Windows Genuine Advantage Notifications application

  • Thread starter Thread starter antioch
  • Start date Start date
A

antioch

Hi Kurttrail
Why do they keep sending this for update - it must be the fourth or fifth
time in the last four months - the same thing every time.
Well I cant see the difference - perhaps someone can explain.
No diatribe please Kurt - simple tech terms only - I know what you are like
when you get on one of your band-waggons ;-) ;-)
Antioch
 
kurttrail said:
MS has the absolute gall to release this totally unnecessary crap as a
critical update!

Everyone, do yourself a favor, NEVER trust Microsoft to act in YOUR best
interest. This is absolute proof that MS only acts in its own interest!

A high priority update! Who do they really think they are fooling?

Wow, the third WGA. I wonder if one can just not download it and
download the other high priority update.

Alias
 
I knew I should not have posted - tech reasons only I requested. I think
you are going off on one of your......
Time for bed - I cant take it.
Antioch
 
kurttrail said:
Not if you have Automatic Updates enabled.

Never have that on. I wonder if I need the other one as it seems it's a
fix for an update I downloaded and with which I have had no problems.

Alias
 
MS has the absolute gall to release this totally unnecessary crap as a
critical update!

Everyone, do yourself a favor, NEVER trust Microsoft to act in YOUR best
interest. This is absolute proof that MS only acts in its own interest!

A high priority update! Who do they really think they are fooling?

--
Peace!
Kurt Kirsch
Self-anointed Moderator
http://microscum.com
"It'll soon shake your Windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'."
 
Comments below.


kurttrail said:
ROFL! Actually, MS's copy-protection has very little to do with
anything technical in fighting REAL piracy. Just the imagined piracy of
people "fairly using" their software. And instead lobbying to change
"fair use" in law, MS is using their copy-protection to FUD people into
thinking that MS has the right to control people's "fair use" rights,
which of course, MS really doesn't.

--
Peace!
Kurt Kirsch
Self-anointed A**hole
My web site doesn't even matter

Microsoft owns Windows and can do whatever they like - untill a court of law
tells them that they can't.

Isn't that right A**hole. You are always the one spouting off about law.

Suggest you go over to the dark side and play with Apple or Linux. But hey -
you are too stupid to learn these new systems. You even said so yourself in
the past.

You are about the most insecure, inconsiderate, lonely looser that I have
ever seen post in any newsgroup. Grow up. Take your thumb out of your A** and
place it in your mouth where it should be. You need oral gratification that
only sucking can give you.
 
kurttrail said:
Probably not. When I went to Microsoft Update, it didn't even offer me
Version 2. Though on my testing partition, I did install the new
version, as I had uninstall the first.

It offered it to me.

Alias
 
antioch said:
Hi Kurttrail
Why do they keep sending this for update - it must be the fourth or
fifth time in the last four months - the same thing every time.
Well I cant see the difference - perhaps someone can explain.
No diatribe please Kurt - simple tech terms only - I know what you
are like when you get on one of your band-waggons ;-) ;-)

LOL! MS is trying to condition its customers to do anything they want
them to do. Trying to break you to their will through sheer mindless
repetition.

It is as simple as that. Its all about control.

--
Peace!
Kurt Kirsch
Self-anointed Moderator
http://microscum.com
"It'll soon shake your Windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'."
 
Alias said:
Wow, the third WGA. I wonder if one can just not download it and
download the other high priority update.

Alias

Not if you have Automatic Updates enabled.

--
Peace!
Kurt Kirsch
Self-anointed Moderator
http://microscum.com
"It'll soon shake your Windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'."
 
In Mugsy Nabru had this to say:

Interspersed:
Microsoft owns Windows and can do whatever they like - untill a court
of law tells them that they can't.

That is 100% accurate unless they are in violation of the law in which case
the law has already spoken and in this case they haven't. Microsoft vs.
Kurtail in a sub-committee hearing. Should be entertaining.
Isn't that right A**hole. You are always the one spouting off about
law.

He makes valid points - idealistic and assuming that he has some sort of
right to demand what Microsoft can and can't do but he backs them up with
evidence (biased but that's the name of the game) to support his ideals.
Suggest you go over to the dark side and play with Apple or Linux.
But hey - you are too stupid to learn these new systems. You even
said so yourself in the past.

