Why shouldn't MS Fingerprint reader not be used to protect sensitive data?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anonymous
  • Start date Start date
The do-bads will cut off your finger to gain access.


Can't speak to the MS device (this is the first I've heard of it)
but a fingerprint reader made by another company claims to address
this problem. I didn't have the stomach to ask for details.

I don't know how a fingerprint reader could block replay of data.

Take a look at this;

http://www.rsasecurity.com/node.asp?id=1157
 
Al said:
Can't speak to the MS device (this is the first I've heard of it)
but a fingerprint reader made by another company claims to address
this problem. I didn't have the stomach to ask for details.

I don't know how a fingerprint reader could block replay of data.

Take a look at this;

http://www.rsasecurity.com/node.asp?id=1157
The "cold finger" problem is easily circumvented with an infra red source, see light bulb, halogen or otherwise
 
The main part of identity is a mind. The one who remembers things and makes
decisions. Even a live finger doesn't constitute an identity.
 
ATM machines in South Africa use fingerprints instead of pin numbers.
When the business of cutting off fingers first occured (yes, it did
happen a few times), the readers were modified to only work with a
"live" finger.

Really, in any normal application, this is a non-issue. If someone is
holding a gun to your head, you are likely to tell them your password.
Most of us, however, are not trying to deal with a "threat environment"
that even encompasses lethal force and physical violence.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top