S
Splibbilla
a few times a year, i've cleansed my bookmarks. this time, about 17k knocked out of 680k. No way to know what % needed
decrufting and what % were remaining from previous cleansings.
-------------
some samples of google cruft found in bookmarks:
the first of those two 'hybrid crufts' look to be the result of my editing by mass search&replace
i use &btn as a stubphrase to find variations
&sa=Google+Search
looks to be a mangling of &sa=N or &sa=G or other variation plus &btnG=Google+Search
so i must have clicked 'replace' at the wrong moment, once or twice
the second hybrid cruft is an odd mix of encoded and not encoded. hemi-encoded url-cruft?
&tab=wg
-------------
the url-encoded (?) cruft is harder for human {1} eyeballs to see.
%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN%26tab%3Dwg
hl%3Den%26lr%3Dlang_en%26ie%3DISO-8859-1%26
breakout a few:
%26sa%3DN &sa=N
%26sa%3DG &sa=G
%26hl%3Den &hl=en
%26lr%3D &lr=
not that we should begin a list of standard url-cruft craft, nonono
also, a (decrufted) link to the topic on the intergoogle:
http://www.google.com/search?q=url-cruft
decrufting and what % were remaining from previous cleansings.
-------------
some samples of google cruft found in bookmarks:
the first of those two 'hybrid crufts' look to be the result of my editing by mass search&replace
i use &btn as a stubphrase to find variations
&sa=Google+Search
looks to be a mangling of &sa=N or &sa=G or other variation plus &btnG=Google+Search
so i must have clicked 'replace' at the wrong moment, once or twice
the second hybrid cruft is an odd mix of encoded and not encoded. hemi-encoded url-cruft?
&tab=wg
-------------
the url-encoded (?) cruft is harder for human {1} eyeballs to see.
%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN%26tab%3Dwg
hl%3Den%26lr%3Dlang_en%26ie%3DISO-8859-1%26
breakout a few:
%26sa%3DN &sa=N
%26sa%3DG &sa=G
%26hl%3Den &hl=en
%26lr%3D &lr=
not that we should begin a list of standard url-cruft craft, nonono
also, a (decrufted) link to the topic on the intergoogle:
http://www.google.com/search?q=url-cruft