Oh my. Not at all. He's not even remotely stupid. He probably won't admit it
in public but he's even got a heart. You should read more of his posts.
While I don't agree with him at all I do see that Microsoft - the owners of
the servers here - has allowed him to remain while they have it in their
power to ban him easily enough. To call Kurtail stupid is erroneous. Biased,
assuming (spelling), and egotistical? Those would be accurate. Stupid is,
however, not a very accurate description.
You are about the most insecure, inconsiderate, lonely looser that I
have ever seen post in any newsgroup. Grow up. Take your thumb out of
your A** and place it in your mouth where it should be. You need oral
gratification that only sucking can give you.

I've not had the chance to give a good analytical view of his psychological
make-up nor motives. I don't agree with either the tactics nor 90% of what
he says but I don't think that gives me the right to judge him nor his views
and so long as the owners of the server allow his presence (and I've even
seen him help here and there - so get off him, he's our troll!) I don't
think that resorting to petty name calling and partially obscured
vulgarities will benefit you any.

So, finally, you should understand - from the above - that I don't agree
with the vast majority of what he has to say but I respect his freedom to
voice his opinions so long as they're done with some effort of self
restraint. (Something he seems to have taken into account as of late.) He is
entitled to his views as much as Microsoft is entitled to do what ever they
want with their operating system and to make any business choices they want.
The irony that I see is that people will sit here and, when you get to the
root of it, say the basic "you haven't any right to tell them what to do"
message that's been repeated to him a million times. (How many times is it
now anyhow?) In reality, at the same time, they're telling him that he can't
have a point of view while, at the same time - and you can trust he's been
reviewed enough - the people who are in charge of the whole server (as in
they OWN it and allow YOU to access it at great expense to them) accept
*most* of what he posts.

Ah, it reminds me of the gliberals who shout about freedoms of choice and
then throw paint on people who wear fur. Anyhow, don't feed the trolls and
quite frankly we're acclimated to him and Kurtrail's our troll.

--
Galen - MS MVP - Windows (Shell/User & IE)
http://dts-l.org/
http://kgiii.info/

"At present I am, as you know, fairly busy, but I propose to devote my
declining years to the composition of a textbook which shall focus the
whole art of detection into one volume." - Sherlock Holmes
 
antioch said:
I knew I should not have posted - tech reasons only I requested. I
think you are going off on one of your......
Time for bed - I cant take it.
Antioch

ROFL! Actually, MS's copy-protection has very little to do with
anything technical in fighting REAL piracy. Just the imagined piracy of
people "fairly using" their software. And instead lobbying to change
"fair use" in law, MS is using their copy-protection to FUD people into
thinking that MS has the right to control people's "fair use" rights,
which of course, MS really doesn't.

--
Peace!
Kurt Kirsch
Self-anointed Moderator
http://microscum.com
"It'll soon shake your Windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'."
 
I can understand the fight to piracy is important but I also feel, in
similar but not exact ways, about how annoying it is for MS to put so many
checks on re-installing its OS and applications or updates.

But for Genuine Advantage checkup, it usually occurs when I downloaded extra
utilities such as Syntoy. Well, I don't like it to check up my system as
well, but I think it's ok since I am downloading the extra things not
belonging to the original OS, so it's a trade off.

In any case, I do think MS put too many "questionable" practice on regular
users using legitimate software and it sometime bothers me as well.

The underlying issue still is - we don't have any closer substitute and
please don't mention Linux and Apple - at least for now.

Blame this to all incompetent executives in so-called tech industry.
 
The old one never worked for me. Whenever, I logged in as a limited
User, I always had to verify my software manually before any downloads
were allowed. I haven't tried the new one yet.

I like to download all updates before installing them as I keep a CD of
all updates for future use until Service Pack 3 comes out.

hth
 
Alias said:
Never have that on. I wonder if I need the other one as it seems it's
a fix for an update I downloaded and with which I have had no
problems.

Probably not. When I went to Microsoft Update, it didn't even offer me
Version 2. Though on my testing partition, I did install the new
version, as I had uninstall the first.

--
Peace!
Kurt Kirsch
Self-anointed Moderator
http://microscum.com
"It'll soon shake your Windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'."
 
The underlying issue still is - we don't have any closer substitute and
please don't mention Linux and Apple - at least for now.


