P
*ProteanThread*
most are low in membership with little or no activity. why duplicate "
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware " ? granted, i
created a yahoo group for freeware file sharing only because google
groups doesn't do binary (and no yahoo account is necessary) but ...
oh, well we won't go there.
google's nice but lately i'm finding out old stand bys like yahoo or
msn are just as good in most cases and in some cases better than
google. even alta vista has a better image search than google. if
yahoo were to include usenet groups, then what ? google certainly
can't stay atop forever, can it ? Where is the next internet dragon to
slay ?
unless somone can point me to a better service, i dare say that Yahoo
Groups outshines Google Groups (not in terms of usenet but in terms of
creating your own group) by a thousand to 1 although google is good in
other areas where yahoo isn't.
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware " ? granted, i
created a yahoo group for freeware file sharing only because google
groups doesn't do binary (and no yahoo account is necessary) but ...
oh, well we won't go there.
google's nice but lately i'm finding out old stand bys like yahoo or
msn are just as good in most cases and in some cases better than
google. even alta vista has a better image search than google. if
yahoo were to include usenet groups, then what ? google certainly
can't stay atop forever, can it ? Where is the next internet dragon to
slay ?
unless somone can point me to a better service, i dare say that Yahoo
Groups outshines Google Groups (not in terms of usenet but in terms of
creating your own group) by a thousand to 1 although google is good in
other areas where yahoo isn't.