Windows.XP Repairing

[travolta005]

Windows XP tips and tricks. .Learn how to bypass very common
windows.problems, speed up your system and make it more reliable
with useful tips and tricks.

http://windowsxpsp2pro.blogspot.com

 

[Vanguard]

travolta005 wrote in message

Windows XP tips and tricks. .Learn how to bypass very common
windows.problems, speed up your system and make it more reliable
with useful tips and tricks.

http://windowsxpsp2pro. blogspot. com

No one needs to visit a spam site to figure out how to fix problems.

blogspot & gmail = havens for spammers

 

[Scott Alfter]

travolta005 wrote in message


No one needs to visit a spam site to figure out how to fix problems.

No one needs to see you repost spam, either. Trim your quotes, and either
delete spamvertised URLs or edit them (as above) to make them useless.

_/_
/ v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail)
(IIGS( http://alfter.us/ Top-posting!
\_^_/ rm -rf /bin/laden >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?

 

[Trevor Best]

No one needs to see you repost spam, either. Trim your quotes, and either
delete spamvertised URLs or edit them (as above) to make them useless.

He did munge the URL, it is useless. BTW while you're spouting off
netiquette in both your message and your sig, you should use a sig sep

 

[~misfit~]

He did munge the URL, it is useless. BTW while you're spouting off
netiquette in both your message and your sig, you should use a sig sep

Exactly! A sig delineator is a must for anyone who's going to talk
use-netiquette.

 

[Johannes Andersen]

No one needs to see you repost spam, either. Trim your quotes, and either
delete spamvertised URLs or edit them (as above) to make them useless.

Even when you remove any references to the spam, you're still likely to be
labeled an idiot by our friend Mike Tomlinson. Best to support the spammers
and let them get away with it.

 

[kony]

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:51:53 +0100, Johannes Andersen

Best to support the spammers
and let them get away with it.

What a ridiculous argument.

 

[johannes]

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:51:53 +0100, Johannes Andersen



What a ridiculous argument.

Read again. It was a sarcastic remark in the context of my post.

 

[Arno Wagner]

Read again. It was a sarcastic remark in the context of my post.

Sarcasm is dead. Nobody ever understood it anyways...

Arno

 

[Folkert Rienstra]

Sarcasm is dead. Nobody ever understood it anyways...

Maybe we should call you Nobody from now on then, babblebot.

 

[Trevor Best]

Sarcasm is dead. Nobody ever understood it anyways...

Oh, you're obviously from the uk group this was posted to then.

(the above was sarcasm, starting to get it now are we? )

 

[Arno Wagner]

Oh, you're obviously from the uk group this was posted to then.

(the above was sarcasm, starting to get it now are we? )

(Hint: My posting also was sarcasm... ;-)

Armp

 

[Folkert Rienstra]

(Hint: My posting also was sarcasm... ;-)

Right, so you're posting from the grave, babblebot.
That explains your round the clock posting. No sleep for the dead.

Armp

What?

 

[chrisv]

What?

Type "Arno" with your right hand one key to the right of where it
should be. 8)