Hi Adam,
Vista is a different beast than XP or your other OS. Your motherboard
may of been certified, but it must have slipped through the cracks
somehow for Vista. Thus, the BIOS update for it. Vista runs thing a
bit differently and evidentaly needed that newer BIOS.
Like Jupiter Jones said, "Upgrade Advisor" is just a advisor suggestion
not a definite answer. It is helpful in pointing out some noncompatible
items. You should always check each item at their website to check for
compatibility. They are always changing with updates.
Hope this helps,
Shawn
Sure, but surely you can understand why this upsets people. When you
buy hardware and see it has a "Vista Certified" logo on the packaging
and the same logo on the vendor's web site you except that it DID pass
some kind of testing. I mean come on. We're not talking about anything
very different, what failed was the SATA controller. Very common on
MBs these days. Obviously Microsoft did NOT test it's function as well
as claimed in the certification process or they would have seen it
didn't work correctly.
The same with the Upgrade Advisor. Like I said, I accepted at face
value what it told me... which was one driver while not totally up to
Vista's liking would NOT present any problems with installing Vista,
so I went ahead only to have the install process crash and burn right
when it tried to access the very driver the Upgrade Advisor said
wouldn't cause any problems.
It boils down to WHO should I blame for this? If not Microsoft, who
then? Both instances were under the control of Microsoft. It was their
certification process that failed and it was their Upgrade Advisor
that failed me also.
That's simply what the fanboy crowd (not including you in it) don't
understand. Microsoft has a well deserved reputation of not being up
front with it's customers. They also have a reputation of rushing each
new versions of Windows out the door expecting PAYING CUSTOMERS to
find blunders neither their own software engineers or their hand
picked beta testers did. Since we all know what I just said to be
true, how can anyone argue against not being upset with Microsoft when
they've done things like this for years?