Updating Linked Tables

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I have several Excel spreadsheets as linked tables in Access, and I can't
update the data in these tables. I don't have any relationships among the
tables, so I know it's not a problem with referential integrity. I recently
changed the paths to the tables using Linked Table Manager, and the problem
seems to have arisen after that, but none of the paths/directories are
protected, so I'm stumped.
 
Ken

AND YOU PUT UP WITH THIS SHIT?

why aren't you bitching about it to Microsoft?

WHY DO WE LET THEM DO THIS TO US?

I swear; the ISAM drivers to update excel spreadsheets were like
optional components in Visual Basic 6 installer i thought

-aaron
 
OK, Ken, thanks. I just read the article and I guess I must have installed
SP2 (probably automatic update). I guess I'm SOL, since the database has
several features which query the Linked spreadsheets so they could (used to)
be updated. I suppose I could try reinstalling Office 2002, sans Service Pak
2.
 
I'm using Office XP SP3 and can still update linked EXCEL files. Not sure
yet which update to Office XP turns this feature off, but I'm going to be
very wary of what I install for the time being....

--

Ken Snell
<MS ACCESS MVP>
 
wow.

does microsoft know about this?

i just am outraged that microsoft would let a bug like this out into
the wild.

i mean.. these people dont take this shit seriously.


-Aaron
 
legal issues?

how does a company with SEVENTY ****ING BILLION DOLLARs not have 500k
to pay off that guy?.

i mean; either he has a case or he doesn't

-aaron
 
Would someone be so kind as to explain why this was taken away?

All I see is "For legal reasons". What is the "Legal reason"?

Do we really think that someone told them to "REMOVE IT"? I don't think so.
I think it's a bunch of crap and just an excuse.

What the hell is MS doing or do they know what their doing?

IMHO
 
John said:
Would someone be so kind as to explain why this was taken away?

All I see is "For legal reasons". What is the "Legal reason"?

Do we really think that someone told them to "REMOVE IT"? I don't think so.
I think it's a bunch of crap and just an excuse.

What the hell is MS doing or do they know what their doing?

It appears to be the following.
Patent ruling costs Microsoft $8.9 million
http://news.com.com/Patent+ruling+costs+Microsoft+8.9+million/2100-1007_3-5735432.html

All the more reason to disallow software patents. They are getting
quite ridiculous.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
 
Tony Toews said:
It appears to be the following.
Patent ruling costs Microsoft $8.9 million
http://news.com.com/Patent+ruling+costs+Microsoft+8.9+million/2100-1007_3-5735432.html

All the more reason to disallow software patents. They are getting
quite ridiculous.

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm

Thanks, Tony...I love the quote from the article: "We do not believe
today's verdict will have any impact on our customers," said Microsoft
spokeswoman Stacy Drake. Anybody got a dish of crow I can send to Ms.
Drake??? sheesh.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top