when to use many-many relationships or different data bases

R

RAK

I am trying to create an operational database. We hire temporary staff
through several different employment agencies to complete work on projects
for various clients. The term of employment is linked to individual projects
which are time limited and include different assignments within each project.
Many of the people we use have worked on many different projects at many
different times including several years. I started out thinking I needed 5
different tables and needed to use a many-many relationship. Here are the 5
tables I identified with some types of data:
Employee_Personal (usual type data)
Employment_History (includes Dates hired, Projects assigned at different
times, employment title per project, performance records; rehire status)
Agency (related to each employee, # provided for each project; performance
of employees provided)
Project (Clients, Dates, subjects, teams needed, staff needed)
Accounting [(Hours to complete project-administration pre training,
training, execution and administrative client reporting); (staff cost factors
computed for number of hours *title pay); (computer cost and needs per
project); space cost and needs per project)]

I started looking at the tables to try to see what relationships I needed
and if I needed junction tables. I didn’t know how to handle the different
dates of employment and different assignments for each employee and wondered
if I could use multi-valued fields or value lists for this data. Then I
started doubting if I was going in the right direction and thought I’d see if
I could get any help.
 
F

Fred

Of course, this needs to be dealt with as a database design issue, not just
the linkage aspect.

You'll need to decide what the most "granular" level thing you need to
database regarding employment for a project. Then instances of that shoudl
probably be a table. Most likely this instances of continuous employment of
one person for one project.
 
J

Jeff Boyce

The way you handle many-many relationships in Access is via a junction
table.

It sounds like you are saying that:

One Project can have many Tasks.
One Task can be assigned to (any-of-many) Staff
One Staff can be working for (any-of-many) Agencies

Sounds like:
[Project] table - info specific to a project
[Task] table - Task-specific info, including ProjectID (to which Project
does this task belong?)
[Agency] table - list of agencies and agency-specific info
[Staff] table - AKA [Employee] table
[AgencyStaff] table - a junction table, showing who worked for which
agency during which time frame
[TaskAssignment] table - a junction table, showing which AgencyStaffID
worked on which TaskID

But you're closer to your situation. Does the above make sense?

Regards

Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Access MVP

--
Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned
in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein
does not constitute endorsement thereof.

Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no
guarantee as to suitability.

You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer
possible/necessary.

RAK said:
I am trying to create an operational database. We hire temporary staff
through several different employment agencies to complete work on projects
for various clients. The term of employment is linked to individual
projects
which are time limited and include different assignments within each
project.
Many of the people we use have worked on many different projects at many
different times including several years. I started out thinking I needed 5
different tables and needed to use a many-many relationship. Here are the
5
tables I identified with some types of data:
Employee_Personal (usual type data)
Employment_History (includes Dates hired, Projects assigned at different
times, employment title per project, performance records; rehire status)
Agency (related to each employee, # provided for each project; performance
of employees provided)
Project (Clients, Dates, subjects, teams needed, staff needed)
Accounting [(Hours to complete project-administration pre training,
training, execution and administrative client reporting); (staff cost
factors
computed for number of hours *title pay); (computer cost and needs per
project); space cost and needs per project)]

I started looking at the tables to try to see what relationships I needed
and if I needed junction tables. I didn't know how to handle the different
dates of employment and different assignments for each employee and
wondered
if I could use multi-valued fields or value lists for this data. Then I
started doubting if I was going in the right direction and thought I'd see
if
I could get any help.
 
D

Dorian

Only you can determine how things relate to eachh other since you know your
business rules.
I can envisage an employee working for multiple agencies possible more than
one simultaneously. Whether this could happen during a project you would know.
An employee might work on more than one project simultaneously possibly for
different agencies.
Actually it seems like you are handling several distinct functions in one
database. You have an Employee system, a Project system and an Accounting
system. Will these all be used by the same people. Possibly you may need
multiple front-ends for different functions.
Of course, since I dont know your systems this may all be inaccurate.
-- Dorian
"Give someone a fish and they eat for a day; teach someone to fish and they
eat for a lifetime".
 
R

rolaaus

One question that I have, after reading your post is when you mention "how to
handle the different dates of employment and different assignments for each
employee".

Here's my question. Does your system *need* to link the dates of a project
with the dates of an employees start/end date? In other words, let's say for
examples sake, that you have an employee that started working for your
company on Feb 1, 2008. He was assigned to a project that happened to have
started on Jan 1, 2008. You didn't mentioned tasks, but another person did,
so there's another factor.

