N
Norbert Pürringer
Hello,
I would like to explain, why COM in-process and COM local server are
not needed in .NET anymore. Of course there are several .NET
techniques how to solve remote communication as successor of .COM
remote servers (.NET remoting, WCF communication and web services).
But the successor of COM in-process and COM local server is the simple
assembly, isn't it? The manifest of the assembly can be seen as
successor of the COM type library. There you get all the informations
about all types defined in the assembly.
Am I right?
Thank you,
Norbert
I would like to explain, why COM in-process and COM local server are
not needed in .NET anymore. Of course there are several .NET
techniques how to solve remote communication as successor of .COM
remote servers (.NET remoting, WCF communication and web services).
But the successor of COM in-process and COM local server is the simple
assembly, isn't it? The manifest of the assembly can be seen as
successor of the COM type library. There you get all the informations
about all types defined in the assembly.
Am I right?
Thank you,
Norbert