In fact Apple users are thinking of Installing XP on their hardware!!!
Did you hear that Apple has released a tool to facilitate this to run in
dual mode!! God knows why!!
 
And this one is beta--read the EULA <G>

--
Customers in the U.S. and Canada can receive technical support from
Microsoft Product Support Services at 1-866-PCSAFETY. There is no charge for
support calls that are associated with security updates
Larry Samuels Associate Expert
MS-MVP (2001-2005)
Unofficial FAQ for Windows Server 2003 at
http://pelos.us/SERVER.htm
Expert Zone-
 
Mugsy said:
Comments below.




Microsoft owns Windows and can do whatever they like - untill a court
of law tells them that they can't.

LOL! Just because I can stir up a hornets nest doesn't mean I should.
Isn't that right A**hole.

ROFL! Well it is right that I'm an A**hole. ;-)
You are always the one spouting off about
law.

The law also doesn't give MS the right to interfere with my "fair use,"
so MS can just go bugger off, if they don't like it.
Suggest you go over to the dark side and play with Apple or Linux.

I do use Linux on another machine. But as for the "dark side," it is MS
that would be the evil empire.

http://homepage.univie.ac.at/horst.prillinger/evil-empire/
But hey - you are too stupid to learn these new systems.

Never said I was too stupid to learn how to use a Mac. Not willing to
trash my investment in my main computer, my software, or my computer
education to buy a Mac. And Linux won't run on my main machine, but I
do have it running on a test machine.
You even
said so yourself in the past.

Quote me. I think you'll find I didn't say I was "too stupid."
You are about the most insecure, inconsiderate, lonely looser that I
have ever seen post in any newsgroup.

Ah. You must refuse to look in the mirror!

Like you? No thanks. I'd rather be immature, than to be like you.
Take your thumb out of
your A** and place it in your mouth where it should be.

Never sucked my thumb. But I did breast feed for longer than most.
You need oral
gratification that only sucking can give you.

LOL! I guess I could always go back to smoking!

Which reminds me! Last month was the one year anniversary of me
stopping smoking, so I celebrated by drinking Black & Tans, and smoking
three cigarettes! Boy did they taste great!

--
Peace!
Kurt Kirsch
Self-anointed Moderator
http://microscum.com
"It'll soon shake your Windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'."
 
This one will pop up a message if it finds a bootleg copy advising the user
that the copy is not legit and telling the user how to acquire a legitimate
copy (supposedly)

--
Customers in the U.S. and Canada can receive technical support from
Microsoft Product Support Services at 1-866-PCSAFETY. There is no charge for
support calls that are associated with security updates
Larry Samuels Associate Expert
MS-MVP (2001-2005)
Unofficial FAQ for Windows Server 2003 at
http://pelos.us/SERVER.htm
Expert Zone-
 
I suppose they didn't state the cataclysm to come if this critical, high
priority update is not installed??? Did they??? There are too many Win98,
Win98SE, WinME, Win2K - SP1,2,3,4 + roll ups, WinXP - SP1,2 that haven't
been critical updated with no problems occurring in terms of security.

I wonder if this will be an ongoing saga with Pista as well? Actually, no I
don't.

- Winux P

: MS has the absolute gall to release this totally unnecessary crap as a
: critical update!
:
: Everyone, do yourself a favor, NEVER trust Microsoft to act in YOUR best
: interest. This is absolute proof that MS only acts in its own interest!
:
: A high priority update! Who do they really think they are fooling?
:
: --
: Peace!
: Kurt Kirsch
: Self-anointed Moderator
: http://microscum.com
: "It'll soon shake your Windows
: And rattle your walls
: For the times they are a-changin'."
:
:
 
Winux said:
I suppose they didn't state the cataclysm to come if this critical, high
priority update is not installed??? Did they??? There are too many Win98,
Win98SE, WinME, Win2K - SP1,2,3,4 + roll ups, WinXP - SP1,2 that haven't
been critical updated with no problems occurring in terms of security.

I wonder if this will be an ongoing saga with Pista as well? Actually, no I
don't.

- Winux P

What dire consequences are you expecting? If by installing
this important update, a majority of the Windows XP systems
are declared to be invalid, should we be expecting Microsoft
to go belly up? You know, Microsoft had a disaster with the
security update MS06-015; anybody want to take bets that the
programmers might also goof up with this one?
 
Back
Top