Usenet Update

  • Thread starter Thread starter dszady
  • Start date Start date
Steven said:
http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.ht
ml

Rofl, thanks for the reference ;o)
Click to expand...

As you probably know Steven, we have the death penalty over here and you
know Blair and Bush are sleeping together. :)

P.S. I can not wait until the U.S Senate can start grilling the plebians
in the partrician 'Bushies' admin.
P.P.S. Everyone else, sorry about not labeling this [OT]. (sheepish
feeling of crawling into a mossy, Maine icy hole)
 
So would that mean that I can say what I like to you from here in Oz and
you could say nothing back? I haven't seen a similar law here.

Oi, this could be fun :))
 
Rob said:
Nah, all it means is that USAians have to use their real names when
trolling or flaming.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, not. They have to
- use their proper names
- not 'annoy' someone else.

The prison sentence is (up to, equal, at least ?) two years. Everyone
knows that if you want to kick someone into prisons THIS is an excellent
way as 'annoying' as a legal term is wonderfully vague.

In other countries and epochs this term is or was called 'the dignity of
the Republic', 'the honor of the King', 'an insult to the Race and the
Greatness of the Country and the Führer'...

But in these cases you had to say something which your Government or the
Party deemed to be contrary to its interests.

In the US case today, everyone can be 'annoyed'. This largely extends
the social base for intimidation.

You can't be do better in pretending to protect your neighbor and in
reality intimidating.
 
Welllllllll... I've heard it still has to be proven constitutional. There
are huge doubts about that. YMMV. ;)
 
FTR said:
Unfortunately, not. They have to
- use their proper names
- not 'annoy' someone else.
Click to expand...

The exact text is: "without disclosing his identity and with _intent_
to annoy."
Does this mean that as long as you start with saying that you don't
want to annoy anybody you can say almost everything ?
 
So would that mean that I can say what I like to you from here in Oz and
you could say nothing back? I haven't seen a similar law here.
Click to expand...

Probably not. Bush seems to think that he can impose US law anywhere
in the world.
 
This for anyone who even thinks about flaming me. Actually, it really
sucks.

http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-60224
91.html
Click to expand...

"Actually, it really" is just another urban propaganda myth,
the kind you recognize as five prima-facie absurdities a day now,
the kind where the desperate wholesale biters are more funny.
And telling.

My real concern is "Bush's plan to suspend elections and declare a
theocracy".

Nobody can do that properly with a Borg Implant on their backs,
it scrambles the Voice Of God signal.

It said ATTACH ON BACK, not ATTACK IRAQ!!!!!

Failure will mean NO Armageddon for our holy deliverence !

Don't you people finally finally see the diabolical mechanations of this
brainless chimp?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

ADV-NEWS, Create an e-annoyance, go to jail. When you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclo 15
OT: Flame Form--the easy way to flame 6
POLICE AFTER BLOGGER FOR PUBLISHING MOCKING CARTOONS 7
No Man's Sky - Next update 6
Powerful "Flame" cyber weapon found in Iran 5
OT: What replaces usenet? 26
Whoa!!!>>>Microsoft shutters Windows private folders 49
McAfee update exterminates Excel 0

Back
Top