VC++ 2005: private virtual functions

T

Tamas Demjen

Brandon said:
I'm not sure why you're not seeing a warning because there are plenty of
them for this scenario. In any case, the compiler team decided to change the
warnings into errors after Beta 2. When Visual C++ 2005 ships, you'll be
required to put the "new" or "override" keyword there. The code will not
compile otherwise.
Click to expand...

There is indeed a warning that I overlooked. Excellent, thanks, Brandon.
Sorry for the confusion.

Tom
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

any alternatives to (lack of) virtual static functions? 10
ICE in explicit override of interface property getter 5
Same Class, different Types 8
Virtual Override of "Mixed" method in another assembly. 4
a subtle change in behavior... 7
Compile-time check for virtual function existence in derived class 3
private destructor and templates 23
pure virtual functions and /clr 2

Top