a144mb said:
I'm building a clean install XP. What is the difference between
'unpartitioned' and 'partitioned' space?
When you buy a drive, it normally comes without any partitions on it--*all*
unpartitioned space. In order to use the drive, you have to "partition"
it--create one or more partitions, set up with a particular file system,
cluster size, etc.
Normally , this partitioning is done as part of the Windows XP installation,
and most people create only a single partition, using all of the available
space. Some people choose to have two or more partitions, but it's very rare
that anyone leaves any space unpartitioned, since space can't be used unless
it's in a partition.
I want to install XP onto
one of the two. What's the advantage or disadvantage of either one?
It's not a matter of advantages or disadvantages. There's no choice at all.
Unpartioned space is not usable. You can't install Windows on it or use it
for *anything* until you partition it.
I'm in a corporate environment. I'll be installing SP2 & Office2K3
SP2. Thanks for your responses.
You say "a clean install XP." Assuming that that means you are starting from
scratch and that there's nothing on the drive you want to keep, just boot
from the Windows XP CD (change the BIOS boot order if necessary to
accomplish this) and follow the prompts for a clean installation (delete the
existing partition by pressing "D" when prompted, then create a new one).
That procedure will partition and format the drive for you.
You can find detailed instructions here:
http://michaelstevenstech.com/cleanxpinstall.html
or here
http://windowsxp.mvps.org/XPClean.htm
or here
http://www.webtree.ca/windowsxp/clean_install.htm