please show everyone where I tell some one off just because of their
opinion. Usually I tell those off that don't express any real
opinion, but just attack me personally. Don would be a prime example
of that. Most of the "telling off" I do, there is a past history over
years, that those that have subscribed to this list more recently
have little knowledge of.

Those that read me over time should see that I try, though I not
always right, to "tell off" people that are deserving of it.


PA is not about money really, it's about control.

Your mental.
You do nothing but make a fool of yourself. You resort to name calling and
degradation - like I am giving you an example of now. Your own medicine.
Your pathetic.

Don't like XP? Don't want to support MS?
Then get the heck out of here, take MS off your system ( if you even know
how ), nstall some other software, and cry where maybe someone might comfort
you a little.

Your obviously on a path to self destruction.
Bye now.

 

[kurttrail]

Your mental.
You do nothing but make a fool of yourself. You resort to name
calling and degradation - like I am giving you an example of now.
Your own medicine. Your pathetic.

Don't like XP? Don't want to support MS?
Then get the heck out of here, take MS off your system ( if you even
know how ), nstall some other software, and cry where maybe someone
might comfort you a little.

Your obviously on a path to self destruction.
Bye now.

The only one who self-destructed around here is you! Thanks for all your
help!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"