What if you have one employee that starts a task/project and isn't able to
complete it for whatever reason (fired, quits, it doesn't matter why) and you
have to hire someone new.

This is why I ask the question, does your system need to keep track of
employees start/end dates, and !directly link! them to other dates (projects
or tasks) in the system?

Usually project tracking systems are really going to care. But if this
system is going to be used by the "bean counters" (accountants and/or
executive level - VP, etc) then it probably will matter, a lot!

RAK said:
I am trying to create an operational database. We hire temporary staff
through several different employment agencies to complete work on projects
for various clients. The term of employment is linked to individual projects
which are time limited and include different assignments within each project.
Many of the people we use have worked on many different projects at many
different times including several years. I started out thinking I needed 5
different tables and needed to use a many-many relationship. Here are the 5
tables I identified with some types of data:
Employee_Personal (usual type data)
Employment_History (includes Dates hired, Projects assigned at different
times, employment title per project, performance records; rehire status)
Agency (related to each employee, # provided for each project; performance
of employees provided)
Project (Clients, Dates, subjects, teams needed, staff needed)
Accounting [(Hours to complete project-administration pre training,
training, execution and administrative client reporting); (staff cost factors
computed for number of hours *title pay); (computer cost and needs per
project); space cost and needs per project)]

I started looking at the tables to try to see what relationships I needed
and if I needed junction tables. I didn’t know how to handle the different
dates of employment and different assignments for each employee and wondered
if I could use multi-valued fields or value lists for this data. Then I
started doubting if I was going in the right direction and thought I’d see if
I could get any help.
 
R

RAK

Dorian said:
Only you can determine how things relate to eachh other since you know your
business rules.
I can envisage an employee working for multiple agencies possible more than
one simultaneously. Whether this could happen during a project you would know.
An employee might work on more than one project simultaneously possibly for
different agencies.
Actually it seems like you are handling several distinct functions in one
database. You have an Employee system, a Project system and an Accounting
system. Will these all be used by the same people. Possibly you may need
multiple front-ends for different functions.
Of course, since I dont know your systems this may all be inaccurate.
-- Dorian
"Give someone a fish and they eat for a day; teach someone to fish and they
eat for a lifetime".


RAK said:
I am trying to create an operational database. We hire temporary staff
through several different employment agencies to complete work on projects
for various clients. The term of employment is linked to individual projects
which are time limited and include different assignments within each project.
Many of the people we use have worked on many different projects at many
different times including several years. I started out thinking I needed 5
different tables and needed to use a many-many relationship. Here are the 5
tables I identified with some types of data:
Employee_Personal (usual type data)
Employment_History (includes Dates hired, Projects assigned at different
times, employment title per project, performance records; rehire status)
Agency (related to each employee, # provided for each project; performance
of employees provided)
Project (Clients, Dates, subjects, teams needed, staff needed)
Accounting [(Hours to complete project-administration pre training,
training, execution and administrative client reporting); (staff cost factors
computed for number of hours *title pay); (computer cost and needs per
project); space cost and needs per project)]

I started looking at the tables to try to see what relationships I needed
and if I needed junction tables. I didn’t know how to handle the different
dates of employment and different assignments for each employee and wondered
if I could use multi-valued fields or value lists for this data. Then I
started doubting if I was going in the right direction and thought I’d see if
I could get any help.

First to clarify: staff can only be hired thru one agency during a current
year but they can work on many different projects
You said "Possibly you may need
 
R

RAK

Jeff Boyce said:
The way you handle many-many relationships in Access is via a junction
table.

It sounds like you are saying that:

One Project can have many Tasks.
One Task can be assigned to (any-of-many) Staff
One Staff can be working for (any-of-many) Agencies

Sounds like:
[Project] table - info specific to a project
[Task] table - Task-specific info, including ProjectID (to which Project
does this task belong?)
[Agency] table - list of agencies and agency-specific info
[Staff] table - AKA [Employee] table
[AgencyStaff] table - a junction table, showing who worked for which
agency during which time frame
[TaskAssignment] table - a junction table, showing which AgencyStaffID
worked on which TaskID

But you're closer to your situation. Does the above make sense?

Regards

Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Access MVP

--
Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned
in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein
does not constitute endorsement thereof.

Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no
guarantee as to suitability.

You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer
possible/necessary.

