S
Simon Tamman
I posted a while back in regards to an exception not being caught which was
seriously freaking me out.
I thought it was pretty common knowledge that:
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.UnhandledException+=new
UnhandledExceptionEventHandler(CurrentDomain_UnhandledException);
Should catch unhandled exceptions.
However, according to:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000201.html
(read the comments, particulary the one from the guy at the CLR team)
It doesn't (or at least, isn't supposed to).
The fact that it did in 1.0 and 1.1 was a bug and it never was supposed to.
Does this mean that there is no "catch all" ability in the .NET Framework?
seriously freaking me out.
I thought it was pretty common knowledge that:
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.UnhandledException+=new
UnhandledExceptionEventHandler(CurrentDomain_UnhandledException);
Should catch unhandled exceptions.
However, according to:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000201.html
(read the comments, particulary the one from the guy at the CLR team)
It doesn't (or at least, isn't supposed to).
The fact that it did in 1.0 and 1.1 was a bug and it never was supposed to.
Does this mean that there is no "catch all" ability in the .NET Framework?