RAK said:
I am trying to create an operational database. We hire temporary staff
through several different employment agencies to complete work on projects
for various clients. The term of employment is linked to individual
projects
which are time limited and include different assignments within each
project.
Many of the people we use have worked on many different projects at many
different times including several years. I started out thinking I needed 5
different tables and needed to use a many-many relationship. Here are the
5
tables I identified with some types of data:
Employee_Personal (usual type data)
Employment_History (includes Dates hired, Projects assigned at different
times, employment title per project, performance records; rehire status)
Agency (related to each employee, # provided for each project; performance
of employees provided)
Project (Clients, Dates, subjects, teams needed, staff needed)
Accounting [(Hours to complete project-administration pre training,
training, execution and administrative client reporting); (staff cost
factors
computed for number of hours *title pay); (computer cost and needs per
project); space cost and needs per project)]

I started looking at the tables to try to see what relationships I needed
and if I needed junction tables. I didn't know how to handle the different
dates of employment and different assignments for each employee and
wondered
if I could use multi-valued fields or value lists for this data. Then I
started doubting if I was going in the right direction and thought I'd see
if
I could get any help.


.
Yes, thanks. This is the direction I was heading but got a little lost when I started working on relational links and defining the foreign keys. The AgencyStaff junction table appears to take care of the relationships for staff & agency. But I’m not sure what relationships are defined in the TaskAssignment junction table. Can I impose upon you for a little more detail and perhaps a light will shine for me on how to handle the accounting data.
To clarify your conclusions:
One Project can have many Tasks. Yes
 
R

RAK

rolaaus said:
One question that I have, after reading your post is when you mention "how to
handle the different dates of employment and different assignments for each
employee".

Here's my question. Does your system *need* to link the dates of a project
with the dates of an employees start/end date? In other words, let's say for
examples sake, that you have an employee that started working for your
company on Feb 1, 2008. He was assigned to a project that happened to have
started on Jan 1, 2008. You didn't mentioned tasks, but another person did,
so there's another factor.

What if you have one employee that starts a task/project and isn't able to
complete it for whatever reason (fired, quits, it doesn't matter why) and you
have to hire someone new.

This is why I ask the question, does your system need to keep track of
employees start/end dates, and !directly link! them to other dates (projects
or tasks) in the system?

Usually project tracking systems are really going to care. But if this
system is going to be used by the "bean counters" (accountants and/or
executive level - VP, etc) then it probably will matter, a lot!

RAK said:
I am trying to create an operational database. We hire temporary staff
through several different employment agencies to complete work on projects
for various clients. The term of employment is linked to individual projects
which are time limited and include different assignments within each project.
Many of the people we use have worked on many different projects at many
different times including several years. I started out thinking I needed 5
different tables and needed to use a many-many relationship. Here are the 5
tables I identified with some types of data:
Employee_Personal (usual type data)
Employment_History (includes Dates hired, Projects assigned at different
times, employment title per project, performance records; rehire status)
Agency (related to each employee, # provided for each project; performance
of employees provided)
Project (Clients, Dates, subjects, teams needed, staff needed)
Accounting [(Hours to complete project-administration pre training,
training, execution and administrative client reporting); (staff cost factors
computed for number of hours *title pay); (computer cost and needs per
project); space cost and needs per project)]

I started looking at the tables to try to see what relationships I needed
and if I needed junction tables. I didn’t know how to handle the different
dates of employment and different assignments for each employee and wondered
if I could use multi-valued fields or value lists for this data. Then I
started doubting if I was going in the right direction and thought I’d see if
I could get any help.

in answer to your question:"Does your system *need* to link the dates of a
project
 
J

Jeff Boyce

If you care that John Doe was working for Agency A while working on Project
17, Task 3 in 2008, but was working for Agency B while working on Project
23, Task 11 in 2009, then you'll need to keep track of Staff/Agency
connections.

If you want to see EVERYTHING John Doe ever touched, but don't care who he
was working for at the time, you don't need the Staff/Agency connection.

Regards

Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Access MVP

--
Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned
in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein
does not constitute endorsement thereof.

Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no
guarantee as to suitability.

You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer
possible/necessary.

RAK said:
Jeff Boyce said:
The way you handle many-many relationships in Access is via a junction
table.

It sounds like you are saying that:

One Project can have many Tasks.
One Task can be assigned to (any-of-many) Staff
One Staff can be working for (any-of-many) Agencies

Sounds like:
[Project] table - info specific to a project
[Task] table - Task-specific info, including ProjectID (to which
Project
does this task belong?)
[Agency] table - list of agencies and agency-specific info
[Staff] table - AKA [Employee] table
[AgencyStaff] table - a junction table, showing who worked for which
agency during which time frame
[TaskAssignment] table - a junction table, showing which AgencyStaffID
worked on which TaskID

But you're closer to your situation. Does the above make sense?

Regards

Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Access MVP

--
Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned
in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein
does not constitute endorsement thereof.

Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no
guarantee as to suitability.

You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer
possible/necessary.

RAK said:
I am trying to create an operational database. We hire temporary staff
through several different employment agencies to complete work on
projects
for various clients. The term of employment is linked to individual
projects
which are time limited and include different assignments within each
project.
Many of the people we use have worked on many different projects at
many
different times including several years. I started out thinking I
needed 5
different tables and needed to use a many-many relationship. Here are
the
5
tables I identified with some types of data:
Employee_Personal (usual type data)
Employment_History (includes Dates hired, Projects assigned at
different
times, employment title per project, performance records; rehire
status)
Agency (related to each employee, # provided for each project;
performance
of employees provided)
Project (Clients, Dates, subjects, teams needed, staff needed)
Accounting [(Hours to complete project-administration pre training,
training, execution and administrative client reporting); (staff cost
factors
computed for number of hours *title pay); (computer cost and needs per
project); space cost and needs per project)]

I started looking at the tables to try to see what relationships I
needed
and if I needed junction tables. I didn't know how to handle the
different
dates of employment and different assignments for each employee and
wondered
if I could use multi-valued fields or value lists for this data. Then
I
started doubting if I was going in the right direction and thought I'd
see
if
I could get any help.


.
Yes, thanks. This is the direction I was heading but got a little lost
when I started working on relational links and defining the foreign keys.
The AgencyStaff junction table appears to take care of the relationships
for staff & agency. But I'm not sure what relationships are defined in
the TaskAssignment junction table. Can I impose upon you for a little
more detail and perhaps a light will shine for me on how to handle the
accounting data.
To clarify your conclusions:
One Project can have many Tasks. Yes
One Task can be assigned to (any-of-many) Staff Yes
One Staff can be working for (any-of-many) Agencies No, not in same
year
 
R

RAK

To clarify your conclusions:
One Project can have many Tasks. Yes
One Task can be assigned to (any-of-many) Staff Yes
One Staff can be working for (any-of-many) Agencies No, not in same year
Yes, thanks. This is the direction I was heading but got a little lost when
I started working on relational links and defining the foreign keys. The
AgencyStaff junction table appears to take care of the relationships for
staff & agency. But I’m not sure what relationships are defined in the
TaskAssignment junction table. Can I impose upon you for a little more detail
and perhaps a light will shine for me on how to handle the accounting data.
For instance if I have
a staff table and an agency table and a junction staff agency table;
a project table and a task table and a junction project task table;
an accounting table and a junction table for project staff;
does it look like I'm on the right path or did I get lost in the forest?
Can a junction table field be from another junction table or would it be
better to define the fields from individual tables.


Jeff Boyce said:
The way you handle many-many relationships in Access is via a junction
table.

It sounds like you are saying that:

One Project can have many Tasks.
One Task can be assigned to (any-of-many) Staff
One Staff can be working for (any-of-many) Agencies

Sounds like:
[Project] table - info specific to a project
[Task] table - Task-specific info, including ProjectID (to which Project
does this task belong?)
[Agency] table - list of agencies and agency-specific info
[Staff] table - AKA [Employee] table
[AgencyStaff] table - a junction table, showing who worked for which
agency during which time frame
[TaskAssignment] table - a junction table, showing which AgencyStaffID
worked on which TaskID

But you're closer to your situation. Does the above make sense?

Regards

Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Access MVP

--
Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned
in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein
does not constitute endorsement thereof.

Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no
guarantee as to suitability.

You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer
possible/necessary.

RAK said:
I am trying to create an operational database. We hire temporary staff
through several different employment agencies to complete work on projects
for various clients. The term of employment is linked to individual
projects
which are time limited and include different assignments within each
project.
Many of the people we use have worked on many different projects at many
different times including several years. I started out thinking I needed 5
different tables and needed to use a many-many relationship. Here are the
5
tables I identified with some types of data:
Employee_Personal (usual type data)
Employment_History (includes Dates hired, Projects assigned at different
times, employment title per project, performance records; rehire status)
Agency (related to each employee, # provided for each project; performance
of employees provided)
Project (Clients, Dates, subjects, teams needed, staff needed)
Accounting [(Hours to complete project-administration pre training,
training, execution and administrative client reporting); (staff cost
factors
computed for number of hours *title pay); (computer cost and needs per
project); space cost and needs per project)]

I started looking at the tables to try to see what relationships I needed
and if I needed junction tables. I didn't know how to handle the different
dates of employment and different assignments for each employee and
wondered
if I could use multi-valued fields or value lists for this data. Then I
started doubting if I was going in the right direction and thought I'd see
if
I could get any help.


.
 
J

Jeff Boyce

As others have pointed out, the "right" way to normalize is something of an
art, and requires that you know both the domain you're working in and the
output you will need.

A "junction" table is just that, a way to resolve the intersection of two
entities (approx. tables) that have a many-to-many relationship.

Yes, it is possible to have a junction table used to resolve a many-to-many
relationship between tables, each of which might be junction tables
themselves.

Regards

Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Access MVP

--
Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned
in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein
does not constitute endorsement thereof.

Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no
guarantee as to suitability.

You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer
possible/necessary.

RAK said:
To clarify your conclusions:
One Project can have many Tasks. Yes
One Task can be assigned to (any-of-many) Staff Yes
One Staff can be working for (any-of-many) Agencies No, not in same year
Yes, thanks. This is the direction I was heading but got a little lost
when
I started working on relational links and defining the foreign keys. The
AgencyStaff junction table appears to take care of the relationships for
staff & agency. But I'm not sure what relationships are defined in the
TaskAssignment junction table. Can I impose upon you for a little more
detail
and perhaps a light will shine for me on how to handle the accounting
data.
For instance if I have
a staff table and an agency table and a junction staff agency table;
a project table and a task table and a junction project task table;
an accounting table and a junction table for project staff;
does it look like I'm on the right path or did I get lost in the forest?
Can a junction table field be from another junction table or would it be
better to define the fields from individual tables.


Jeff Boyce said:
The way you handle many-many relationships in Access is via a junction
table.

It sounds like you are saying that:

One Project can have many Tasks.
One Task can be assigned to (any-of-many) Staff
One Staff can be working for (any-of-many) Agencies

Sounds like:
[Project] table - info specific to a project
[Task] table - Task-specific info, including ProjectID (to which
Project
does this task belong?)
[Agency] table - list of agencies and agency-specific info
[Staff] table - AKA [Employee] table
[AgencyStaff] table - a junction table, showing who worked for which
agency during which time frame
[TaskAssignment] table - a junction table, showing which AgencyStaffID
worked on which TaskID

But you're closer to your situation. Does the above make sense?

Regards

Jeff Boyce
Microsoft Access MVP

--
Disclaimer: This author may have received products and services mentioned
in this post. Mention and/or description of a product or service herein
does not constitute endorsement thereof.

Any code or pseudocode included in this post is offered "as is", with no
guarantee as to suitability.

You can thank the FTC of the USA for making this disclaimer
possible/necessary.

RAK said:
I am trying to create an operational database. We hire temporary staff
through several different employment agencies to complete work on
projects
for various clients. The term of employment is linked to individual
projects
which are time limited and include different assignments within each
project.
Many of the people we use have worked on many different projects at
many
different times including several years. I started out thinking I
needed 5
different tables and needed to use a many-many relationship. Here are
the
5
tables I identified with some types of data:
Employee_Personal (usual type data)
Employment_History (includes Dates hired, Projects assigned at
different
times, employment title per project, performance records; rehire
status)
Agency (related to each employee, # provided for each project;
performance
of employees provided)
Project (Clients, Dates, subjects, teams needed, staff needed)
Accounting [(Hours to complete project-administration pre training,
training, execution and administrative client reporting); (staff cost
factors
computed for number of hours *title pay); (computer cost and needs per
project); space cost and needs per project)]

I started looking at the tables to try to see what relationships I
needed
and if I needed junction tables. I didn't know how to handle the
different
dates of employment and different assignments for each employee and
wondered
if I could use multi-valued fields or value lists for this data. Then
I
started doubting if I was going in the right direction and thought I'd
see
if
I could get any help.


.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top